CONTENTS 

INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................1


CHAPTER I -UFO Counterintelligence: 
Plugging Leaks in "Official" UFO History...................................17 
CHAPTER II - Disappearing Tesla: 
The Burial of Tesla and His discoveries......................................24 
Tesla's Extraction of Cosmic Energy.... ....................................... 31 
CHAPTER III - Concealed Energy: 
The Second Lie of Thermodynamics............................................38 
The Universe is Winding Down ...................................................42 
Advent of "SMS"..........................................................................48 
Isolated Systems and Irreversible Processes Forever?.. ....... ......50 
Disappearing Mass?....................................................................... 53 
Lyne's Hypothesis... ...................................................................... 58 
CHAPTER IV - Secret Science: 
Thought-Control on the Professional Level.................................64 
Epistemology ................................................................................ .64 
Thought-Control of Scientists and Professionals .........................70 
CHAPTER V - "Alien Visitors": 
Thought-Control on The Grass Roots Level......... ,.................... 76 
CHAPTER VI - The Roswell Hoax: 
A Truth Seeker Goes to Roswell..................................................91 
CHAPTER VII - Fuzzy UFOlogy: 
Keeping the Dupes Stupid ..........................................................107 
The CIA's Omnipresence in UFOlogy ...................................... 108 
My Mind and Thought-Control Ordeals...................................1ll 
The CIA's UFOlogy Double-Whammy..................................... 131 
Vascillating Vallee ..................................................................... 137 
Vallee and the Fraud Business...................................................142 
Vallee and the Secrecy Business...........,....................................146 
CHAPTER VIII - La Revolution Technologist: 
Turning Things Around 
Through Technology ................................................................. 155 
Bibliography............................................................................................165 
Index .......................................................................................................167 
Vita .........................................................................................................174 


INTRODUCTION 

This book continues where Occult Ether Physics leaves off, 
and explains how a scientific thought-control dictatorship has been 
created gradually, by combined coercive-monopolist interests, 
through a monolithic mass media, a compliant government, and 
armies of overt and covert government propagandists. These 
combined forces manufacture opinion and control most thought in 
our society, making it difficult for innovative individuals to express 
divergent scientific views without being virtually burned at the stake 
as "heretics" by quasi-religious scientific thought-control zombies, 
who have fallen victim to the pressure to believe the science that Big 
Brother wants them to. 

In Occult Ether Physics (1997, 1998), Space Aliens From the 
Pentagon (1993, 1996), and Pentagon Aliens (1999), I expounded 
on and documented the most important discovery in science, Nikola 
Tesla's electrodynamic space propulsion. Tesla and his work were 
literally buried by Relativism, especially after 1919. I also exposed 
some paradoxes of Relativism, and have apparently had a significant 
influence beyond the credit afforded me, both in the UFO and the 
free-energy fields (which are really the same fields). 

The motive for the Occult Science Dictatorship, which first 
began with the establishment of media-promoted Relativism, was 
to suppress, ridicule and conceal ether physics and free energy 
discoveries by the monopolist-owned media giants who obliterated 
Tesla's name, because he had made so many important free energy 
discoveries. They also purged the ether physics through which Tesla 
had realized his electrodynamic space propulsion method. This 
discovery threatened the "energy-heart" of perpetual security and 
control by the monopolies. Energy control was the cash cow that the 
monopolies relied on for continuity. He who threatened to sever the 
lines of energy dependency, threatened the flow of cash into the 
pockets of the monopolies, and had to be eliminated. 

The Dictatorship promotes a type of sophisticated pseudo- 
science in areas where its interests are threatened. This diverts the 

-1


inquisitive nature of those who believe the lies which suppress 
alternative science by declaring it "impossible" or "pseudo-science". 

With gasoline and fuel prices generally at an all-time high, and 
California in an artificially-created energy crunch, the oil giants 
proposed to drill in the pristine Alaskan National Wildlife Refuge. 
They actually had the gall to attempt to drill in the Yellowstone. 
Meanwhile, SUV owners are lucky if they get seven miles per gallon. 
The propaganda I heard on the news in July, 2001 was that it came 
up in Congress that SUVs "are only getting 24 miles per gallon", but 
"should be getting 27 miles per gallon", but "manufacturers had 
refused to allow it." What a laugh. I wonder how much the SUV 
manufacturers had to pay for that lie. 

I have in my files a list of over 200 patents for vapor 
carburetors, granted between the 1920s and 1940. Many of these 
carburetors were available to the public until 1940, from such 
manufacturers as the Holly Carburetor Company. These companies 
still have them in their files, and probably still possess prototypes 
and production models of them. So why don't they start 
manufacturing them again and sell them to us? 

The Pogue carburetor was tested in 1935. A V-8 Ford coupe, 
driven from Winnipeg, Manitoba to Vancouver, B.C. Canada, got 
130 miles per gallon. The government grabbed the carburetor and 
put it on the Sherman Tank, as WW II began. The tanks got 70 
miles per gallon. Rommel's Afrika Korps ran out of fuel. After the 
8th A.F. Ploesti (Romanian) oil refinery raid, the Germans resorted 
to American "acetylene chemistry" to produce gasoline from coal, 
but the Panzer Korps eventually ran out of fuel during the war. 
Hence, the Pogue carburetor became a "national security secret", 
denied to the public by extraordinary "national security" policies. 
The pattern of using the government's national security measures to 
unconstitutionally suppress the natural technological progress of our 
people has never been broken, at least not yet. 

In 2000 it was announced that three Japanese-made "gasoline- 
electric hybrid" cars would hit the open market in 2001 (they are on 
the road now). The oil companies made a pre-emptive strike, 

-2


fabricating an "energy crisis" in late 2000 to justify jacking up the 
price of international and domestic fuels. They also manipulated the 
markets and available energy resources to fabricate the "California 
energy crisis". This 'crisis' and the artificial increase in the price of 
Arab crude (the OPEC cartel was an invention of the international 
importers, not the Arabs, who only do what they are told), were 
used to excuse the sudden abandonment of the "conservation of our 
national resources"—a major issue back in 1973—incredibly, to 
support the continued suppression of domestic production in favor 
of importation of foreign crude, right in the middle of another 
(artificially-created) "fuel crisis"! 

Domestic oil production has been suppressed since WW II in 
favor of the large—mostly Rockefeller-owned—international oil 
importers from sources in South America, the Middle East, 
Indonesia, etc. The oil-importers were able to get our government 
to limit domestic U.S. oil production, so they could buy cheap 
foreign oil and sell petroleum products domestically at artificially 
high prices at the expense of independent domestic producers, who 
were restricted to limited production. In Texas, in the '60s, the 
"five-day allowable" meant that domestic independent producers 
could pump crude oil only five days per month. Meanwhile, the 
international oil importers—which also owned plenty of domestic 
mineral deposits—still had their foreign oil coming in every day of 
every month without restrictions, so only the public, domestic 
independents and oil workers were harmed by the illegal and 
unconstitutional denial of income. 

It is pertinent to note that, while we ordinary citizens are 
denied the fuel-saving carburetors, the oil companies ship their 
crude in giant, long, narrow tankers which exploit a highly efficient 
nautical principle, using ships with proportionally long hulls to move 
the crude from foreign locations to the coastal American refineries 
of the Rockefeller companies with the greatest efficiency. When it 
came to saving HIS money, John D. Rockefeller really didn't mess 
around, but he made certain that the U.S. government prohibited us 
from practicing the same kind of frugality. 

-3


In 1967, before the 1973 "fuel crisis", the government began 
to require special equipment on new automobiles for use in 
America. One of these devices was the catalytic converter. So what 
does a catalytic converter do? A catalytic converter contains 
"activated carbon"—impregnated with a catalyst, such as "platinum 
black" (platinum oxide) or "palladium black" (palladium 
oxide)—which converts hydro-carbon gases or liquids to carbon 
dioxide (CO2), on contact. Hydro-carbon gases and liquids are fuels, 
which can be used to run your engine. 

CO2 is a fire extinguisher, especially for hydrocarbon fuel fires. 
If you put the hydrocarbons in the vapor state, from your gas tank, 
into a carburetor vacuum intake, it will help to run your engine. If 
you put CO2 into your carburetor vacuum intake, it will partially 
"extinguish" the combustion in your engine, and rob you of gas 
mileage. So why does the U.S. government require auto 
manufacturers to install mandatory catalytic converters on your car, 
which convert usable, raw hydrocarbon vapor fuel from your gas 
tank, and CO (carbon monoxide) "blow-by" from your crankcase, 
into a "fire extinguisher", then put that fire extinguisher into your 
carburetor to interfere with the combustion in your engine, and rob 
you of gas mileage? And why did it require the manufacturers to do 
that in 1967? Because the oil companies wanted it to. 

This book is about how powerful economic interests, which 
also control the government, the mass media and academic 
institutions, have used scientific thought-control to suppress free- 
energy technology. The UFO is only the most glaring and 
remarkable example. If you are intelligent enough to realize that 
man-made UFOs exist, then you know that "free energy inventions 
work", because a UFO is a free energy invention. 

Because of the corrupt behavior of the mega-corporations, oil 
companies and our government, we must choose between them and 
the UFO and other free-energy technology, because they have left 
us no alternative, and because it is the rational and ethical thing to 
do. If there is "global warming", the chief culprits are the oil 
companies and our government. The ideas which I have advocated 

-4


for over 30 years will remove this corporate-created red herring 
when put into effect. 

Since it now appears that physics took a "wrong turn" after 
1900 and abandoned the path of ether physics, after it had already 
produced so many of the world's greatest discoveries—the electron, 
radio, electrodynamic space propulsion, free-energy generators, and 
the "nuts and bolts" of electrical science as we know it, etc.,—we 
must now go back and build a new physics on the foundation of an 
integrated view of reality which includes ether physics. 

We must rake government secrecy and misinformation aside, 
and take a closer look at the reality of that not-so-distant past of a 
century ago. The activity has already begun, and exciting times are 
ahead once more in the field of science. 

Through the use of creative intuition, logic and reason, a web 
of "credential-ism" is removed, to reveal a body of scientific 
orthodoxy, full of contradictions, misrepresentations, false logic, and 
mysticism. As these are cut away, a soft underbelly of pseudoscience, 
which has been masquerading as absolute, immutable truth 
for almost a century is exposed. We must replace this soft underbelly 
with "abs of steel". 

Speaking of the soft underbelly, contrary to what the public is 
led to believe, Relativism was invented not by Albert Einstein, but 
by a Croatian Jesuit Priest named R. G. Boscovich (1711-87), the 
first exponent of Newtonian ideas in Italy, who attempted to 
account for all physical effects in terms of action at a distance 
between point particles.1 

The concept of the luminiferous ether was soon abandoned, in 
spite of Huygens' development of a brilliant wave hypothesis. A 
"corpuscular" theory of light—based on Newton's earlier 

1Boscovich, Theoria Philosophiae Naturalis, Venice, 1763. 
2Traite de la lum., p. 17 

-5


hypothesis3—was adopted almost universally. So the ether theory 
had been abandoned before in this earlier mid- 18th century instance, 
in favor of a corpuscular theory of light. Ether theory was to be 
taken up again, then abandoned at the beginning of the 20th century, 
for the same reasons... Relativism and the corpuscular theory of 
light. 

Back in the 18th century, Boscovich and his assistant Michell 
had taught the doctrine of the mutual interpenetration of matter, i.e., 
that two substances may occupy the same space at the same time, 
without excluding each other.4 

In 1782, George Louis LeSage5 published a proposal to account 
for gravitation by means of the ether theory of Renee Descarte, that 
a cloud of excessively minute particles—"ultra-mundane corpuscles" 
as he called them—which resembled the neutrinos of modern atomic 
physics, filled all space. According to Le Sage, the ether moved with 
great speed in all directions. When two particles or bodies of 
ponderable matter were near each other, they would partly screen 
each other from bombardment by this ether, so that less 
bombardment on their screened sides increased the force on their 
unscreened sides, pushing them together, appearing to be an 
attractive force between them, which Le Sage identified as Newton's 
force of gravity. 

In 1889, Sir William Thomson6 made the assumption that 
material atoms move through space without displacing the ether, a 
concept which reflected the Boscovich theory. But by 1896/7, he had 
redacted this theory in embarrassment, when he realized how 

3Newton's Memoir, Phil. Trans, vii (1762); Royal Society, 9 Dec. 1676 (Birch iii p. 255) 

4Priestley's History, i p. 392 

5 Mem. de Berlin for 1782 (Berlin, 1784, p. 404) 

6 Baltimore Lectures, pp. 413-14, 463 and appendices A and E 

7 Letter, Fitzgerald to Heaviside, 8 June 1846 

-6


ridiculous it was. 

Albert Einstein's wife, a Croatian scientist, was probably 
responsible for introducing Einstein to the Relativism of Boscovich. 
This is probably the origin of rumors that Einstein had "stolen" the 
theory of Relativity from his wife. When Tesla was asked about 
Relativism, he disdainfully exclaimed, "I have already heard about 
this from Boscovich." Tesla's well-known objections to Relativism 
were probably formulated while Einstein was still a boy. 

Boscovich and Michell had arrived at their Relativist Theory 
by reflecting on Baxter's doctrine of "the immateriality of the soul", 
a religious doctrine appropriate to a church, but not really essential 
to a scientific laboratory. If the Jesuits had gained control of science 
more permanently, there would probably be prayer benches in 
physics labs today. They said 'an atom would have no definite size, 
but should be conceived as extending throughout all space'; and 'a 
molecule would consist not of atoms side by side', but of 'spheres of 
power mutually penetrated, and the centres even coinciding.'8 

In 1846, Michael Faraday9 appeared to briefly fall under the 
influence of Relativism, proposing to 'dismiss the aether', or to 
replace it by lines of force between centres', with 'the centres and 
lines of force together constituting the particles of material 
substance'. By 1851 however10, the spell was broken, when Faraday 
began the modern era of theory which Relativism opposes today. 
Faraday suggested that if the existence of a luminiferous aether were 
to be admitted, it might be the vehicle of magnetic force, adding, 'if 
there be an ether, it should have other uses than simply the 
conveyance of radiations'. This sentence is regarded as the origin of 
the electromagnetic theory of light. 

The religious nature of Relativism has changed very little since 
1763. In the meanwhile, ether theory has prevailed, been rejected 

8Cornu, Comptes Rendus xcii (1881), p. 1368 

 Faraday, Thoughts on Ray Vibrations, Phil. Mag. (3) xxviii (1846), p. 1045 

10 Cornu, Comptes Rendus, xcix (1884), p. 1045; Exp. Res., § 3075 

-7


twice, and is now in resurgence. Both the 1763 attack by Boscovich 
and the 1905 attack by Einstein resulted in the suppression of ether 
theory. The present religious dogmatism of Relativism has petrified 
the field of physics in universities and student laboratories, and has 
driven the more creative and innovative students away, causing a 
"brain drain", and attracting the least creative students.11 

The flaky concepts of 'time travel', 'mutual inter-penetration 
of matter', 'atoms extending to infinity', 'matter or time dilation or 
compression', and 'time dragging' or 'frame-dragging', have taken a 
toll on the minds of the world's students and scientists for long 
enough, so that the time is now ripe for a change. 

In Occult Ether Physics I asserted that a select few government 
and corporate scientists were privy to 'occult' scientific principles, 
based on ether physics, which Relativism is used to conceal. This is 
the "classified science" that the government conceals pursuant to 
the National Security Act. 

Since the advent of government-manipulated UFOlogy, 
generally recognized as getting seriously under way with the 1947 
Roswell Hoax, the theory of Relativity has been used more than 
anything else to scramble the brains of a clueless public, which has 
now been dumbed down by over 54 years of this theory, which has 
also been conspicuously used to conceal man-made UFOs with 
fabricated "parallel universes" (the Boscovich "mutual inter- 
penetration" theory), Einsteinian time-travel scenarios, "space-time 
warps", and all manner of contorted stories and fantasies related to 
Relativist theory, which have been manufactured by CIA 
committees of propagandists with Ph.D.s in Relativity theory. 

I have watched the growth of the many false theories derived 
from Relativity since 1946—even before Roswell—but have never 
been fooled by them. I was there when the people of Roswell and 
surrounding areas, where the government UFOs were so often 
observed after WWII, were gradually coerced and intimidated into 

11 William Cantrell, Commentary on Maxwell's Equations and Special Relativity Theory, Infinite 
Energy Magazine, Vol. 7, Issue 38, July/Aug. 2001 


shutting up about "secret German aircraft" being developed by our 
government at nearby bases, and finally accepting the government 
lies that UFOs are alien spacecraft. 

A believer in man-made UFOs, who doesn't happen to share 
a belief in space aliens as the responsible—or even the partially 
responsible—parties, is made to feel uncomfortable when among 
those of a UFOlogy gathering, sort of like an Atheist at a 
fundamentalist Christian revival meeting, or a microbiologist at a 
witch-doctor convention. 

The pressure to believe—in such things as alien visitations, 
bogus UFO technology, mental telepathy with aliens, remote 
viewing, the Relativist religion, the Big Bang, bogus conspiracies, 
time-travel, abductions by aliens, "other dimensions", "inter- 
dimensional travel", "secret alien rulers of earth", ghosts, etc.—is 
not the natural product of truly free or healthy minds. It is the 
product of controlled minds, whether by thought control—as in the 
case of government-controlled scientists, professionals, or the 
public—or by mind control—as in the case of victims of covert, 
abusive government mind-control programs, who have been chosen 
and subjected involuntarily as victims to such programs, because 
they are suggestible people, many of whom already had neurological 
disorders which rendered them vulnerable in the first place. 

As for "aliens", I am not saying that it is impossible for 
intelligent life to exist elsewhere in the universe. What I am saying 
is that there is no reliable evidence that such extraterrestrial beings 
have ever visited earth, even though there are many covert CIA 
programs, researchers, front-writers and speakers, who are paid to 
misinterpret, mal-interpret, or re-interpret vague, ambivalent, 
misunderstood, mysterious, or unexplained things in archaeology, 
ancient history and manuscripts, languages, cultures, art forms, 
mythology, religion or poetry; or in the 'exact' sciences, such as 
meteorology, physics, astronomy or paleontology... all to create false 
"documentation" for such theories. 

These scenarios twist ancient history and archaeology around 
to make it look like flying saucers/UFOs, seen by millions of rational 

-9


people, are the ships of space aliens, who have been "controlling 
humanity for thousands, even millions, of years", and even promote 
the lie that aliens have "seeded" human DNA with alien (or 
'reptilian-alien') DNA. 

The truth of the matter is, we don't know for certain that 
intelligent alien life forms exist elsewhere in the universe, having no 
direct knowledge to that effect, nor do we possess any object 
fabricated by an alien life form. While it may be probable that alien 
life exists elsewhere, we still do not know, and will probably never 
know for sure. Probability is not sufficient to base a reasonable belief 
that aliens are visiting and controlling earth, nor worth changing 
your life or opinions over. 

We know that organic life forms—the only kind we do know 
of—are what aliens would also have to be, in order to survive in 
earth's environment, even with special clothing. Aliens would also 
have to come from a similar environment to earth. The nearest 
"habitable" planets are so far away, that even if traveling at the 
speed of light, the trip would take too long, even millions of years in 
the case of some of the star systems suggested. This gulf can't be 
traversed by "time travel" or "wormhole" scenarios buttressed by 
contorted Relativist mathematical equations and "explanations". 

It has been estimated for example, that a ship traveling at only 
one-quarter the speed of light, which collided with a particle the size 
of a grain of sand, would be disintegrated. Extraterrestrials would 
have no compelling reason to come to earth, and if they had been 
coming here for years, they would have made their presence 
unmistakably known to us, but have not done so. Consequently, 
there is no reliable evidence or logic to back up such theories. 

There is plenty of evidence and logic to back up the fact that 
the government created these programs to induce incredible 
delusions as a means of confusing intelligent, inquisitive minds, to 
conceal the fantastic, yet exclusively man-made electrodynamic 
space propulsion technology of Nikola Tesla. And these programs 
don't stop at the TV set. They extend into schools, textbooks, 
literature, movies, religion, and anywhere else the spooks consider 

-10


fertile ground to plant the seeds of these lies. 

They have made extensive studies of human psychology, 
religion, mysticism, mythology, folk-tales, ethnology, and psychiatry, 
specifically to learn the best ways of making these lies palatable, and 
to know beforehand just what kinds of people will respond 
"positively" to these perverse and downright silly lies. 

There are many of these allegations, fantasies, and hoaxes, 
which can be traced directly or indirectly to government sources. 
The rest appear to be entrained and induced by the continuous 
government thought-control propaganda, always in such a way as to 
give the government "plausible deniability". 

Whether you are willing to admit it, we are living in a time in 
which scientific thought is being systematically controlled by a 
hidden dictatorship, brought about by thought-control over most 
people in society. This thought-control sometimes takes the form of 
reticence, rejection of rational explanations, or active promulgation 
by dupes. The existence of this dictatorship is not obvious to the 
naive and trusting masses, because it is covertly carried out and 
enforced through means unsuspected by them, to conceal certain 
("occult") scientific knowledge of UFOs and other free-energy 
technology, as well as to make them more pliable to the 
government's other Big Lies of a more political nature. 

The secret technologies acquired by the government and placed 
under secrecy orders—under threat of punishment by law of those 
within the government, even by death without trial, should they dare 
to reveal these scientific secrets—all belong to the American people, 
because they paid for them, or belong to the inventors, scientists, or 
other individuals from whom the government stole or confiscated 
them at the point of a gun. 

Most government secrecy is actually protectionism, for the 
benefit of private corporations, executed through abuse of the 
government's exclusive legal right to the use of force, to protect 
powerful, mega-corporate interests. The government cloaks these 
illegal actions beneath a veil of "national security", which gives the 
corporate protectionism a false aura of "the rule of law", patriotism, 

-11


and legal force and effect, which equates "corporate security 
interests" with "national security interests". 

Powerful economic interests are conservative in nature, in the 
sense that a large percent of corporate holdings are tied up in archaic 
fuels—like oil, natural gas and coal—in archaic technology-like 
cars, ships, planes and trains—and in other archaic and 
"conservative" resources. This conservatism "conserves" the 
resources of old, powerful families, old powerful corporations, old 
powerful financial institutions, old powerful political traditions, old 
powerful manufacturing interests, and old vested mineral interests, 
investments in "conventional" industry and technology, chemical 
cartels, and other things controlled by the few—threatened by new 
technology in the hands of the many—particularly that involving 
energy and transportation. 

These conservative interests—usually portrayed as "liberals" 
—have resisted and fought tooth and nail to prevent free energy 
technology from taking hold for over a hundred years. 

Of all the secrets being protected by the government on behalf 
of the coercive-monopolists who control it, none is more important 
that the flying saucer electrodynamic propulsion technology of 
Nikola Tesla, which is why there is still such a big hullabaloo over 
it, over 56 years after the U.S. government acquired it from Nazi 
Germany. This book explains the workings of this dictatorship, and 
points out why and how we should end it. 

I heard one of the people who conspicuously spreads the alien 
line say, "I have no agenda". Anyone who says they have no agenda 
is a liar, because everyone has an agenda, unless they are 
unconscious, and he wasn't unconscious when he said it. So why did 
he lie? To make his "alien lies" more believable? The big question 
is, who has an "undisclosed" agenda? 

My agenda is out in the open: To encourage people to realize 
that UFO technology exists; that it is free-energy technology; that 
it is exclusively man-made technology (not of alien origin), which 
humans were capable of constructing with existing technology at 
least ninety years ago; that it is ours because we paid for it; that we 

-12


can build our own ships, using relatively simple technology; that 
there are many other free-energy technologies; that we can stick 
together and demand the right to use this technology, since the 
government has no legitimate right to conceal it, or to withhold it 
from us, or to prevent us from using it; and that the U.S. 
constitution required them to disclose the technology to us long ago. 

Independent American owners of domestic untapped or over- 
regulated mineral interests have already been the victims of the 
mega-corporations, and it is probably too late for them to recoup 
their losses, which may be permanent. These losses have been 
effected through government limitation of domestic mineral 
production, ostensibly under conservation measures, under the false 
premise that there is a relative scarcity of such minerals, and that 
humans will continue to use these same minerals until they are "all 
gone", and that that time would come in "only a few years". 

But the "conservation" of oil and gas has had an ulterior 
purpose, unrelated to the "national security interests." Through this 
knowingly ridiculous scenario, the international mineral 
corporations have concealed what they have known for many years: 
That technologies already exist to make their mineral investments 
virtually worthless, and that it is only a matter of time until 
intelligent individuals re-discover these secrets, and carry them forth 
to the public, despite the most fervid and vicious resistance. 

Seeing the future inevitabilities, the coercive monopolists used 
regulations and policies to make certain that they would sell their 
holdings at a hefty profit before the bottom dropped out, thus 
leaving independent domestic mineral owners holding the bag, with 
their minerals mostly still in the ground, in the currently lucrative 
market. Their complacency as to their rightful share of profits from 
their minerals was purchased with false assurances that they would 
realize them in the future, and should have realized that they were 
being hornswoggled. 

It is probably too late for them to sell their minerals at the 
artificially elevated prices of today, or even at a decent price. The 
reason for the sudden re cent change to "domestic production" (note 

-13


I didn't say "independent" domestic production) is because the 
internationals are rushing to unload their untapped domestic 
minerals before the other foot drops, and free-energy technology 
lowers the prices and value of their "archaic mineral resources". 

Notice that the "first" places that the "new" president, George 
II and gang have begun to increase "domestic" petroleum 
production are areas like the North Slope of Alaska—the minerals 
of which are owned by "Republican" Robert O. Anderson of 
Roswell, former president of the Bilderberg Group, creator of 
ARCO and of the Diamond A Cattle Company, the largest land 
holding company in North America. To protect regular oil 
production from oil-shale production, Anderson purchased the 
rights to every known oil-shale deposit in North America. And, 
production is now increasing for "offshore" minerals which George 
Ist's company, Tidewater Oil Company of Houston, owns or 
specializes in producing. The production "incentives" for this were 
the artificially-created increase in the price of Arab crude, and the 
artificially-created California energy crunch. To show how certain 
the conspirators were that the election was in the bag, these 
"incentives" were begun even before the election of Nov. 6, 2000. 

I believe that the proximate cause of the Sept. 11, 2001 
terrorist attack on America was the sudden "switch" to domestic 
production of petroleum, and that it was ordered by Saudi oligarchs 
and Middle Eastern oil producers, who will lose untold billions due 
to the switch. The assault was intended to drive the American 
economy backward, to prevent the switch. 

Soon, free-energy and alternate energy will lower the price and 
demand for petroleum. The internationals hope to sell as much as 
they can, then get out of the business—maybe even sucker the 
independents into buying their interests—while smaller independent 
domestic mineral owners will be a "day late and a dollar short". 
Waiting for years, expecting their "boat to come in", it will be 
disappointing when it turns out to be a fly-infested banana boat, 
with rotten fruit on board, because it arrived "too late." They will 
only have themselves, the mega-corporations, and the corrupt 

-14


government to blame for this tragic eventuality. 

When the automobile came into its own, the same thing 
probably happened to horse-breeders and wagon-makers, except they 
weren't international, coercive-monopolists who could control the 
government and educational institutions to prevent automobile 
technology from being known, understood, developed and used by 
the public, like UFO technology has been. 

The independent mineral owners don't see the hand writing on 
the wall, because they are blinded by the Relativist baloney about 
"shrinking energy resources", a sham which suppresses their 
prosperity in the "national security interest", so the mega-corporate 
oil importers can take all the gravy, and consumers pay through the 
nose. 

What a bunch of suckers. Domestic independent oil producers 
defrauded by international oil companies. They have quietly rejoiced 
in the high fuel prices in gleeful delusion, in anticipation of being 
the eventual beneficiaries of continually-rising prices. But this 
"deferred gratification" is without guarantees that they will ever be 
compensated for their losses. 

The "hard sell" on conservation should have sent up a warning 
flag as to the fraud. After all, did they really think the consumers 
give a damn about conservation, at the cost of exorbitant prices? 

I am not bringing this up to try to recruit the independent 
domestic producers into the free-energy revolution, although they 
certainly are welcome. I just want to explain how the Occult 
Thought-Control Dictatorship operates. It won't do the 
independents any good to fight us. We aren't to blame, though they 
would be better off supporting the revolution, which could usher 
them into a technical arena which might familiarize them with 
rational alternatives for developing their mineral interests in a 
profitable way in the future. There are always plastics, lubricants, 
hydrogen conversion, petrochemicals, and other technologies. 

The people who peddled the wisdom of "conserving our 
domestic minerals" in the "national security interest" back in 1973, 
are the very same people who have sold us on drilling in the pristine 

-15


National Alaskan Wildlife Preserve. This should tell the idiots out 
there that groups like the "Trust For Public Lands" are temporary, 
tax-free land holding operations of these same people. Louder! I 
can't hear you! Does anyone hear them screaming about the 
Alaskan drilling? With all their money and influence, if they did 
scream, it wasn't loud enough for me to hear them, and I've been 
reading the papers almost every day. 

The problem with holding large tracts of land—something 
apparently learned by the Diamond A Cattle Company—is the 
requirement for private owners to pay taxes on that land. 

Enter the "public trust" huxters: A way to sucker the public, 
by bribing "lawmakers" to pass some "private conservation" 
laws—so that large, private land holders can enjoy their land tax-
free, unlike the ordinary poor slob American—and even fool the 
dupes who work for them into thinking they are do-gooders, when 
in reality, they are duping useful idiots into helping them pull off 
another publically-subsidized fraud. Whenever it becomes expedient 
for them to cash in on their massive land holdings, they will 
suddenly take off their "sheep's clothing", and show themselves to 
be "wolves" (no insult to the wolves intended). 

Anyone who says free-energy inventions will not work is either 
ignorant, a victim of government thought-control, or a liar with a 
vested interest to protect. Flying saucers/UFOs—seen by millions 
of people since the '30s—are graphic proof that they are wrong, and 
proof that some free-energy inventions work, and have been 
suppressed for over a century, as my research shows. 

I predict that those who have held onto the Relativist Theory 
for so long will be sorely disappointed in the near future by the 
triumph of free-energy solutions, which will discredit the theory 
along with the associated Second Law of Thermodynamics and 
entropy theory. 

These triumphs will be accompanied by the re-discovery or 
liberation of free-energy secrets which have been concealed by the 
corporate-monopolist state for at least sixty years. We must not let 
the terrorist assault of 2001 halt our revolution! 

-16


CHAPTER I -UFO COUNTERINTELLIGENCE: 
Plugging Leaks in "Official" UFO History 

The public's eventual apprehension of UFO electrodynamic 
technology and other free-energy discoveries—whenever these occur 
—will bring about a political, social and economic revolution in 
favor of greater individual sovereignty, freedom, and creativity. The 
electrodynamic technology (not to be confused with something 
shown in traditional science texts under "electrodynamics") has the 
potential to reduce environmental problems to a minimum, if not to 
eliminate them entirely. 

Those seeking to create a one-world fascist globalism for almost 
a century, fearing the technology will destroy their sick dream, 
"nipped this energy revolution in the bud", as soon as its potential 
became apparent at the beginning of the 20th century. 

In retrospect, it is an odd circumstance: "Advanced" 
electrodynamic technology was actually discovered before "archaic" 
aerodynamic technology was. 

Since I am a "senior citizen", one would expect me to be 
engrossed in the archaic concepts of jet-powered UFOs 
("aerodynes") or jet aircraft, while younger men pushed the 
envelope, spreading the "advanced" ideas of electrodynamic 
technology, which has always been the means of propulsion of true 
UFOs. Instead, that burden has fallen on me, while mostly younger 
gullible dupes gleefully blabber the CIA's misinformation for them. 
For example, in 1999 I learned that a younger English writer 
seemed to be saying the same things I do, until I looked beyond his 
claims. He copied my ad campaign and claims, but what followed 
was an account of archaic, aerodynamic German technology as a 
lame explanation for electrodynamic UFO technology. Up to his 
claims, he was a "mini-me"...exactly l/8th my size, ethically, 
metaphysically, and creatively, and there the scaled-down similarities 
ceased, for he delivers nothing except misinformation. I have 
generated an anachronism: a pseudo-conservative British "young 
fogey". 

-17


While one would expect a younger man to be digging deeper, 
researching Tesla's "truly advanced" technology of 1894, he was 
extolling the virtues of more archaic WW II German "aerodyne" 
technology of the 1940s, which is limited to jet-powered aircraft. 
Whether he was actually employed by the spooks, or was unaware of 
their involvement, is immaterial to the fact that the publisher's 
interest in his redundant book was supported by the establishment. 
He calls his book "UFO Disclosures" (not the real title), an 
oxymoronic title, since all the "FOs" ("flying objects") he refers to 
ceased to be "Ued" (unidentified) after they were declassified and 
published in Janes' Fighting Aircraft of World War Two, in the postwarl940s. 
So where's the "UFOs" or the "Disclosures"? A little late, 
wouldn't you say? 

Just as jet power is sometimes used today to conceal U.S. 
government UFOs, the jet and rocket-propelled aerodynes of the 
Third Reich were used to conceal Tesla-conceived Nazi electrodynes, 
in a cycle of anachronistic dualism—archaic, jet-propelled, 
aerodynamic technology, used to conceal older, more advanced 
electrodynamic technology. None of the aerodynamic technology has 
any relevance to true UFOs and represents an attempt to connect the 
remarkable performance of electrodynamic German UFOs to the 
"conventional, aerodynamic, German jet-propulsion" of 1945. 

So, instead of calling his book "UFO Disclosures", I have 
renamed it "UFO Counter-Revolution", because it is counter-
revolutionary propaganda designed to thwart the natural revolution 
which should result as the world realizes the concealed truth. 

The book is an example of propaganda created by American 
and British intelligence agencies to stem the tide of truth presently 
flooding into the public's awareness, as I attempt to "de-program" the 
public's thought-control codes. 

As an older revolutionary, I see the Brit as a "young fogey", 
counter-revolutionary type that the spook agencies were bound to 
manufacture as a "last ditch" defense against my expose of illicit 
British-American UFO secrecy and fraud. Their likely opinion, on 
seeing my book in Britain on a limited scale, was that "Those 

-18


American intelligence agencies aren't doing their job, so we'll have 
to do it for them." The British distribution of my books stopped, and 
the distributor was the least likely you would expect to fold under 
government pressure. 

The Brit's job was to debunk all but the aerodyne technology of 
the Third Reich (none of which was ever used), as a "last-ditch" 
defense which I predicted in my 1996 second edition of Space Aliens 
From the Pentagon. This approach sought to peddle the myth that all 
man-made UFOs are aerodynamic advancements based on Nazi jet 
designs. This admits the existence of UFOs, but says they are all 
aerodynes. Either the Brit never saw a UFO or he was lying, because 
once you've seen one perform, you'll never confuse it with a jet- 
powered craft. If he were that stupid, he wouldn't have been able to 
write a book. 

Most UFOlogists appear nuts by proposing outlandish "alien 
technology", while the Brit appears nuts by peddling archaic 
technology unrelated to UFOs. Instead of promoting the "alien" party 
line, he imitates my ads, but supports the conservative party line of 
conventional German aerodynamic jet technology that the oil 
companies love. If those experimental aerodynamic saucers actually 
worked, they would get much fewer miles per gallon than 
conventional jet aircraft, since they can't glide, and would also create 
more drag and friction at supersonic speeds due to increased surface 
area. This is a problem that electrodynamic UFOs don't have, since 
the increased surface area helps the electrodynamics work better. 

The Brit poses as avant garde, propagating conservative, old 
ideas. Instead of studying electrodynamic technology, which allows 
a craft to dart and zip quicker than a hummingbird, and exceed the 
equivalent of Mach 30 ("equivalent" because they are "inertia-free"), 
he extols huffing and blowing by jet engines, blasting the ships 
around like tired old buzzards with ragged wings. The Canadian 
"AVRO" aerodyne project served the same misinformational 
purposes in the '50s and '60s and was run by ex-Nazis, continuing 
the Third Reich's misinformational program for the Canadian and 
American governments. The disfunctional aerodynes were 

-19


declassified after the war, and the AVRO program succeeded in 
finally DIS-proving the several inadequate aerodyne saucer concepts. 

The British don't seem to understand our radical. American 
ways, which tend to make their "spookery" comparatively fuddyduddy. 
Nonetheless, I overestimated the public's capacity to see 
through corny lies in the past, and shouldn't be surprised if many are 
duped by them in the future. P.T. Barnum really knew his people. 

The electrodyne technology was concealed by aerodyne 
technology, by the spooks, since they didn't want anyone tracing it to 
the discoveries of Nikola Tesla, whom they thought they had 
successfully buried forever, until I resurrected him. This suggests that 
those who obliterated Tesla's name and discoveries from the public 
consciousness in 1943 included the agents of Nazi Germany. I 
documented Tesla's unwitting connection to the Nazis in Pentagon 
Aliens, 

I was fraudulently induced to include some misinformation in 
my 1993 first edition of Space Aliens From the Pentagon, My 1996 
second edition redacted it. The alleged "ships"—actually non-flying 
models of Felix Schauberger—were said to be electrodynamic, when 
in fact they were designed to use aerodynamic principles, but never 
flew to my knowledge, and probably wouldn't have been able to get 
off the ground. 

After discovering that the photos of the alleged "ships" actually 
depicted copper models of two of Schauberger's prospective designs, 
claimed to fly by means of internal fans intended to suck air in the 
top and to blow it out the bottom, allegedly powered by a 
Schauberger "water vortex" turbine, I felt the jackass ears growing on 
my head. Since the models resembled air conditioner vents, I dubbed 
them "flying air conditioner vents". 

I was enraged after being burned by this misinformation, but 
blamed myself for not exploring the allegations and documentation 
more carefully. The person responsible for it has admitted to me that 
he created these impressions to sell books, without really 
understanding the technology. His books were based partially on the 
"declassified" false aerodyne technology released in Germany by the 

-20


CIA for obvious reasons. I give him due credit for his honesty. He 
said he made plenty of money from those books, so much that he 
doesn't care to sell any more. I vowed never to be duped like that 
again. 

There are basically three groups who propagate the alleged 
German aerodyne stories: (1) The Naziphiles, motivated by a desire 
to establish that the technology was a German "Aryan" discovery 
(but these Bubbas apparently have never seen a UFO in action, and 
are too "untechnical" to realize that electrodynamics is involved); (2) 
the CIA misinformationists, who use the inept declassified aerodyne 
technology the same way the Nazi elite did, to conceal the real, 
electrodynamic Tesla technology; and (3) the dupes who believe that 
flying saucer technology in fact had an exclusively German origin, 
unaware that "real" UFOs use exclusively electrodynes invented by 
Tesla. (There are some who actually believe that the Schauberger 
"flying air conditioner vent" was a "gift" to the Nazis from "aliens", 
tantamount to saying that the flush toilet is a "gift of the gods.") 

A fourth group, which studies WW II-era Nazi UFO technology 
and secret weapons of the Third Reich, had realized that the 
aerodyne stuff was not the correct story. This group went wherever 
the evidence led it, bringing them to my work. I had firm 
documentation of things they had never heard of. The group had all 
the best research available from "conventional" sources, and some 
from extraordinary sources, yet could not explain the electrodynes 
mentioned in reliable reports which originated in wartime Germany. 

After the war, the CIA controlled all information available from 
"conventional" sources, leaked out declassified aerodyne technology 
for misinformational purposes, and successfully prevented the 
leakage of classified electrodynamic technology. The information 
from unusual (non-CIA) sources—mostly ex-Nazi Germans in South 
America—was misunderstood by them. 

My evidence on the electrodynes showed they were older than 
the aerodynes, while existence of the electrodynes isn't even admitted 
in conventional research. The German research group meanwhile 
unearthed documentation which corroborated some of my unusual 

-21


information, and published it in their papers. The symbiosis between 
this group and me soon attracted the attention of the spooks. 

My first edition of Space Aliens From the Pentagon was literally 
hacked out of raw paper and inked by me, myself and I, as a 
"samisdat", while I was still in the horrible throes of judicial abuse, 
engineered by CIA mind-control rats. My nervous system was still in 
upheaval, with my sweat and blood splattered all over those books, 
with my anger boiling over onto the pages. 

I'm not impressed by another redundant blow-by-blow account 
of the WW II aerodynamic developments of the Third Reich, 
including jet-propulsion technology, used now as disinformation. It 
has no relevance except as misinformation. Does anyone seriously 
believe that the REAL electrodynamic German flying disc technology 
would be published in Janes', at a time when they wouldn't even 
publish the statistics of many propeller-driven planes? 

I lost interest in the aerodyne stuff in 1953 after witnessing the 
performance of a real, electrodynamic UFO, and realizing that the 
aerodyne technology was irrelevant and obsolete even before it was 
invented and developed. 

The Nazi aerodyne projects were mostly smoke and mirrors, 
created as counterintelligence buffers to conceal the electrodyne 
technology. The CIA picked up where the Gestapo left off. Because 
of the inadequate explanations, Henry Stevens, of the German 
Research Project, Gorman, California, had begun to "look around 
the edges" of those buffers, and found me. That opened up a whole 
new set of possibilities which were supposed to remain hidden. 

In 1999 the Brit launched an Internet attack on Stevens, with 
an oblique attack on me, intended to break the linkage between 
Stevens and me. Steven lives in an isolated location, with no way of 
knowing of, or having an opportunity to respond to, the Brit's viper-
tongued attack, since he was unconnected to the Internet. He was 
considered an easy target in the cowardly attack by the Brit. 

The Brit's attack was intended to drive a wedge between my 
small contingent and Stevens' potential supporting group, a point of 
weakness in the linkage. Stevens responsibly attempts to research and 

-22


terret out the German UFO history, while my faithful readers and I 
believe in a purely Tesla electrodynamic technology, which fell into 
German hands in the 1930s. 

I learned about the Brit's attack when my name came up, only 
because I was E-mailed by researcher and writer Remy Chevalier, 
with whom I had communicated on occasion. The Brit's attack on 
Stevens was a "divide-and-conquer" strategy, designed to take pot- 
shots at me behind my back and split Stevens off, since he had cited 
my work in his, and had even unearthed some material corroborating 
my work. Since I had not cited Steven's work until 1996, I knew the 
Brit had my second edition, but the Brit lied to conceal that. 

Once I was brought into the discussion by Chevalier, I acted as 
an intermediary between Stevens and the Internet discussion group, 
and successfully exposed the Brit's undisclosed agenda, supported by 
Stevens' responses that he faxed to me. 

The attack walked on thin ice, since it risked giving us greater 
exposure. Neither Stevens nor I were expected to respond or to know 
of the attack. The Brit focused on the error I had redacted four years 
earlier, in correspondence and radio interviews, and three years 
earlier in my 1996 second edition, which the Brit possessed. I have 
found such dishonesty to be typical of misinformationists. 

I have been pulled into Internet donnybrooks on several 
occasions, the usual tenor of the attacks being personally directed at 
me, rather than at my work. These discussions occur daily on the 
Internet without my knowledge, but this was one I knew about only 
because I was notified by someone who knew of me. 

Nikola Tesla got lift-off even before the Wright Brothers' first 
flight at Kitty Hawk, North Carolina, and had difficulty in 
maintaining his silence following the Wright Brothers' success. 

It took terrible discipline for Tesla to hold his tongue under 
such circumstances. Truth is stranger than fiction, and that truth is 
among the strangest I know of. Under the circumstances, it can be 
explained and documented, including Tesla's motivations and 
political opinions at the time. His silence becomes clear and logical 
if you think about it. 

-23


CHAPTER II -DISAPPEARING TESLA: 


The Burial of Tesla and Rebirth of His Discoveries 

Nikola Tesla was buried, both literally and intellectually, in 
January, 1943. In 1993, I disinterred his most important work, the 
discovery of electrodynamic space propulsion, which he discovered 
in the 19th century, and documented it more fully in 1998. 

Does the name Nikola Tesla even ring a bell with you? If not, 
let me first say that Tesla was a pioneering inventor and 
technological philosopher whose science and ideas we use today 
more than ever before, yet only recently has his name resurfaced in 
alternative literature. His name was once a household word, sixty or 
seventy years ago. Thirty years ago, only a tiny few faithful and 
persistent admirers and experimenters knew of Tesla's work, yet 
there are those within the inner sanctums of the 'national insecurity' 
establishment who have never forgotten it. You've most likely heard 
the name being used in current alternative literature by the many 
johnny-come-latelys who have recently jumped on the bandwagon 
of nouveau "Tesla experts". That's O.K., but what took them so 
long? You can't really blame them for being so suddenly astounded, 
considering the long and thorough eradication of Tesla's name from 
encyclopedias and books on science, invention and technology, 
becoming the "invisible man" of science history. 

The conspicuous vacuum created where the mention of Tesla 
should have been, as one who made such important contributions 
to science, technology, and the quality of our lives, raises ominous 
questions as to why his memory became virtually stricken from 
history almost the day after his death. What did Tesla discover 
which threatened the powers that be? Since we already know about 
the many patented inventions, my assumption has always been that 
the unknown, still classified works were far in advance of the 
published ones, and were in realization of projects which Tesla had 
previously announced or had already tested and developed, but had 
not yet "...given to the world". 


The discoveries in question—the very existence of which is 
categorically denied by establishment and corporate scientists—were 
such things as........ 

-electrodynamic flying saucers 

- "free" or "environmental" energy discoveries 
-transmutation of elements 
-alternative "ether" physics and science 

- Tesla's Dynamic Theory of Gravity 
We know from available documentation and reliable sources 
that these discoveries and developments were actualized by Tesla 
before his death, yet are still classified. Within his many patented 
inventions, numerous startling discoveries and surprises have been 
recently found by careful researchers and experimenters, which 
show in retrospect that his claims were modest. 
Tesla was born in Smiljan, Lika, Austro-Hungary (now Serbia), 
in 1856, and died Jan. 3, 1943 in New York City, An early 
biography, Prodigal Genius, the Life of Nikola Tesla, by John J. 
O'Neill, was initially published three times in November, 1944. In 
case you are wondering, the three publishings in the same month 
were not due to landslide sales at the bookstores, but rather to 
O'Neill's having been threatened and censored by the FBI, and 
forced to republish several times because of their deletion and 
censoring of material which to this day is still classified. It was odd, 
given Tesla's repeatedly unsuccessful efforts to get the attention of 
the War Department, met with ignorance and shoddy treatment. It 
was not until after it came to their attention in 1942, that the Nazis 
were building flying saucers and other 'fantasy' weapons based on 
Tesla's inventions, that the U. S. Government became so concerned. 
So why hide something from the American public today which 
the Nazis stole before 1934? In the case of (flying saucer) electro- 
propulsion, this invention is not only classified, but the very 


existence of it is categorically denied by the government, while its 
covert agents in the UFOlogy. community attribute it to 
extraterrestrial, "alien" origins. What better way to deter civilian 
scientific investigation into the obvious? 

I first heard of Tesla in 1943, as a child of four, when his death 
was lamented by Elmer Schlosser, a neighborhood adult friend who 
first told me about him. I also once had in my collection of old 
books a well-preserved, beautiful old commemorative volume issued 
by the 1893 Chicago World's Fair---the Colutnbian Exposition— 
which featured Tesla as its honored guest. There were numerous 
photos of Tesla's inventions and some articles. Today, over 54 years 
after Tesla's death, experimenters are still conducting exciting and 
trail-blazing experiments with Tesla's discoveries of over 100 years 
ago, and continuing to find 'hidden' meanings in some of his early 
writings and patents. 

There have been countless speculations as to what Tesla's most 
secret discoveries were. At the time of his death, there was the 
approximate equivalent of a railroad boxcar load of Tesla materials 
confiscated by the FBI, from around four different storage locations 
and Tesla's hotel storage and hotel room and safe. Of this, a total of 
only about 150,000 documents were released to Tesla's Yugoslavian 
relatives, now held by the Tesla Institute in Belgrade. These 
documents and old models, primarily of a historical nature and 
already in the public domain, comprise most of the published Tesla 
materials of the institute, and of the world. 

The rest of the huge volume of Tesla documents and models 
was retained from early 1943 to late 1945 by the Custodian of Alien 
Properties, unclassified, in a warehouse in New York City, because 
the government's "experts" had declared in 1943 that none of it was 
worth classifying. The government "expert"—the equivalent of 
today's director of the CIA's Office of Scientific Intelligence—was 
a professor at M.I.T. In 1938, Tesla had written a critique of the 
huge Van de Graaff generator, and pointed out that one of his small 
Tesla coils would outperform the huge Van de Graaff, which was so 
large that it was housed in an aircraft hanger. That critique and 


Tesla's opposition to Relativism provoked the ire of the M.I.T. 
professor, a proponent of the "new" Relativism. For that infraction 
of the "rules", Tesla's lifelong work was treated to the posthumous 
revenge of the MIT Relativist professor, by having his work stored 
in a dark warehouse until the end of WW II. 
Following the arrival in America of the scientists and the secret war 
files of Nazi Germany, acquired in 1945 under Operation Paperclip, 
the spooks from Wright-Patterson Air Force Base hurried up to the 
warehouses of the Custodian of Alien Properties, and took 
possession of all the Tesla materials. They removed them to Wright-
Patterson, and every bit of them have been classified at the highest 
level ever since; the government having since declassified NONE of 
them. Thus, the Tesla materials, which the government's Relativist 
"science expert" had declared in 1943 contained "nothing worth 
classifying", is still classified today, 58 years later. 

The government distributed false rumors that "Tesla never kept 
notes", which was known to be a blatant lie, since the government 
had the tons of notes, papers, models and related things, and knew 
Tesla "kept massive notes". The notes on his Colorado Springs 
experiments alone (1899-1900) were enough for a large-format 
book of 433 pages. 
Considering the fact that Tesla continued to do research at his 
Colorado Springs laboratory for at least six more years—for which 
we have no notes—there is ample cause for believing that those 
subsequent experiments involved discoveries that are even more 
astounding than any nuclear weapons research. It is known from 
Tesla's own words that these additional experiments at Colorado 
Springs were 'much more far-reaching' than his disclosed 
experiments. 

The remainder of Tesla's papers and possessions which were 
still classified—literally tons of notes, documents, drawings, models, 
and plans—have been the subject of a lot of speculation. In 1979, 
when I requested access to Tesla papers held at the J. Robert 
Oppenheimer Study Center, at LANL ("Los Alamos National 
Laboratory"), the government admitted possession, but denied 


access for lack of the appropriate "badge" (security clearance). So 
I know that Tesla's papers are now held at least in part, in Los 
Alamos, New Mexico. On that same day, I found the hydrogen 
bomb plans on the public access shelves, yet was denied access to 
Tesla's papers. What could be more sensitive than the hydrogen 
bomb, which was invented by Tesla prior to 1943? 

After the war, in 1946, at age 8, when our family returned to 
the little west Texas town of Kermit, I visited the radio shop of my 
old friend, Elmer Schlosser, and lugged home a pile of salvaged 
electronic components that he gave me, after a savvy little Tesla 
talk. That was the same year that I began to research the German 
flying discs seen over the region. Elmer, who had grown up in the 
Cimarron Territory, near Tesla's Colorado Springs laboratory, 
during the time that Tesla was experimenting there, said the discs 
were "Tesla discoveries". 

I assembled the components that Elmer gave me, ran a 
ground line up a tree, placed my newly assembled device in my tree 
house, erected an antenna constructed of screen wire, and attempted 
to 'radio in' some power. Unsuccessful, I nonetheless continued my 
experiments with electromagnetism for eight more years, until I set 
them aside for twenty years. In 1975 I resumed my "Tesla project", 
eventually built a number of Tesla coils, and even began giving some 
lectures and demonstrations in the Santa Fe area to small gatherings. 
In late 1974, the CIA had commenced a pattern of harassment 
originally intended to "motivate" me to accept an executive position 
later offered to me by George Bush in early 1975. I rejected the offer 
and immersed myself deeply in intense research, and the harassment 
continued and intensified so much that it finally brought my 
research to a temporary standstill between 1986 and 1992. As soon 
as I had time to catch my breath, this provoked the first publication 
of my book, Space Aliens From the Pentagon, in 1993, Occult Ether 
Physics: Tesla's Hidden Space Propulsion System and the Conspiracy 
to Conceal It (revised second edition, 1998), concentrated on the 
19th century "aether" science leading up to Tesla's discovery of 
electrodynamic space propulsion, and I also included a couple of 


astounding, Relativity-destroying "free-energy" discoveries or re- 
discoveries. 
Tesla's holy grail was to build his "electric flying machine", and to 
draw some of the "environmental energy" out of the cosmos- This 
plan involved a theory of radioactivity under development by Tesla 
in the 1890s, which entirely presaged and conflicted with currently 
accepted Relativism, quantum mechanics, and nuclear energy 
theories. 

To Tesla, so-called "atomic energy" was in fact the result of 
"environmental energy" emanating from the cosmos, and made 
known to us via "radioactive" matter, which he said had the peculiar 
property of resonating and reacting with ubiquitous "cosmic 
radiation"—a term used by Tesla before 1900—which he called 
"Primary Solar Rays." 

The "cosmic radiation" of which Tesla spoke was of much 
higher frequency than what we call "radioactive emanations", which 
to Tesla were the result of a 'step-down' process, in which certain 
peculiar matter reacts to and converts the ubiquitous, 
omnidirectional cosmic radiation—which today we call "zero point 
radiation" ("ZPR") —from higher frequencies, to lower, more useful 
and appropriate frequencies, such as gamma, x-ray, ultraviolet, 
visible, infrared radiation, as well as magnetism and even electrical 
current. These step-down frequencies are much easier to detect and 
measure than the ZPR. Relativists deny the Primary Solar Rays 
exist. 

The existence of the ZPR was well known to Tesla in the 
1890s, but it was not until recently that it became scientifically 
permissible to even suggest a wave theory, since Relativists cling to 
their corpuscular theory. This radiation is of such high frequency 
that it normally passes through space, the earth, and our bodies 
without harm or incident, in constant equilibrium, because its short 
wavelengths do not normally react or resonate with the atoms of 
most matter. It is so-called "radioactive matter"—according to 
Tesla—-which has a peculiar atomic structure which reacts with this 
radiation to produce radioactivity. Atomic energy, to Tesla, comes 


from the ZPR, not atoms. If a lump of radium, for example, could be 
shielded from the effects of the ZPR, said Tesla, it would no longer 
show radioactivity. 

Most naturally radioactive elements are dense and 
"unstable"—that is, they are said by the Relativists to "decay" as 
radiation is emitted, to elements of lower atomic numbers. The 
Relativists—with whom Tesla vehemently disagreed—believe that 
naturally radioactive elements spontaneously lose mass in the 
process of such "decay", so that the energy released as radioactivity 
is equivalent to the lost mass according to Einstein's equation, E = 
MC2. 

This always seemed untenable to me, since such elements 
would have to have been, by the related cosmological myth of the 
"Big Bang", older than the earth, yet geological examination shows 
that they are found to have evolved through physical processes 
which have occurred within natural structures here on earth. If such 
elements had been part of the alleged Big Bang, they would have 
fully decayed before now. On the other hand, if such elements are 
in the process of being continually evolved by natural conditions 
within earth, as well as in outer space, through electrical, magnetic 
and other physical forces, the reasons for their presence is more 
reasonable. I don't think this is any surprise to the national security 
elite. Something else is going on, and someone else knows it. 

If non-radioactive elements are converted into radioactive ones 
by the forces of nature, what are these processes? In 1937, in one of 
Tesla's famous birthday announcements1, Tesla stated that he had 
developed a process for the "manufacture" of radium (transmutation 
from other elements), which was so efficient that it could be sold for 
$1.00 per pound. He also announced that he had "absolutely 
developed" a system for the interstellar transmission of energy. He 
said he had been working in "several laboratories", but refused to 
disclose their locations. His working model, he said, "...employs 
more than three dozen of my inventions. It is a complex apparatus, 

1New York Times, July 11, 1937 (pg. 13, col. 2) 

30 


an agglomeration of parts." It could convey "...several thousand 
units of horsepower to other planets, regardless of the distance", 
traveling "...through a channel of less than one-half of one-millionth 
of a centimeter." Further, he said, "...it is not an experiment. I have 
built, demonstrated and used it. Only a little time will pass before I 
can give it to the world." 

That time never came. In less than six years, his death occurred 
in the presence of two FBI agents and a German nurse2, and the 
Nazis had his plans under active development as early as 1934. 

These facts demonstrate that even in his 80s, in 1937, Tesla 
was involved in secret research at several undisclosed laboratories, 
on technology which today remains highly classified, yet neither the 
general public nor anyone at the International Tesla Society seemed 
to have any idea as to the details, since they had been concealed 
from us by the "powers that be". In fact, the CIA itself had a hand 
in the founding of the International Tesla Society in Colorado 
Springs in 1986, to avoid the contingency of Tesla's electrodynamic 
discoveries coming to light. When this began to happen, the society 
was folded up. 

Through some ingenious investigating, it is possible to 
reconstruct some of the facts. In focusing on just Tesla's publicly 
available technology, it is obvious that, even in it, there is the air of 
the fantastic, the almost incredible. Taking this a step further, it is 
possible to reconstruct much of the unknown Tesla discoveries from 
available sources, in order to see what has been carefully hidden 
from us by our own government and the corporate fascists who 
control it. 

Tesla's Extraction of Cosmic Energy 

According to Tesla, the ether is not an "energy source", since 
it is composed of tiny independent "carriers immersed in an 

2John J. O'Neill, Prodigal Genius. The Life of Nikola Tesla, John J. McKay Company, Inc. NY 
(Nov. 1944) 


insulating fluid"3. The ether, therefore, is a "medium" through 
which energetic transferences and transmutations can be effected, 
and electric and magnetic "tubes of force" can be created and 
carried into a body from space, giving it momentum to propel it. 

"Cosmic radiation" is not the ether, but "starlight"—what 
Tesla called the "Primary Solar Rays".4 This extremely high- 
frequency light—of much tinier wavelength than visible light, U.V., 
X-rays, and gamma rays (also emitted by our sun and other 
stars)—is the ZPR. Tesla stated that the Zero Point Radiation gives 
rise to secondary radiations through impact with the cosmic dust of 
space, which are commonly called "cosmic rays" today. 

In 19355 Tesla objected to the observations of the German 
radiologist, Dr. Werner Kolhoester, saying his observations were 
another confirmation of his own theory of cosmic rays originally 
advanced inl896, but asserted that Kolhoester's 1935 theory was 
erroneous, because light is a wave motion of definite velocity (C), 
determined by the elastic force and density of the "medium", while 
cosmic rays are "...particles with velocities determined by the 
propelling force...", which therefore could be much slower or faster 
than that of light. Since the velocities of the two radiations would 
not (and could not) coincide, Kolhoester's observations which 
coincided with the light observed, would not be accurate. Here, 
Tesla distinguished between the "cosmic radiation" he proposed in 
1896, which was particles, which were propelled by ultra-high- 
frequency "primary solar radiation", which I equate to the ZPR, 
which are light rays traveling at C. Because of their extremely high 
voltages levels and frequencies, they can propel "cosmic dust" 

3T.C. Martin, The Inventions, Researches and Writings of Nikola Tesla,The Electrical 
Engineer, 
New York (1894) 


4 Nikola Tesla (as told to Alfred Albelli) Radio Power Will Revolutionize the World, Modern 
Mechanics and Invention (July, 1934) 

5Nikola Tesla, German Cosmic Ray Theory Questioned, New York Herald Tribune (March 3, 
1935) 

32 


particles faster than C, when of sufficiently high voltage levels and 
frequency. 

In his "objection" letter of 1935, at a time when he was 
involved with the German "p2" project which I wrote about in 
Pentagon Aliens, Tesla gave a clue to his electrodynamic space 
propulsion system, which if one is to take Tesla's statements 
seriously, means that a "particle"—or a ship—in space can be 
propelled very fast by electromagnetic wave radiation—light 
waves—which in this case are the "Primary Solar Rays", the ZPR. 

The Primary Solar Rays (the ZPR) are ubiquitous in the 
universe and in direction of approach at a given point, with 
frequencies so high that there is normally no reaction with atomic 
matter, being able to pass through "...thousands of miles of solid 
matter..."6, and therefore can approach an object on earth even from 
the direction of the ground. This makes this invisible "solar energy 
source" available around the clock, though it is said to slightly vary 
cyclically. This radiation should not be confused with so-called 
"photon energy", which is a Relativist fantasy involving "corpuscles" 
or "particles" of light. What a laugh. 

In the on-going Relativist theory, Wolfgang Pauli, in 1933, 
invented the neutrino theory, in response to Niels Bohr's radical 
finding that, if experiments say so, the Law of Conservation of 
Energy does not hold for 

("beta" or electron) emission and 
absorption processes.7 Pauli's theory sought to explain a loss of heat 
energy in beta decay, which the Relativist theory was unable to 
account for or measure in such processes as K-capture, in which a 
neutrino is emitted when a proton is converted into a neutron. The 
reverse process is the conversion of a neutron into a proton, thus 
emitting a beta particle (electron) and sucking a neutrino back into 
the atom from surrounding space. Other particles are involved, but 

6Nikola Tesla, Radio Power, etc. (Supra) 

7Gamow, George, Thirty Years that Shook Physics, Doubleday & Company, Inc., Garden City, 
New York (1956) 


these are the ones of interest. It should be of interest to you that 
Bohr was not a Relativist, and held a sort of "free-energy" view. It 
is also interesting to note that Bohr attended the opening of the 
Tesla Museum in Belgrade. Without Bohr's work, the A-bomb 
would have been impossible at that time. 

The acquisition of energy from the ZPR was regarded by Tesla 
as a "step-down" process, in which the super-high-frequency light 
waves were stepped down to a more familiar and usable form, such 
as 'normal' radioactivity, heat or electrical energy. In the K-capture 
process, an element is transmuted into another element, for 
example, iron to manganese—and in the reverse 
process—manganese to iron. Monoenergetic neutrinos are ejected 
in the first process, and sucked back into the iron in the reverse 
process, but what happens to the damned X-radiation emitted in the 
first half of the reversible process, Einstein? And how is it 
mysteriously "replaced" in the reversed half? 

The neutrino explanation has always appeared as a loophole in 
the Relativist theory, since the missing momentum and heat, and 
misconceived "photon energy" (actually electromagnetic light wave 
radiation), were impossible to explain without the invented neutrino 
theory. Furthermore, since the neutrino is a neutral particle, it is 
composed of tiny positive and negative charges which do not exist 
according to Relativism, since Relativism holds that the electron is 
"indivisible", as the main foundation of quantum mechanics. With 
this argument, I now have some of my Relativist friends denying the 
existence of neutrinos. 

In contradicting their own theory, admitting that the tinier 
positive and negative charges composing the neutrinos exist, the 
Relativists inadvertently acknowledged the "building blocks" of 
electrons and protons. As such, neutrinos appear to be the aether. 
Since neutrinos are so tiny, they must have the capacity to react 
with the ZPR, in bringing about so-called "nuclear radioactivity". In 
so doing, what are the nuclear characteristics of an element which 
produces radioactivity naturally? How can a non-radioactive 
element be made to mimic these qualities, in artificially-induced 


radioactivity"? If neutrinos are prevalent in K-capture 
(transmutation), and its reversal, it seems that an element which is 
made to oscillate between two elements (to transmute and de- 
transmute), would have to react with the ZPR. Since there is excess 
energy involved, as the neutrinos (ether carriers) move in and out, 
energy is being transferred to and from the element, the ZPR, and 
the ether. 

We know that synthetic radioactivity can be induced by 
exposing an element to appropriate radiation, which is only a 
reversal of the process which initially created the radiation, as a 
verification of Tesla's theory. 

In K-capture in iron, when the K-shell electron passes into the 
nucleus, converting a proton into a neutron, not only is a 
monoenergetic neutrino emitted, but also an X-ray, when the vacant 
K-shell takes on another electron. Though the iron atom is now a 
manganese atom, and has emitted energy, it has the same mass 
number. Shouldn't the mass number reflect the loss of energy? 
Where is your damned "E = MC2?" There is also the question, 
"Where did the incident particle beam energy which induced the K-
capture go? If the neutrinos taketh away, they also giveth back, as 
"carriers". Of course, one can say that the electrons involved do not 
weigh enough to be reflected in the mass number. The Relativists 
admit (or assert) that the neutrinos carry energy, just as the aether 
carriers do. Recent Japanese experiments showed that neutrinos are 
plentiful in space. The greatest source of free-energy appears to be 
the ZPR. 

If the number of neutrons in a disintegration product (the atom 
transmuted to) is too small compared to its number of protons, the 
nucleus will tend to reduce its charge by one unit by positron 
emission, and will always have 1 Mev less kinetic energy than if beta 
decay had occurred.8 Since a light element (below atomic number 
19) will transmute in U.V. light, radioactivity in light elements can 
be induced very easily. When Joliot and Curie bombarded aluminum 

8R. E. Lapp and H. L. Andrews, Nuclear Radiation Physics, Prentiss-Hall, Inc., New York 
(1950). 


with alpha particles, they observed that neutrons and positrons were 
emitted. When they removed their alpha source, the positron 
emission did not cease, but decreased exponentially with time, as if 
the aluminum were a naturally radioactive element, for a period of 
three minutes.9 The positron will always carry 1 Mev kinetic energy, 
and may be used for energy production. Since this process can be 
effected by use of an U.V. incident particle beam on the light 
elements, and will produce positrons at 1 Mev of kinetic energy, it 
may be used in what I call "leapfrog technology", which can be used 
for transmutation processes which will manufacture elements in 
much greater quantities than could be effected by the huge 
accelerators at such places as U.C. Berkeley. 

Based on the Tesla Primary Solar Ray theory, using the K- 
capture process, this is my explanation for a device I call Free Energy 
Surprise (© 1997, Wm. R. Lyne, ISBN 0-9637467-6-6, $10.00, 
Creatopia Productions, General Delivery, Lamy, New Mexico 
87540, Tel/Fax 505-466-3022), a technical report which includes 
a set of plans and documentary photos. 

I got the idea for this device from a statement by Nikola Tesla, 
concerning "special" uses for iron, to capture the ZPR/Primary Solar 
Rays. Whether or not this is exactly what Tesla meant, I believe it 
verifies his statement concerning special properties of iron. 

The device, composed of steel pipe and bar stock (about 10 
lbs.), is stimulated with a 15 kv, center-tapped transformer. It 
operates in several modes, but in what I call the "hum" mode shows 
an input of 35 watts and a secondary activity of 42.6 kw, operating 
at or beyond the approximate K-capture voltage on each leg, ca. 
7,110 volts (the K-capture voltage for iron), at the standard 60 cps. 
The low frequency current goes into the mass of the iron (not a 
'skin effect'). The iron seems to be going to manganese and back to 
iron, 60 times per second. This idea is based on what appeared to be 
the appearance of a purple area near the top of the pipe which I 
recognized to be the color of manganese dioxide. The extra electrical 

9Lapp and Andrews (Supra) 

36 


energy might be the product of interaction with the ZPR, the ether 
(neutrinos?), and the iron. Since manganese is the next element 
down on the periodic chart, with the same mass number as iron, it 
sounded like a reasonable hypothesis. The voltage is not really 
critical, as the effect could occur so long as the voltage passed 
through the K-capture voltage on its way up and down, and is only 
supposed to cause a somewhat more definite effect when it is right 
on the "absorption edge". 

It appears that the electrical energy in the secondary output 
circuit can be converted into usable electrical energy, especially by 
using a resonant transformer, tuned to the same, 60 cps frequency. 

Corporate-government disinformationists have already tried 
to debunk this device. One "debunker" inadvertently revealed the 
fact that he didn't actually do the experiment, when he described the 
device when assembled as weighing "two pounds". No reputable 
"scientist" could confuse "ten pounds" with "two pounds", so I 
knew he was lying. Naturally, his assessment was negative. He was 
either a lightweight, who didn't do the experiment as described, or 
a liar with a concealed agenda. This discovery may prove to be a new 
way to produce K-capture, and to transmute elements in a reversible 
process, by stimulation with simple, standard 60cps electric current, 
at or near the K-capture voltage, or at some other appropriate 
voltage, without the necessity to use an incident particle beam 
accelerator, vacuum chamber, etc. 

A good free-energy process, therefore, can use an 
element—conveniently a light element—as a "medium" to induce 
another "medium"—the ether, or another element—to interact with 
and acquire energy from the ZPR, which is then stepped down to 
either a synthetic radioactive output—which can be further stepped 
down to manageable electrical energy or heat—or perhaps converted 
more directly to electrical energy by some ingenious means. 

The attempted destruction and concealment of Tesla's work 
has now been exposed, and will soon be reversed. The factions 
which were responsible for this still exist through perpetuity, but will 
not be able to control the technology when it finally emerges. 


CHAPTER III - CONCEALED ENERGY:
The Second Lie of Thermodynamics


The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that any 
spontaneous process occurring in the universe leads to an overall 
increase in the entropy of the universe. This is an example of a 
"negative pregnant" science belief system, designed to conceal 
unlimited available energy in the universe. That makes it a Pretty 
Big Lie. It includes the "double-think" and contradiction that are 
the earmarks of bogus science which unfortunately becomes 
"establishment science", and is an insult to the ordinary, reasonable 
and prudent layperson's mind. 

It's as if some big shots sat down in 1919, lit up their Cubanos, 
and said: "This fellow, Nikola Tesla, has been talking about 
'environmental energy' which is unlimited and free. This is 
dangerous to our interests. The papers and magazines have been 
giving him too much attention. From now on, our media and 
institutions will support and promote only the works of those 
scientists who can produce excuses as to why the energy available to 
us is NOT unlimited, OR free." 

By the creation of a plethora of red herrings and negative 
pregnants—all of which chisel away at the citizen's awareness of the 
non-polluting energy available from the environment—a mass 
psychosis thought'Control system has been created in academic 
science, which trains young scholars to dismiss alternative views and 
to attack those who attempt to point these things out, as "pseudo- 
scientists". These young scholars then march out into the world 
with their minds steeled against the possibilities available in nature 
and in creative science, while preaching the monopoly-designed 
gospel of fossil fuel consumerism. 

A "negative pregnant" is a denial which implies an affirmation 
of a substantial fact1, and hence is beneficial to an opponent, 

1 Steven H. Gifis, LAW DICTIONARY 

38 


because it is "pregnant" with an affirmation. A number of these 
denials, "pregnant" with affirmations of certain alternatives, are 
intended to convince the future scientist that all energy must be 
bought at a filling station or from public utility corporations, at 
continually inflating prices, extorted by contrived "energy crises". 
Coercive monopolist interests own the banks, the energy 
companies, producers of mineral fuels for the generation of power, 
as well as many other essential industries. They also own the mass 
media, which controls information and disseminates propaganda 
designed to maintain their status quo of obsolete technology and 
archaic resources. They are well represented in educational 
institutions, control endowments and grants, and essentially control 
the writing and publication of science texts used to train new 
scientists.2 

The Second Law of Thermodynamics contradicts the First Law 
of Thermodynamics (the Law of Conservation of Energy), because 
it says that energy is being destroyed through "entropy". There are 
no contradictions in reality. The young scientist and the seeker of 
truth is encouraged to continue to seek answers, and to reject 
devious and deceitful concepts and theories designed to close off 
new possibilities. 

The Second Law of Thermodynamics is a red herring, a 
negative pregnant denying any rational alternatives. The real issue 
is not only whether or not the "rule" is correct, but whether the 
facts show that energy apparently produced by some reactions 
actually originates externally to the reaction, and is a conversion 
through matter, of Zero Point Radiation into usable form, as 
opposed to "conventional" reactions which permit only the release 
of energy such as heat "stored" in matter. 

A major question is whether we have electrodynamic ZPR, 
(Tesla's concept) or a quiescent ZPE (the Relativist fantasy). The 
latter can be discarded as an internal contradiction of Relativism, 
and may be intended to conceal Tesla's electrodynamic space 

2 G. Edward Griffin, World Without Cancer, American Media (1974) 

39 


propulsion discovery, since the "ZPE" would never work the same 
way as the wave principle, to propel "particles" (or "ships") though 
space. ZPR is ubiquitous electrodynamic wave force carried by the 
ether. Because of its ultra high frequency, it is extremely penetrating 
and forceful once arrested, and can operate on ultra-fine levels in 
minuscule atomic and molecular reactions. 

We must first reject the concept espoused by the relativists, 
that matter is "destroyed" in the process of being used to do work 
(producing energy). Matter produces force, and while this force is 
"used" to do work, and though the force may become dissipated 
over a large area, this process does not represent the 'annihilation' 
of any matter, or of force produced by it, as asserted by the Second 
Law of Thermodynamics and related entropy theory. As force is 
used, new force is continually entering into a reaction, replenishing 
force dissipated by the reaction—and is still conserved in the form 
of momentum, IR storage, or radiant energy in ether-filled space. 

This brings us to the question of the 'origin' of new force, in a 
ubiquitous form available to all matter being replenished by it, 
allowing it to react again. This is the conservation of matter and 
force, what I call the "Theory of the Conservation of Perpetual 
Motion and Force". 

The replenishment of expended force in a region of space is 
apparently the result of an exchange of forces, weak for strong or 
vice-versa. A weak force can be converted into a stronger force, 
which will do more work in the same period of time. Whenever a 
weaker force, such as kinetic force (gravitational) is converted into, 
or exchanged for, a stronger force, such as an electromagnetic one, 
the force is 1040 times stronger.3 Since this force is so much 
stronger, it will do more work in the same period of time, in fact, 
zillions and zillions of times more work. Where does this increase in 
force originate? The source of this "new" ubiquitous force is of 
course the ZPR, which makes the energy density in a small region 
of space so high that I won't even bother to say. 

3 Gamow, Gravity 

40 


This processes repeated throughout the universe, automatically 
replenishing areas of space in which the force has been dissipated 
through a lower order of reaction, because there is a tendency 
toward equilibriation. The sun sends out electromagnetic radiation, 
electric current and magnetism. The sun also receives ZPR, electric 
current and magnetism from elsewhere, which replenishes the force 
expelled, maintaining its equilibrium in perpetuity. 

A good example of this circuitous process is when atmospheric 
oxygen combines with carbon and hydrogen in coal combustion, 
breaking HC bonds and producing CO2 and H2O, with a release of 
IR radiation, in a sustained combustion-reaction. This is possible 
because the HC bonds are weaker than the CO and HO bonds, so 
the stronger bonds are formed. This is a replacement of 'looser', 
weaker (electrostatic) bond/force, with a 'tighter' stronger 
(electrostatic) bond/force, releasing heat (IR radiation entrapped in 
the O, H and C, which is 'squeezed out' when the new, 'tighter' 
bonds are formed). The CO2 is then available for plants, which 
absorb the C and free the O in photosynthesis, driven also by solar 
radiation and the ZPR. The oxygen is then available again for 
combustion-reactions and the carbon becomes part of plant HC 
compounds, eventually becoming coal beds again. The H2O is also 
utilized in photosynthesis, releasing more oxygen. Repeat, ad 
infinitum. 

The bonds appear to be electrostatic ones. The 'breaking' of 
electrostatic bonds should not account for the heat released, as a 
conversion product of electrostatic force. The heat is IR radiation 
which has been 'stored' in the atomic space between the nuclei and 
electron clouds, as bouncing and reflecting radiation, until the 
electron clouds are 'opened' during new bond formations. When the 
new bonds are stronger, the reaction is exothermic (heat-releasing), 
and when weaker, they are endothermic (heat-absorbing), because 
the stored IR radiation apparently stretches the bonds and weakens 
them. 


"THE UNIVERSE IS WINDING DOWN"
(To the tune of "London Bridge is Falling Down") 


One of the most pronounced trends since the accelerated 
'media-advent' of Relativism (around 1919), has been an emphasis 
on instilling the false idea in physics that the universe is "winding 
down", progressively "using up" the energy it possessed at its 
"beginning". 

In 1916 Einstein had devised a static model of the universe, 
having uniform density but with space allegedly "curved" by the 
presence of matter, so that it had a finite volume. In order to justify 
this steady-state universe, so that gravitation did not collapse it, 
Einstein invented a repulsive force between masses, to equally 
balance the "gravitational attraction". How convenient. 

In 1917 de Sitter purportedly "found" a further solution to 
Einstein's equation, an expanding universe concept (now called the 
Big Bang Theory), which would have a "vanishing density" due to 
the constant expansion. Einstein's career, and the income of the oil 
companies, really took off. This help from de Sitter was 'really what 
the doctor ordered' for Einstein's theory and the oil companies. 

The purported discovery of the "red-shift" of the galaxies was 
used to further the expanding universe concept. The time elapsed 
since the "beginning of the expansion" is taken as the age of the 
universe, and is considered to be the reciprocal of Hubble's 
Constant4—about 1010 years—but the theory was flawed by the fact 
that the astrophysically-determined age of the oldest star clusters in 
our galaxy is about 16 x 109 years, about twice Hubble's Constant. 

In his 1891 lecture before the A.I.E.E.5, Tesla had stated that 
"enormous electrostatic forces" which emanate from the earth, 
"rigidify" the ether within earth's electric field as it moves through 
space. These rapidly varying, enormously powerful electrostatic 

4Hubble, E. P.: "The Realm of the Nebulae", Yale U. Press, New Haven, Conn., 1936. 

5 Nikola Tesla, Lecture Before the A.I.E.E., Columbia College (1891) 

42 


emissions (which Tesla called "microwaves"), which "rigidify" the 
ether, causes the ether near the earth to travel along with it. 

The same thing applies to other planets in space. The "red 
shift" observed in light passing near bodies in space, as the alleged 
basis for an "expanding" universe, is apparently due to a refraction 
of the light by this rigidified ether, a phenomenon which does not 
require the presence of an atmosphere. It is similar to Faraday's 
"magneto-optical effect". This shoots down the Big Bang Theory. 
The Michelson-Morley experiments were based on an ether 
which was dynamic in relation to the earth. They tried to detect a 
"drift" in the ether as the earth moved through space. Since the 
ether near the earth is rigidified and carried along with it, there is no 
relative motion to detect, no 'drift'. But the ether is relatively 
dynamic farther away from the earth. This means that the 
Michelson-Morley experiments, based on a "dynamic ether" 
concept, and conducted on the surface of the earth, could not 
possibly have detected an "ether drift", because the ether is not 
'drifting' on the earth's surface, where they did the experiments. 

Meanwhile, the ether near the planets and bodies in space 
which showed the "red shift" is not only rigidified by the 
"microwaves" emitted from those bodies, and subject to "magneto- 
optical effects", but the bodies are also in relative motion in respect 
to the light passing near them, through their rigidified ether. These 
facts were ignored by the Relativists, naturally. 

In 18926, Tesla demonstrated before the Institution of 
Electrical Engineers in London, how a column of gas was rigidified 
by a rapidly alternating current. He also told them how, prior to 
that, his tests had shown that the space between two metal plates 
subjected to currents of "sufficiently high voltages and frequencies" 
had become "solid state" (i.e., would support the plates, which 

6Nikola Tesla, Experiments with Alternate Currents of High Potential and High Frequency 
(a lecture delivered to the Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, 1892) 

43 


weighed several pounds each).7 This was the basis for his 
electro dynamic space propulsion discovery. The British science 
journals didn't bother to print a word about these momentous 
discoveries, as far as I have been able to determine. 

The steady-state theory of Bondi and Gold8 gave the universe 
an infinite past and an infinite future, but unfortunately retained an 
expanding universe concept, in which the "loss of matter" by the 
expansion is exactly compensated by the "creation of new matter", 
so that new galaxies are created and only the average galaxy "needs" 
to have an age equal to "Hubble time" (how convenient). 
While the infinity of past and future are commendable (after all, 
there will only be a present, forever), the idea that a galaxy "needs" 
to have an age equal to Hubble time is teleologicaL 

These are truly infantile notions, which are used by the 
Relativists to talk us out of apprehending energy available from the 
environment. They show a negativistic "dead end" cosmology, 
which discourages physics creativity. 

Firstly, it is a begged question that the universe had a 
beginning, indicating not only inferior intelligence—people in 
science who can't conceive of a universe without a beginning and 
end, like childhood stories such as Little Red Riding Hood and the 
Big Bad Wolf—while insisting on a false philosophy in science, 
serving an ulterior purpose, say, that of the energy cartels. 

Secondly, the "Big Bang" cosmology—the supposed beginning 
of the "expansion", or "winding down"of the universe (another 
begged question)—is linked to physics by the Second Law of 
Thermodynamics and entropy theory in such a way as to convince 
us that the universe had already began to unwind before it barely got 
out of the Big Bang 'womb', and that all matter is progressively 
getting "all tuckered out" as time goes on, so that available energy 

7T. C. Martin, Inventions, Researches and Writings of Nicola Tesla, 1894, Chapter XXV - 
Introduction -The Scope of the Tesla Lectures 

8 Bondi, H.: "Cosmology", 2nd ed., Cambridge U. Press, London/N.Y., 1961. 

44 


is constantly diminishing. The main objective of this cosmology 
seems to be to induce a quiet surrender to continually inflating fuel 
prices at the gas pump and at the public utilities corporations, as 
"inevitable consequences". 

I personally do not believe in an expanding or finite universe, 
or that it had a "point of origin" or will ever end. It has always 
existed, is infinite, and will last for eternity. Energy is never 
destroyed, and is conserved in the constant motion of matter and 
radiation in space-transit, representing infinite, available energy 
forever. 

I believe in the idea that, when force is exerted on one entity 
by the action of another, causing a change (i.e., "work"), that the 
force does not "disappear" into nothingness or become "locked up" 
within matter, to remain "unavailable" forever, as the Relativists 
would have us believe. Most working physicists don't use Relativist 
theory for anything anyway, the main damage being done to the 
public which reads the media-mogul publications continually 
extolling this false belief system. 

If the Big Bad Wolf had eaten Little Red Riding Hood, her 
"energy" would not have become "unavailable" through 'entropy*. 
Without really explaining themselves, the Big Bangers have told us 
that matter gets neutralized, and can't do any more work, forever, 
through a mystical "entropy" principle. This is based on the fallacy 
that matter contains energy in the first place. Matter in motion has 
momentum (kinetic, mechanical energy), and can react in electric 
and magnetic fields to produce electromagnetic energy, but does not 
"contain" energy. It may also store heat energy, as previously 
explained, but this energy—electromagnetic heat radiation—is not 
an integral part of matter, and nothing is "lost" by its release. 

Energy is not an entity, but only a potential, the "ability to do 
work", which cannot 'disappear forever', since it exists only as a 
quality possessed by matter to store or affect the conversion of 
electromagnetic force, under certain circumstances, not something 
which exists in a quantitative form within matter itself. An accepted 
'law' of modern physics is that there are three levels of force, the 


gravitational force (weakest), electromagnetic force (medium) and 
nuclear force (strongest). A radioactive magnet, or a radioactive 
chunk of lodestone, can possess all three. I believe all these to be 
different levels of reaction by matter with the ZPR, representing the 
densest electromagnetic force, because it is produced by the 
enormous forces within stars. Stars, in turn, like all other bodies in 
space, are receivers of ZPR, which react at the highest (nuclear) 
level. 

According to the Relativists, in order for energy to become 
"unavailable" (i.e., "used up" forever), it is commonly believed that, 
in its 'last, final work', the "process" through which it reacted, 
somehow became "irreversible". Now let me see....what would such 
an "irreversible process" be? Is it the "process" which is irreversible, 
or is it the "state of matter" which is? I rack my brain, but fail to 
find an answer. I do not know of one single irreversible process! I 
think what these 'scientists' really mean, is that the availability is 
hard to follow, or a process is hard to reverse, or that they are 
unable to think of a convenient way to reverse it, or that they fail to 
understand the actual process, or that they fail to realize that matter 
is not destroyed or irreparably damaged by being used to produce 
energy, and may actually improve with use. 

If a process is reversible to begin with, it should always remain 
reversible, and it appears to me that matter is not irreversibly 
changed by an energy process of any known kind, so what the 
Relativists appear to be trying to say, is that a different process—an 
'irreversible' one— whenever it is substituted for a 'reversible' 
process, will fail to produce energy. To my knowledge however they 
have failed to identify an irreversible process. Their inability to 
identify such a process is a critical part of their theory. If all the 
atoms in the original process still exist, the Relativists have been 
lying to us. 

Certain processes have been identified as "reversible" ones. 
That has to do with creativity and ingenuity, when done by a 
human. Other processes, which scatter the matter in such a way that 
it is contaminated, or is so diffuse that it can't be gathered up again, 


make it practically a "non-reversible" one, but not necessarily an 
"irreversible one". These are the kinds of processes that the cartels 
prefer that we use, so they can sell us some more of the fuels or 
other by-products of the process, at an increasingly hefty profit, and 
we dirty up the environment with waste and pollution. 

It all seems to come down to the relative creativity of the 
technique used. If there is such a thing as an irreversible process, 
and a person wants to generate energy using the same matter, over 
and over, he should make certain to avoid a non-reversible, dirty, 
cartel-desired process, and use a clean reversible process, which 
captures the ZPR and produces no waste. 

There are numerous 'free energy' inventions which use this 
principle. Matter doesn't 'get tired', 'irreparably damaged', or 
'irretrievably locked up' on being used. It may become contaminated 
with other matter which is inconsistent with its use in a particular 
reversible process, but it can be purified and reused. 

A simple example of a reversible process which uses the same 
matter to produce energy over and over would be a hydrolysis 
process which produces a stoichiometric oxygen-hydrogen mixture 
derived from water, which is combusted and used to drive a turbine, 
after which the water vapor is condensed to water again, and is 
reused in the production of the stoichiometric gas mixture, over and 
over, ad infinitum. There are several ways to separate the oxygen 
and hydrogen which use less energy than that produced by the 
combustion-reaction. This is reasonable, considering the fact that 
the external energy which actually drives the process is the ZPR. 
The reaction is triggered by hydrolysis, to 'set up' the water in a 
state-change, for the ZPR reaction. The process can be enhanced by 
use of certain catalysts, metals and geometric arrangements, which 
take advantage of the best use of physical forces. 

Contrary to the idea that energy continually becomes 
unavailable, there is some validity to the idea that matter being used 
in a reversible process to produce energy may actually become 
"conditioned" and improve with repeated use. 


Advent of the "SMS" 

Henceforth, I will refer to what I call the "Standard Model 
Scientist" in singular, abbreviated archetypal form—"SMS". Since 
SMS is an archetype, composed of all Standard Model Scientists, 
who are apparently of like mind, possessing a sort of "collective 
consciousness" due to government thought-control, with a peculiar 
kind of scientific tunnel vision, all such scientists are faithfully 
embodied in my SMS. 

SMS sees "isolated systems" within the universe, when 
convenient, which are unaffected by external forces or matter, yet 
considers the universe as a whole an "isolated system", whenever 
that is convenient. Isolated from what? If the universe were finite, 
what would there be to isolate it from? This is contradiction on the 
grandest scale: Isolated systems within an isolated universe which is 
finite. This is another negative pregnant which has become a begged 
question through the continual, unquestioned acceptance by SMS. 
The only thing apparently isolated (from reality), is the brain of 
SMS. 

Looming very large in the mind of SMS is the Second Law of 
Thermodynamics—sometimes referred to as the "Law of 
Degradation of Energy", because of the entrained theory that 
"entropy", in an "isolated system", is increased by "irreversible 
processes" involving energy changes, and that, therefore, the sum of 
total "available energy" "within" the universe, tends to decrease. 
Hmmm...now let's see...decreasing energy in the universe...equals 
increasing prices at the gas pump...equals more money and power 
for the greedy monopolists who guarantee jobs for compliant 
scientists. The way that SMS couches "entropy" (a negation) in 
such terms as "increasing", is a negative pregnant, or maybe a better 
term is "pregnant negation". "Doublespeak"9 has certainly been 
enshrined in the science field. 

9 George Orwell, 1984 (1949) 

48 


There are at least eight things in particular with which I 
disagree, as false assumptions and begged questions, in this "negative 
pregnant belief system": 

1. The concept that matter, per se, contains "energy"; 
2. The concept of "increasing entropy", as a "law of 
physics"; 
3. The concept of an "isolated system"; 
4. The concept of an "irreversible process"; 
5. The concept of the universe as an "isolated system"; 
6. The concept of the universe as a "finite system"; 
7. The concept that the universe had a "beginning" or 
"origin"; 
8. The concept that the universe will have an "end" or will 
"disappear". 
It should be noted that SMS has boxed in "available energy" 
with negative pregnants and begged questions, to eradicate it, but 
the pregnant affirmations are still there. I believe that 1. through 8. 
above are all false assumptions. Without a doubt, they are all 
negative pregnants, there being no such thing as being "half' 
pregnant". 

Entropy, in thermodynamics, is usually given a special 
mathematical treatment by SMS, in which a quantity is ascribed to 
an "isolated system", which quantity purportedly expresses the 
degree to which the energy of that "isolated system" has ceased to 
be "available energy". Again, a denial of available energy in the 
universe forever. In this respect, I would like for you to notice how, 
because available energy has been made to appear to be 
unavailable—because it has somehow become irretrievably 
"dissipated", "locked up in matter", or "tuckered out"—that SMS 
begs the question that it is "unavailable" forever, simply because 
certain matter is no longer capable of immediate reaction in the 
laboratory, or of use in your car, even though we know that so- 
called "dissipated energy"—especially heat and other radiation—has 


affected other matter in such a way as to perform work whenever 
that other matter is involved in energy changes or reactions. 

We also know that, while such things as carbon have been 
oxidized to CO2 during combustion, some of it is subsequently 
absorbed by plants, freeing the pure oxygen back into the 
atmosphere, while the plant retains the carbon, by which it 
eventually becomes available for combustion again, along with the 
oxygen. This process, photosynthesis, is driven not only by ordinary 
solar radiation, but also by what Nikola Tesla called the "Primary 
Solar Rays", a ubiquitous, extremely high frequency radiation 
produced by the enormous forces in stars, now generally called 
"Zero Point Radiation." Tesla created power generators which 
converted it into other, usable forms. There appears to be nowhere 
in the universe where this energy is "unavailable", so there must be 
no isolated systems. SMS has a "catcha-22" however, because he can 
say that any system which shows a reaction to the ZPR is not an 
"isolated" one, but this is another negative pregnant which admits 
that the ZPR exists. 

Isolated Systems and Irreversible Processes Forever? 

SMS's special mathematical treatment considers all quantities 
ascribed to "isolated systems" to be aspects of a single, physical 
magnitude, and concludes that "...any physical system when left to 
itself always increases its entropy, and therefore decreases its 
'available' energy." 

But what system is really "left to itself forever? A coal bed? 
What? SMS says the universe is an "isolated system." 

By applying this statement to the universe as a whole, as if it 
were an "isolated system", SMS naturally concludes from this 
completely unnatural presupposition that all energy processes in the 
universe are "irreversible". (Ooops! Someone forgot to wind the 
universe back up!) Is this really true, or might it be the result of 
looking at everything from an artificially negative viewpoint 
(because the corporate-state pays your salary)? 


It can be easily seen from these presuppositions that in order 
for us to be convinced that energy is in short supply in the universe, 
we must be taught to believe that (1) the universe is finite (i.e., 
isolated), and (2) that matter within the isolated universe is getting 
all tuckered out. 

In the case of absolute zero, SMS had a problem, since 
everything at absolute zero (except electrons, supposedly) is frozen 
in place, so it cannot "degenerate". In response to this apparent flaw 
in theory, an SMS named Nernst came to the rescue with his "heat 
theorem", which stated that all physical and chemical changes in a 
system at absolute zero take place at "constant entropy", so there is 
no "change in entropy" (called "isentropy"). He said this is also true 
of adiabatic processes, since they are "reversible processes". The 
problem with Nernst's theorem is that most adiabatic processes are 
reversed by external energy. This leads to another gross 
contradiction, which confirms the existence of ubiquitous ZPR 
(perish the thought that, in superconductivity, the magnetic field 
produced external to the superconductive ring, for example, is 
considered as "available energy", another apparent flaw in Nernst's 
theorem). If any energy reaction can be obtained externally to a so- 
called isolated system, maintained at absolute zero, with no change 
in "entropy", then Nernst's theorem is wrong, and the ZPR is 
affirmed. Otherwise, what could sustain such a reaction? After all, 
superconductivity does not destroy the magnetic field. If the current 
is alternating, the magnetic field is also, and even a steady magnetic 
field contains energy and will do work on moving charges. 

It is apparent that the very large and very small aspects of the 
Second Law of Thermodynamics are interdependent, so that, if the 
very small aspects are untrue, then the very large aspects must also 
be untrue. If the universe is not an "isolated system"....because no 
"system" is completely isolated from universal processes...then the 
"law" must be untrue. The burden of proof here is not on the person 
who assumes that the universe is infinite, since it apparently is, but 
rather on the person who believes it is finite, since it apparently 
isn't. This is an Ockham's Razor situation, which works against a 


finite universe concept. Who has seen the universe's "boundary", or 
proved that it has one? Science cannot be based on such speculation, 
especially where it is part of a "grand theory" used to conceal 
available energy not at the limits of the universe, but in our own 
immediate space. 

In reality, there appears to be no "isolated system" which is 
immune from external effects. This is especially true where we have 
penetrating cosmic rays, X-rays, UV, visible radiation, radio waves, 
IR, neutrinos, ether, magnetism and a ubiquitous form of radiation 
produced by stars which interpenetrates everything. This is also true 
of neutrinos, whose penetrating power is measured in light years 
through lead. Neutrinos are reabsorbed by mass which is undergoing 
K-capture process reversal, so neutrinos from perhaps the other side 
of the universe may affect the production and availability of energy 
within any so-called isolated system. Of course, SMS might argue 
that, since the K-capture process is a reversible one, it is not an 
isolated system. But there are no truly isolated systems, the 
argument being based on a false premise, since the K-capture 
process refutes it by showing the emission and absorption of 
neutrinos across vast regions of space and through other mass. 

ZPR may play a part in every single matter change, etheric, 
atomic or molecular. In view of this, it is difficult to imagine that 
any isolated system exists, except in the collective mind of SMS. It 
is difficult to imagine why SMS interposes such fictitious archetypal 
concepts as "isolated systems", in support of archetypal, collective 
delusions, other than his desire to keep his job as a physics prof. 

Tesla's theory of radioactivity is controversial only because it 
has been suppressed, in favor of the Relativistic theories of SMS, yet 
it is more reasonable than that of SMS, as applying to all energy 
changes in the universe. All energy changes—except those at 
absolute zero, or involving reversible process—are considered 
"irreversible", and result in "degradation of energy" according to 
SMS. 

Is there really such a thing as an irreversible process? SMS 
would argue that, "...sure, you might reverse an irreversible process, 


but that would take energy from an external source." This gives 
cause for wonder how a process which is irreversible forever could 
be reversed by anything at all. Since there is nothing in the universe 
which is really isolated, there is always available energy to reverse 
any process anywhere. ZPR energy originally converted within a 
system has never really disappeared, but still exists somewhere, 
within the system or external to it. After all, this energy is not really 
a thing, but rather a property of matter under the circumstances, no 
matter how slight, capable of transforming radiant force to another 
form. In reversing an 'irreversible' process with 'external energy', 
energy 'dissipated' by other processes can be conceived as being used 
to 'pay back' what was previously dissipated by a so-called 
irreversible process. If the sum total of all universal energy 
(force/matter/time) remains the same, it can never degrade. It is all 
just a matter of time. SMS confuses states of matter with energy. It 
is true that, due to a matter's state, it can react with the ZPR, or can 
be diminished in its ability to do so, but these states are all 
reversible. 

Disappearing Mass? 

In a nuclear reaction, such as that in which a quantity of 
"unstable" radium "spontaneously" emits powerful radiation into 
surrounding space and matter, SMS would say that the radiation is 
the product of "radioactive decay" as expressed by Einstein's 
equation, "E = MC2". According to this equation, the emission of 
a certain amount ("quanta") of radiation, at certain voltages (say 4.5 
Mev), over a certain time period, is equal to a certain portion of the 
mass of the radium, multiplied times the speed of light, squared. The 
equation says that the mass of the radium decreases by an amount 
equal to the "interconverted" radiant energy emitted, based on the 
assumption that matter and radiation are interchangeable. 

Since the uncontested 'minimum' age of the universe, 
according to SMS—notwithstanding the astronomically-determined 
ages of the oldest stars clusters in our galaxy—exceeds the purported 


atomic half-lives of any radioactive materials, it is confirmed that 
such materials were created within the earth through natural 
process, and that otherwise the atomic half-lives would long since 
have expired. In 1936, Nikola Tesla produced radium through 
transmutation, quickly, in pound quantities, with a process which 
he said was so cheap that it could be profitably sold for less than a 
dollar per pound.10 

As it emits its radiation and alpha particles (stripped helium 
atoms which have mass), the radium's mass does not shrink. Any 
gaseous emission—radon gas—maintains its mass, atom for atom, 
proton and neutron for proton and neutron, electron for electron, 
etc., all mass remaining constant and accounted for. Any so-called 
"decay product"—such as lead—has the same mass as the original 
radium, less any radon atoms or alpha particles emitted. The 
physical components merely become juxtaposed, and none of them 
"become" electromagnetic radiation. Where, then, has the energy 
come from? Tesla said it comes from the ZPR. He also said that 
matter and radiation are not interchangeable. He compared the 
difference between matter and force to the difference between the 
body and the mind, saying force is a "...function of matter", and 
that, just as a mind could not exist without a body, "...without 
matter, there can be no force."11 One cannot become the other. The 
energy is force carried by electromagnetic radiation, which never 
takes physical form as an entity of any kind. 

This process is explained by SMS as if no external energy of 
any kind is affecting the radium, when in fact, according to Tesla, 
it is interacting with its surrounding environment, matter and space, 
not only by emitting radiation, but by reacting to incoming ZPR. 
There is no missing mass—no one has proven that there is—so the 

10 Nikola Tesla, July 10, 1937 prepared statement, and July 11, 1937 interview, New York Times, 

p. 13, col.2. 
11

 Nikola Tesla Papers (Apr. 15, 1932), Rare Books and Manuscripts Library, Columbia 
University. 

54 


Einstein theory must be wrong. Radium is apparently "stepping 
down" the ZPR to gamma and X-radiation frequencies, just as Tesla 
said. Without a shrinking mass of radium, it has to be true, 
especially at the particular rates and levels of emission. 

The sun shines through my window and heats up a flagstone 
floor. The heat moves from the stone to the earth below and the air 
above. It 'dissipates', warming the air. The warm air rises to the 
ceiling, forcing colder air downward, 'doing work'. SMS considers 
this energy "unavailable", because it eventually dissipates, but the 
reality is, whether or not energy is available does not depend upon 
whether SMS can follow it, but on whether we have good reason to 
believe it will not be unavailable forever, or that matter is not 
irreparably damaged by use in an energy process. Even though the 
particular matter may not immediately bend to our will, due to the 
state that it is in or the place that it resides, it does not 'disappear', 
and may be processed for use again, or will become included with 
other matter, where it undergoes natural changes which eventually 
render it available for later reaction, whenever that may be. 

If the combustion of a hydrocarbon fuel such as gasoline yields 
CO2 and H2O, with the release of useful heat force converted from 
the ZPR by the expansion of hot gases which run an engine, how 
can this matter be made to react again? If the process to reverse the 
process is too complicated to put in our cars, we should use other 
processes which are not so complicated. 

I put gasoline into my tank, start my engine, and the gas and air 
mixture combusts in the cylinders to produce torque to drive my 
wheels. The exhaust emissions—CO, CO2 H2O vapor and 
heat—are only a rearrangement of the same fuel and air molecules 
which entered the engine. Once in the atmosphere, the chemical 
and heat units are sorted and concentrated or dissipated by nature. 
Some of the units are recombined by plants into the raw material for 
more gasoline refinement, and the cycle can be repeated, ad 
infinitum. The only thing we are talking about is the time that it 
takes natural processes to render the energy available to us again, or 
to do other work in nature, not the idea that the matter is "all 


tuckered out". All motion is perpetual, all energy is conserved, and 
all energy is free for the taking. We take what's available now, and 
wait for the rest, or we use reversible processes which speed the 
process up and eliminate "pollution", which is really no more than 
the random misplacement of matter in nature in such a way that it 
may interfere with natural processes beneficial to life forms, 
including us. 

SMS works for the banking, mineral or power and industrial 
cartels, or is a dupe, or maybe even all the above. A real scientist 
should know better, know the truth. 

Energy is not a "thing", and there is no such thing as "pure 
energy" in any physical form. Energy is force, created by matter in 
motion, exerted on other matter over time. Mass is moved by force, 
and gathers and exerts force through movement and reaction with 
the ZPR and other radiant force. The magnitude of a particular force 
and the length of time it is exerted on other matter determines the 
amount of work done. When force is exerted to produce heat, the IR 
radiation is the result of conversion from another type of radiation, 
such as magnetism, visible light or ZPR. An example is a campfire, 
in which carbonaceous matter (wood) is oxidized by fire. The 
chemical disposition within the matter and air maintains the 
reaction. The heat radiated does not represent destruction of the 
atoms of carbon or oxygen, but rather the conversion of radiant 
energy by the atoms when oxidation occurs, at which time the bonds 
between the atoms as they existed before are broken, and are 
replaced by new bonds with other elements. This causes a molecular 
change in which the atoms release stored IR radiation, or the ZPR 
reacts with the atoms and molecules, "stepping down" the ZPR, like 
a transformer, to IR radiation. There is also a possible release of 
stored IR radiation in the hydrocarbon fuel atoms and molecules. 

"Combusted" carbon is bonded to oxygen as CO2. "Combusted" 
hydrogen is bonded to oxygen as H2O, usually in a vapor state 
because of the liberated heat energy. This is not a 'final resolution' 
of the energy production potential of carbon and oxygen, since 
natural processes, driven by solar radiation, will eventually return 


both elements to a combustible state. The carbon and hydrogen may 
lie in the earth for a few million years, temporarily 'locked up' in a 
coal deposit, while the oxygen floats in the atmosphere, completing 
the "water cycle" and other process for eons. The energy in the coal 
deposits being formed is not 'unavailable' forever, but remains ever 
capable of combusting or eventually transmuting ZPR into IR 
radiation, again and again. 

SMS has no answer as to where the heat energy of combustion 
comes from, other than to say that it is a "release of the bonding 
energy" of the molecules. But if the bonding energy of oxygen, 
hydrogen and carbon, prior to the reaction, were weak enough to 
allow the reaction, then the 'tighter' bonds producing the CO2 and 
H2O in the reaction, represents an overall absorption of energy, with 
the result that the reaction should produce a cooling rather than a 
heating effect. It seems that the force produced by the combustion 
reaction—IR radiation—may come from a source external to the 
reaction, and could represents "free energy". The only change which 
has occurred in the matter is its ability to combust, which has been 
temporarily neutralized. 

SMS would have us believe that the "fuel"—oxygen, carbon 
and hydrogen—have decreased in available energy forever, but it 
simply isn't true, and the people who ultimately controlled and 
designed his academic curriculum knew it. 

Though it is not comforting to realize that all the gasoline and 
diesel fuel combusted in engines is still represented in the natural 
environment, it is a fact that the exhaust products are forever 
available for use again. A better idea is to use matter which doesn't 
have to leave our engines, by using exclusively reversible processes 
to do our work. 

Intuition tells us that hot water appears to "store" heat, but the 
fact is, heat transferred to water enters it in the form of IR 
radiation, and when the heat is extracted from the water, it will also 
be as IR radiation, in a reversible process, even when in direct 
surface contact with a heat conductor, in which case the atoms or 
molecules of the conductor become excited by contact with the 


water, as the conductor transfers the stored IR radiation. Since the 
IR radiation excites the water, this may allow it to react with the 
ZPR, until the same finite amount of heat is radiated back out, in a 
reverse reaction to that which occurred when the IR radiation 
entered the water. When hot water is carefully insulated in 
something like a thermos bottle, with a mirrored inner surface, the 
combination of heat-reflection, vacuum and insulation virtually 
isolates it from contact with an external heat conducting material 
(though not the entire universe). The IR radiation remains in the 
water, and virtually does not exit until the insulator is removed. 
Otherwise, it could 'jump' the insulator like microwaves can. The 
insulator does not stop the ZPR, but inhibits its reaction with the 
water, since the lower end of the 'step-down' process cannot be 
continued so long as the water retains maximum heat in a liquid 
state. 

There is no energy inherent in matter, only the inherent 
property possessed by matter to store radiant energy and to react 
when undergoing molecular and atomic state-changes, to react to 
radiant energy force, and to convert it to useful force to perform 
work, such as heating, lighting, communicating, and mechanical 
force. It is not matter alone which determines the availability of 
energy, but rather the states, and changes of states of matter, which 
give it the capacity to react to the universal ZPR and other matter. 

Lvne's Hypothesis 

As I said in 199312—based on my "Omni Theory" of 
1963—the only way the earth could have grown like it has, is 
through solar/ZPR-driven photosynthesis, through which ether has 
been assembled into the solid mass of most of the elements found in 
the earth's outer layers. 

Around 1961, I personally cut the samples of oil well drilling 

12William R. Lyne, Space Aliens From the Pentagon (1993, rev. 2nd ed., 1996); Occult. Ether 
Physics (1997; rev. 2nd ed., 1998) 


cuttings from ca. 20,000 feet beneath the surface of Reeves County, 
Texas, in a well drilled by my uncle, Roger Benton, for J. Evetts 
Haley, Sr. It was the first well to go beyond 20,000 feet. The 
samples represented cuttings from all the strata from the surface 
down to ca. 22,000 feet, I believe (if my memory serves me), all the 
strata contained the detritus of living things, essentially dependent 
on photosynthesis, either animal life remains, plant life remains, or 
minerals derived from these, through metamorphosis or natural 
transmutation. The universe must have a 'constant' of life-forms. 

According to my theory, the elements we have at our disposal 
are mostly the products of photosynthesis and metamorphosis over 
time, derived from the action of radiation on the ether, via plant and 
animal life, except for a small percentage of "space dust" (formed 
the same way on other celestial bodies or in space) which fell into 
earth's atmosphere. 

Since the elements we know of are found in deposits in the 
earth's upper layers, I assumed they were produced by 
photosynthesis or metamorphosis/transmutation from 
photosynthetic products, driven by the ZPR and other solar 
radiation, and that these deposits continue to the earth's center. The 
idea that earth has a "molten iron core" is a silly one, since the laws 
of thermodynamics would require that the surface would melt too. 

Having seen their pet Relativist theories shaken by my obvious 
facts, an article appeared in the Orlando Sentinel, carried also by the 
Santa Fe New Mexican on 7/30/01, under the headline, "NASA 
probe on mission to catch some rays." The article stated that a 
NASA solar probe called Genesis was scheduled to blast off on the 
30th, on a mission to "catch some rays"—to collect some samples of 
our sun's solar wind, and bring "them" home to scientists, thus 
allegedly marking the first time that "extraterrestrial material" has 
been returned from beyond the moon. 

Though this incidentally confirms my theory of at least some 
of our minerals, etc., by admitting that the elements on earth were 
"assembled" here (since they are not considered "extraterrestrial 
materials") the truth of the matter is, there is a lot of 


"extraterrestrial material" dropping into earth's atmosphere every 
day. For instance, I have some "black sands" which were most 
probably not formed on earth, because the elements in them could 
not have combined in the way that they did in earth's gravity field 
or atmosphere. In addition, there is no "mother lode" of mineral 
deposits that they could have weathered out of. 

The mission concentrates on cosmic "particles", which are not 
electromagnetic radiation, but composed of atoms propelled by solar 
radiation, as Tesla said in the 1890s. It also misses a real concern, 
the ether which is assembled into earthly mass under the influence 
of solar electromagnetic waves, especially of the ZPR. 

The $164 million spacecraft is intended to "shed light on the 
makeup and evolution of our solar system." It is hypothesized that 
the solar wind—a stream of charged atoms—contains the "same 
mix" of elements found in the sun's surface layers, which in turn is 
believed to mirror the contents of the sun's solar nebula. Two and 
a half years of sampling is expected to collect material weighing "no 
more than several grains of salt", and "should" contain "every 
element found naturally in the solar system". This apparently is 
intended to test or disprove my theory, yet no mention is made of 
me or my theory, of course. This may be intended as an attempt to 
prove an old theory, to disprove a new theory, without stating who 
originated the new theory or what it said. The old theory had no 
basis in the first place. All they have to do to confirm the facts, is to 
observe things here on earth. 

This seems to be a very expensive test of an hypothesis which 
is intended to prove that all the elements on earth were "shot" here 
from the sun, via the 'solar wind'. Otherwise, "Lyne's Hypothesis" 
presents a significant obstacle to the typical Big Bang mentality. 
Trying to imagine the sun building Jupiter in their way, 
demonstrates the improbability of such a theory. 

If the samples fail to contain a mixture of all the elements on 
earth, my theory can be presumed true, since no one to my 
knowledge has more reasonably explained where all our elements 
"came from". I maintain that through reaction with certain basic 


matter in space, earth had its beginning, building additional matter 
from the ether through reactions with the ZPR. This eventually gave 
rise to basic plant life, creating a gaseous atmosphere, and all this 
matter reacted with the ZPR to form other matter from the ether, 
composing the plants, gases absorbed and released by the plants, and 
matter in the earth. Eventually, animal life forms developed in a 
similar way. Certain other basic elements transmuted to others 
under the influence of cosmic radiation, and some additional 
elements were assembled from ether particles into atoms of different 
elements, until the elements were complete. 

The entire series could have begun with the simplest atoms, 
hydrogen, gathered from space. Considering the time that such a 
process could have taken, our galaxy has to be much, much older 
than Hubble's Constant. 

The final, most complex elements created represent the voltage 
limits of the ZPR's influence on the ether, and in a certain sense, all 
the processes involved in creating certain elements here on earth, 
duplicating conditions essential for the creation of the same 
elements elsewhere. The process is continuous, and even transmutes 
atoms in your body, especially those below atomic number 19. 

The process 1 have described does not create mass, but only 
collects and assembles tiny ether particles possessing tiny mass, into 
atoms, through the influence of the ZPR on the ether. The ether 
particles may be identical to neutrinos, which possess mass and carry 
momentum. Since my earlier books, Japanese experimenters have 
confirmed that neutrinos in great numbers are ubiquitous in space, 
which I think are sufficient to account for an "ether theory". Since 
many of these neutrinos are captured on earth, new mass is added 
to the earth. The Japanese seemed to have confirmed my theory. 

According to my theory, the sun and other stars are 
transmitters and receivers of ZPR, and hence 'build' their planets by 
supplying the radiation necessary to assemble the planetary elements 
from the ether, through reaction with initially small amounts of 
other simple basic 'seed' elements. 

The big question is, how could such "energy" continue to exist 


to supply power maintaining the perpetual motion of the universe, 
as well as for all processes of building atoms from the ether? The 
general opinion is that "energy gets used up" in a local region. But 
this energy (force) is continually replenished by the ZPR. 

Since all suns basically receive as much energy as they 
transmit, and since all energy (force, exerted over time) and atomic 
matter (assembled from the ether) is conserved—in the motion of 
matter (or ether), or in transient radiation in all of universal space, 
and since there is always ubiquitous available force from the ZPR, 
equilibrium is maintained in all regions of space, and all matter and 
motion is perpetual. This is the "Lyne Theory of the Conservation 
of Perpetual Motion and Force". 

According to Tesla13, in an 1891 lecture, rapidly varying 
electrostatic discharges from the earth ("microwaves") 'rigidity' the 
ether. This was based on reactions actually verified by Tesla before 
that 1891 lecture, which showed the ponderomotive behavior of 
mass under the various circumstances he described. In an 1892 
lecture in London14, he repeated the results of this research 
regarding the emission of electrostatic 'brush' discharges (negative 
electrostatic corona) by a conductive body, as it draws in the tubes 
of force (aligned ether carriers) which carry momentum, showing 
that when these tubes of force are dissolved in the body, they impart 
their momentum to the body in the direction of the emissions. 

According to Hannes Alfven15, a giant electric current travels 
through space along lines of "frozen magnetic force" from the sun 
to the earth, passes through the earth and back to the sun's equator, 
imparting "angular momentum" to the earth in its solar orbit. This 
was based on earlier research by Kristian Birkeland, who in 1895 

13 Nikola Tesla, Lecture Before the A.I.E.E., Columbia College, New York (1891) 

14Nikola Tesla, Experiments with Alternate Currents of High Potential and High Frequency 
(a lecture delivered to the Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, 1892) 

15Hannes Alfven, Existence of Electromagnetic Hydrodynamic Waves, Nature, vol. 150 (Oct. 3, 
1942), pp. 405-6 

62 


explained the aurora borealis as the effect of the currents later 
proven by Alfven, as they enter the earth's atmosphere where 
earth's magnetic field is almost vertical, causing a glow similar to 
that of cathode rays in a laboratory. 

J. J. Thomson16, in 1893, restated Tesla's earlier finding 
(without attribution), "...if moving tubes of force entering a 
conductor are dissolved in it, mechanical momentum is given to it 
at right angles to the tubes and to the magnetic induction", adding 
that this momentum is "...proportional to the vector product of 
electric and magnetic forces". This repeated what Tesla had said, 
since the momentum was proportional to the vector product of the 
electric and magnetic fields. 
Thomson also declared that "...the aether is a storehouse of 
mechanical momentum", based on "his" theory, concluding that 
"...the aether is itself the vehicle of mechanical momentum, of 
amount (1/4*pi C [D . B] per unit volume." As stated by Sir 
Edmund Whittaker17, in a steady (electrostatic or magnetostatic) 
field, the resultant stresses acting on a volume of the aether is zero, 
so that the aether is in equilibrium. But when the electric and/or 
magnetic field is variable, the resultant stress on the aether is 
consistent with Tesla's earlier, 1891 finding, and Thomson's 1893 
equation as stated above. 

Tesla's experiment had verified this, using "alternate currents 
of high voltage and high frequency", on the assumption that a 
changing field was essential to creation of the necessary stress upon 
the "medium" (the ether). What is more important, until Tesla's 
demonstration, using generators he brought along, the British had 
no idea of how to create the necessary high frequency fields. 

This, of course, was the basis for Tesla's electrodynamic space 
propulsion system. 

16J. J. Thomson, Recent Researches in Electricity and Magnetism (1893) p. 13 

17 Sir Edmund Whittaker, A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity, Revised and 
enlarged edition (1951), Thomas Nelson and Sons, Edinburgh 

63 


CHAPTER IV - SECRET SCIENCE: 

Thought-Control on The 

Professional Level 

Epistemology 

In order for the government to hide so many scientific and 
technological discoveries through its secrecy, there had to be a way 
to change the way people thought and what they believed. The 
formation of what one believes is usually limited by one's 
epistemology—what one's "first laws" are, what one's theory of 
knowledge or truth is. Is "seeing believing", or is "seeing just an 
illusion"? Philosophers have identified two basic theories of 
epistemology, which are the Platonic and the Aristotelian. We each 
usually choose one or the other, depending on what we are willing 
to accept as "the truth" or accept as "real". 

The Platonic epistemology, based on subjective "first-laws" 
("irreducible primaries", the beginning point for any philosophy), in 
this case states that there is a 'higher world of perfect forms', which 
we can never really see or know directly. According to this 
epistemology, the world around us is only an illusory "shadow" of 
these higher, perfect forms. Accordingly, we cannot have a direct 
knowledge of reality, because we can't depend on our senses as a 
reliable means of knowing reality. 

The Platonic epistemology's name is derived from Plato's Cave 
Analogy, which is about a person sitting at night in a cave, between 
a fire and a passing caravan. As the caravan passes in front of the 
fire—which lights an inner wall of the cave, and casts a shadow of 
the caravan on the wall—the viewer sees no more than a 'shadow of 
reality' (the shadow of the caravan). The caravan itself represents 
reality—the world of 'perfect forms'—which we are unable to see 
directly. 

This epistemology is usually typical of religious people, and of 
Relativists, the people who have been running 'official' physics since 
1919, maybe longer, I could never figure out what was stopping the 


man in the cave from leaving the cave and taking a look at the 
caravan directly. 

The Aristotelian epistemology has objective first-laws, which 
state as an irreducible primary that the senses are valid tools of 
cognition (thought). What you see or sense, can be accepted as true 
on its face, because visibility, in the three-dimensional space of 
perceived, physical reality, is based on scientifically measurable light, 
shadow, distance, height, weight, color, etc. The Aristotelian 
epistemology interposes no mystical, spiritual or religious concepts 
between the observer and reality, through which our knowledge 
must be filtered, such as Relativism seems to require. While non-
visible or non-perceptible forces and factors are recognized, if they 
can be measured as heat, light, sound, touch, or smell, or through 
the use of scientific instruments—which are technological 
extensions of our senses—these forces and factors are not "relative". 
As Ayn Rand said, "The facts of reality are what they are 
irrespective as to whether we are aware of them or not."1, and 
"Existence exists: A equals A." 

The disconnection of science from the Aristotelian 
epistemology, and the movement of scientific thought toward the 
Platonist epistemology, was accelerated particularly after 1919, 
when Relativism was projected into the vogue. Beginning about 
1910, the mega-corporate owners of the mass media had begun to 
control science and other educational curricula,2 particularly that of 
the medical schools, through the use of so-called "philanthropic 
grants", which were actually designed to benefit the corporations 
which had set up the foundations through which the grants were 
awarded. These Rockefeller grants set the stage for the controllers. 
The foundations eventually appointed compliant faculty 
members as officers, so that the foundations, corporations, and the 

1 Ayn Rand, Philosophy: Who Needs It? 

G. Edward Griffin, World Without Cancer, Part II, The Politics of Cancer Therapy, 
American Media (1974) 
65 


educational institutions were thoroughly invaginated with one 
another. This process, which began with grants favoring medical 
schools which taught a curriculum which advocated the use of 
products manufactured by the pharmaceutical subsidiaries of the 
Rockefeller family, soon also included the slanting of physics 
curricula toward Relativism, apparently intended to more directly 
favor the Rockefeller petroleum industry upon which the 
pharmaceutical industries were based. 
This use of the educational grant process completed the basic 
cycle of how the corporate giants began to control what scientific 
professionals were allowed to think and believe. Those who bucked 
the system just simply wouldn't be allowed to remain as part of it. 
In 1905 Albert Einstein re-introduced the world to the 
religious, 18th century Theory of Relativity. The media giants wasted 
no time in promoting this 'wrong turn' of physics, and by 1919, it 
was in full swing. Some of the beliefs advocated by Relativism border 
on insanity. 

The things some adults believe remind me of a little child who 
closes his eyes and thinks he is no longer visible. We play along with 
the gag and say, "What happened to Bobby? He disappeared! How 
did he do that!" But when adult scientists do it, it is no joke. 

It is hard for me to accept the fact that some adults believe in 
"other dimensions", but why should I be surprised, since the 
concept of "heaven" is one of another dimension, the existence of 
which people have been taught to believe for thousands of years. 
Heaven can be neither perceived nor ascertained objectively, and 
whether it exists or not depends upon the faith of the believer, 
rather than reason. To me, if you can prove something exists in this 
dimension-—the only dimension I recognize—it is IN this dimension, 
because I think there is only one dimension, called "reality." 

The fact that people have private thoughts, dreams, and ideas 
in their minds does not verify the existence of "other" dimensions, 
since we know that mental processes are held in the mind, in "our" 
dimension, as electromagnetic patterns, waves, currents, fields and 
data configurations, similar to how a computer stores information, 


except the mind's computer is a dynamic electromagnetic and 
organic one, rather than an exclusively inorganic, dynamic 
electromagnetic and mechanical one. 

Though some beliefs border on insanity, I don't think there is 
a correlation between insanity and belief, but there appears to be a 
correlation between induced neurosis and belief. An insane person, 
or a person with a neurological disorder, who sees, hears and feels 
things and beings which aren't there, does not do so because of his 
epistemology. He does so because his mind plays tricks on him, due 
to organic malfunctions in his nervous system and biochemistry, 
which cause visual, auditory and other sensory hallucinations real 
enough for him to believe. He does not say he "believes" these 
things, since he usually has no choice. In a way, such an 
hallucinating person, by accepting what he "sees" as "real", has an 
Aristotelian epistemology, except we know that he only "sees" the 
hallucinations in his mind. To whatever degree he recognizes them 
for what they are, he may still be a rational person. 

The concept that insanity is a disease was rejected by the 
director of the New York State Hospital, Thomas Szasz, as stated in 
his book, "The Myth of Mental Disease". Szasz destroyed the idea 
that an insane person was one who had "caught" a "disease" which 
could be "cured" through psychotherapy.3According to Szasz, "The 
classification of (mis)behavior as illness provides an ideological 
justification for state-sponsored social control as medical 
treatment".4 

In other words, if you mindlessly accept the misclassification 
by the state or the psychiatric profession, of a mental problem 
having a physiological, biochemical or neurological basis, as a 
"disease" or "illness", you may soon find yourself being treated to 
the "therapy of choice" of your local cops. 

3Thomas Szasz, The Myth of Mental Disease (1960) 

4Thomas Szasz, Manifesto (summary statement) (1998) 

67 


It had already been discovered about the time that Szasz wrote 
his book, that schizophrenia was not the result of a series of 
"traumas" which "split the personality", but rather of organic 
malfunctions in the patient's brain physiology and biochemistry. The 
cure might be pharmaceutical, but no amount of "mental hygiene" 
or "therapy" would cure it. Unbelievably futile effort has been 
expended on "psychoanalysis" and therapy, a la Freud, Meninger, 
Jung, etc., without curing a single, true schizophrenic. 

While true, organic insanity—psychosis, which totally 
obstructs rationality—has little to do with epistemology, 
neurosis—which interferes with rationality, but does not totally 
obstruct it—is yet another thing which can be induced by an 
epistemology which encourages beliefs which interfere with 
rationality. The kind of epistemology pushed by the government's 
covert propagandists is the Platonist epistemology, which induces 
neurosis in many people, but worse than that, it is an essential part 
of the government's program of controlling the way many people 
think. 

If we consider the general public as inmates in a gigantic 
mental asylum, the government's thought-control program is worse 
than mere quack psychotherapy, because the "psychotherapy" is 
intended to induce, rather than to alleviate neurosis. In this case, the 
"doctor" is fraudulently generating more "business" through abuse 
of his patients, by inducing them to believe things which will 
maintain, create or increase neurotic "dependency". 

Since one's credulity, regulated by one's epistemology, limits 
what he or she finds believable, credulity is a sort of governor, which 
allows information and ideas into the mind, or excludes them, either 
as "credible" or "incredible", subject to certain tests which one 
requires of them. Ordinarily, for one with an Aristotelian 
epistemology, these 'tests' are in the form of rational questions, such 
as: 


1. Can the information be objectively verified by my senses or 
detected scientifically? 
2. Have I personally seen, heard, touched, smelled, measured 
or otherwise sensed it? 
3. Is the information or idea from a reliable source? 
4. Can the information be documented by rational people? 
5. Does the information seem to violate any natural law? 
6. Does the information seem to violate any scientific law? 
7. Can I trust those who say it is valid? 
All these credulity tests are subject to modification whenever 
a person has a Platonist epistemology, since Platonists don't believe 
in relying upon objective evidence, and don't believe we can 'know' 
reality, a belief which is supposed to give them a "King's X" 
(immunity) from reality or accountability. Therefore, in order to 
render the public at large more easily susceptible to government 
thought control, the Platonist epistemology is naturally the one 
which the government trains its covert propaganda agents to 
promote, particularly through paranormalism and spiritualism. 

This technique came straight from Nazi Germany, and is what 
I call the Big Lie False Propaganda System, developed in 
conjunction with John D. Rockefeller's plan to control the world 
through religion, and taught to the SS by his psychologists and 
psychiatrists in the 1920s. In this system, a big hole is first wallowed 
in the public's credulity, with Big Paranormal Lies spread by people 
the public has been taught to respect—such as those with Ph.D.s 
and other authoritarian titles—so the public will accept whatever 
other Big Lies the government wants it to believe. As stated by Adolf 
Hitler: 


"In the size of the lie there is always contained a certain 
factor of credibility, since the great masses of people 
...will more easily fall victim to a great lie than to a 
small one, since they themselves...lie sometimes in little 
things...Thus such an idea of an untruth will not at all 
enter their heads...therefore, just for this reason some part 
of the most impudent lie will remain and stick." 

This statement revealed the mass-psychology system which was 
used on the German people to gain their support for events which 
defied the scientific reasoning for which Germans were known 
worldwide. 

Government thought-control won't work if there are plenty of 
reliable, respectable, rational, genuinely independent people 
available in society, with access to the media, to identify and point 
out the devious government-corporate scheming to the public. For 
that reason, to avoid this contingency, corporate-controlled media 
excludes such people, while the government's "official" public 
propaganda is directed partly to the general public, and partly to 
society's so-called "intelligentsia". 

Government Thought-Control of Scientists and Professionals 

This is a two-pronged, "divide-and-conquer" strategy carried 
out through two teams of covert propaganda agents, which I call the 
"Pseudo-Skeptics" and the "Pseudo-Paranormalists". The Pseudo- 
Skeptics pose as members and leaders of the intelligentsia, while the 
Pseudo-Paranormalists pose as members and leaders of the public's 
grass-roots "alternative" community. The message of the Pseudo- 
Skeptics also coincides with the government's "official, public" 
position on science, while the message of the Pseudo'Paranormalists 
is intended to represent irrationality, mixed with things like the 
worst kind of religious superstition and paranoia—to make the 
government's position seem more rational by comparison—and 
things the government wishes to discourage though ridicule heaped 


upon them by the Dupe-Intelligentsia (unwitting or useful educated 
idiots). 

A true intelligentsia, which would normally be guardians of the 
public regarding certain devious and dangerous government 
tendencies, is displaced, skillfully neutralized, isolated and 
misdirected toward red herrings, which the Pseudo-Skeptic leaders 
have duped the intelligentsia with, in order to misdirect them against 
the red herrings created by the Pseudo-Paranormalists, designed to 
neutralize the grass-roots movement. In this way the Big Lie System 
achieves the aims of the Dictatorship without bloodshed or overt 
oppression. It uses "trick psychology" on the people to carry out 
political, social and economic programs as part of its undisclosed 
agenda of control and economic and physical exploitation. 

Neither the Pseudo-Skeptics nor the Pseudo-Paranormalists are 
genuine representatives of true public opinion, but represent a 
"government-designed" set of opinions intended to intermesh, to 
subvert public opinion and rule by consent of the governed, from top 
to bottom and side to side, and to obliterate the most rational 
assumptions in the "arena of reason". What results is a "rule by 
consensus", a form of fascism.5 

In order to insure that "forbidden" knowledge remains secret, 
the system of government thought-control manufactures a false 
government "skepticism" among duped scientists and intellectuals, 
to maintain this secrecy regarding free-energy and Tesla's 
electro dynamic space propulsion technology, as I have already 
mentioned. This subject is not allowed to come up for discussion in 
officially sanctioned scientific gatherings. 

Certain free-energy or highly efficient scientific information is 
"classified" as "national secrets" by the government, so that, 
concerning certain scientific phenomena, laws, and procedures, the 
public is 'dumbed down', and denied this 'occult' knowledge 
possessed by the government and corporations exclusively. 
Corporate disclosures are kept in check by the national 

5Ayn Rand, Rule by Consensus, The New Fascism (1968). 

71 


security/non-disclosure agreements entered into under government 
contracts. Occult Ether Physics deals with this 'occult' knowledge as 
it applies to Tesla's discovery of electrodynamic UFO propulsion, in 
the late 19th century, 

I distinguish between "mind-control" and "thought-control" as 
follows: Mind control is involuntary, and does not require the 
conscious submission of the person whose mind is being controlled, 
while thought-control does. Thought-control is a kind of "thought 
fraud", a means of controlling one's opinions and beliefs through a 
combination of truth-concealment and false propaganda 
(information control), and intimidation (a kind of psychological 
terrorism). These are used to create the false appearance of 
"conscious" acceptance by the victim of a certain set of opinions 
regarding certain subject matter, as if the victim had consciously 
accepted those views, when in fact he has been defrauded by denial 
of information which has been replaced by misinformation, making 
it impossible for him to make a fully-informed decision. 

As an example of this thought-control among supposedly 
"rational" people today, whom I call "Dupe-Skeptics", there is a 
specific topic of conversation, about which independent, individual 
opinions are abolished, and only a certain, pre-ordained opinion is 
tolerated or considered to be "rational" by the government, as 
expressed by its official Pseudo-Skeptics, who must know the truth 
in order to conceal it, or pretend not to believe it. The government 
has the official policy of prohibiting any professional people who are 
respected for their positions in the community, from expressing 
opinions contrary to the government's dictum on this issue (just as 
it does on several other particular issues). 

On this particular topic, who or what power is it which "pre- 
ordains" or "allows" only the "tolerated" opinions, and "why"? 
What kind of intimidation inhibits supposedly rational, 
professionally educated people, creating their fear of the free 
discussion of a certain topic, inducing them to 'consciously' yield to 
the preferred opinion of the controlling authority, and to limit their 
own expressions—and even freedom of thought? Is their behavior 


only the 'rational' response to a fear of a power so strong and 
threatening, that the Dupe-Skeptics do not even permit their own 
minds to think otherwise? This system of inducing people to limit 
and control their own thoughts and expressions to conform to 
government parameters was copied from religion, and shows 
successful thought-control. It, like religion, employs guilt-based 
thought-control methods. 

The segment of our society from which educated Dupe- 
Skeptics usually come is generally one which is more easily 
intimidated than that of say, auto mechanics or heavy equipment 
operators, who are usually more resistant to such pressures. In fact, 
they may slap you up-side of the head with a tire-iron, if you try that 
on them. Dupe-Skeptics, under government persuasion, in deference 
to an external, covert government-connected controlling power and 
media-created consensus, have banned this opinion from rational 
consideration, and have categorically relegated it to the realm of the 
lunatic fringe, even though the forbidden opinion is the most rational 
alternative under the circumstances. 

Such a situation makes a mockery of the very concept of 
rational skepticism. What we are presented with as "skeptical 
opinion", in those magazines on the book stands—such as The 
Skeptic, The Skeptical Inquirer, or Skeptical Opinion—is more like 
covert government propaganda than anything remotely resembling 
true skepticism in the historical tradition, when it comes to the so- 
called "forbidden topic" of UFOs. 

Why would true skeptics be afraid of a truly rational 
consideration of the facts, reject the most rational alternative, and 
cave in to pressure from the government, the cult of intelligence, or 
some other group, regarding any topic? They wouldn't. What the 
government's reign of thought-terror has done, is reduce the ranks 
of true skeptics to a small few, who have little or nothing to do with 
groups or their magazines. I can be confident that these magazines 
will not respond directly to my accusations, in obedience to a covert 
policy to never mention or cite anyone who is not a part of the 
"official" two-pronged thought-control loop. This avoidance is 


another badge of their conscious fraud. 

It is irrefutable that many alleged "intellectuals" in our society 
have allowed the irrational "regulation" of their thought on this 
topic, by the government, by intelligence agencies, and by groups 
sponsored by them. Most of them lack the courage to say what they 
really believe, and many fear for their professional reputations and 
licenses. Yet, these same Dupe-Skeptics, who pride themselves on 
being rational, have virtually fled in fear from this topic, except to 
parrot the sole "allowed" opinion dictated by the government and its 
official opinion-makers. 

There is no question but that the Dupe-Skeptics have allowed 
their fear of the government to control their opinions, thoughts, and 
expressions on this topic. For example, of the many Unitarians I 
questioned on this topic (Unitarians pride themselves on having 
"independent opinions" and "free thought"), every single one of 
them, without exception, considered Philip Klass to be a wonderful 
speaker, who reflected their opinions regarding the non-existence of 
UFOs. Not a single one of them was bothered by the fact that Klass 
is a CIA man with a job to do on their minds. 

Such a situation seems preposterous or incredible, even to self- 
proclaimed "rational" thinkers, who would be very reluctant to 
admit its truth. For those who, of all people, seem to have tried so 
conscientiously and so hard and for so long, to be intellectually 
courageous, logical, truthful, frank, independent, and free in the 
range of their minds, it is truly astounding to realize that, on this 
topic, they have almost all allowed their opinions to be ultimately 
regulated and molded by the government. Yet the actual history of 
Unitarianism was not always of this cowardly "tradition". 

Some might comment that this conflict could only be possible 
in a totalitarian state. What we presently have appears to be a 
"covert" totalitarian state...one in which the dictat is so deceptive 
that the average citizen is completely unaware of it, and those of us 
who are aware of it are called "paranoid". The degree of this 
thought-control is greater than that exercised in terms of the 
prohibition of freedom of expression in the former Soviet Union. 


Could it be that the so-called "skeptical", "rational", "free-
thinker", "secular Humanist", Unitarians and other colleagues in 
our society—swayed by the statements of government employees, 
books, newspapers, and magazines (with so many CIA dupes on 
their boards and staffs), and other media products which inflict 
social and government pressures—have allowed their opinions to be 
determined by the government? How could those who in the past 
have so bravely taken controversial, rational positions on such topics 
as racial equality, abortion, sexual freedom, taxation, church-state 
separation, Atheism, cosmology, evolution, free thought, the draft, 
individualism and sovereignty, privacy, drugs, and the limits of 
legitimate government, be afraid to discuss any topic? 

The importance of the topic I speak about can be gauged by the 
degree to which, in comparison to the topics I just listed, the 
government places the utmost emphasis on maintaining secrecy, far 
beyond its efforts on any other topic, even nuclear weapon and 
missile secrets. 

This fear, silence, and sycophantic compliance proves that 
there is an unspoken, covert government rule, which prohibits a 
truly rational and free discussion on this topic, which is subject to 
the greatest priority, much like scientists were once persecuted by 
the church-state, which openly prohibited as heresy the free 
discussion of even the possibility that the scientific facts about the 
universe differed from those specified in holy writ. 

Anyone who questioned "god" (i.e., the state) did so at their 
own peril. The purpose today of this covert rule, which prohibits the 
opinion that UFOs are exclusively man-made electrodynes, and that 
the government has created false "alien contact" stories about them 
to hide them, is analogous to questioning the medieval "god", and 
carries the same stigma of a "heresy" in science, to officially enforce 
the ignorance of an abusive authority from challenge or erosion, in 
addition to protecting powerful economic interests from the threat 
of competition from a new technology which will eventually end 
their illicit power over the minds of scientists, and over the 
intellectual, economic, social, and physical freedom of our people. 

75



CHAPTER V - ALIEN VISITORS: 
Thought-Control on the Grass-Roots Level 

I first began studying flying saucers—then called "flying 
discs"—in the summer of 1946, seen by several people I knew, 
mostly oil field workers who ran oil well pumps in remote locations 
throughout West Texas and southern New Mexico. Many people at 
that time were seeing the ships in the area, and most of them 
correctly assumed that they were captured secret German aircraft 
brought to New Mexico and Ft. Bliss, Texas, after the war, from 
Germany. Wernher von Braun and some of his rocket and 
electrodyne group from Peenemunde were assigned to Ft. Bliss, to 
the north of El Paso, and a larger number of the Peenemunde 
scientists were at several other New Mexico locations such as White 
Sands Missile Range, Holloman AFB at Alamogordo, Sandia Base, 
Los Alamos, Kirtland AFB, etc. Most people in the area were aware 
of these activities at that time. 

These assignments were determined by the specialities of the 
scientists, the available facilities at the time at various nearby 
locations, and the particular roles assigned to the bases. Generally 
speaking, Sandia Base is an Army weapons development center. Ft. 
Bliss was the U.S. Army Ordinance center, before being moved to 
Redstone Arsenal in 1951. Holloman Air Force Base was an 
advanced fighter interceptor base, which also performed early U.S. 
advanced flight tests for UFOs. It also engaged in R. & D. on 
advanced flight problems, such as the rocket sled acceleration 
experiments, using rhesus monkeys, then chimps. For that reason, 
it became the location for the Southwest Primate Research center, 
which Jane Goodall seemed to become aware of after my book was 
published, detailing the cruel and painful deaths of the monkeys on 
the rocket sled. These tests were preparatory for such advanced 
human flights as that of the X-15, and in preparation for flights to 
the moon and other outer space missions, using rockets, pursuant 
to Wernher von Braun's dreams. 

Los Alamos National Laboratory, run by the University of 


California, Berkeley, was considered a scientific base, which dealt 
with the more precise studies and problems encountered with the 
UFO technology as it developed, such as how to deal with corrosion 
of the outer metal surfaces caused by the high voltage electrical 
discharges, which formed nitrogen oxide, which in combination with 
atmospheric moisture, formed nitric acid. This necessitated special 
acid-resistant surfaces. The lab also did special studies on such 
things as "spheronics" (the electronic resonant possibilities of 
spherical UFO shapes), the phenomenon of the lack of sonic boom 
or other sounds, the ability of the ships to accelerate to such 
fantastic speeds so rapidly, without producing a shock wave or 
experiencing friction heating of the surface by atmospheric gases, 
and several other mysteries or problems. It also did metallurgical 
work on special alloys for use on the ships, structural studies, and so 
forth. 

At Kirtland AFB, special studies were undertaken regarding the 
physiological aspects of UFO flight, and how the human being 
reacted to it. Sandia Base in the meanwhile explored the possibilities 
of appropriate weaponry for use on UFOs, while White Sands 
Missile Range, as an "impact range", was used for the testing of 
these weapons. 

Many people in the region were veterans of the European war, 
and some had seen the "foo fighters" over Germany. Several of my 
friends were the children of Air Force veterans, some of whom were 
air aces, such as the father of my friend, Carter McKenzie. There 
were several ace fighter pilots in my model airplane club. Other 
friends were the children of scientists and technicians who worked 
in the Manhattan Project during WW II. 

Some of the men who taught our model airplane club how to 
build and fly good planes were ace fighter pilots. I point this out to 
show that many who assumed that the flying discs were "secret 
German aircraft" were expert aviators, who had witnessed first-hand 
German aviation technology over the skies of Europe in the most 
intimate way. This assumption was a problem that the government 
soon set out to change. 


I had seen the discs in 1946 in the night sky as squadrons of 
lights at high altitude, which turned in increments of 30 degrees. I 
also saw what appeared to be discs at a distance on several 
occasions, but did not see one close-up in broad daylight until late 
summer, 1953, not more than a few days before the start of school. 

In July, 1947, the Roswell Hoax was cooked up by military 
intelligence personnel at Holloman AFB, New Mexico, some of 
whom were ex members of Reinhard Gehlen's special Nazi Gestapo 
outfit, the Reichsicherheithauptamt VI ("National Security Agency 
Division 6"), which had been in charge of security and 
counterintelligence (disinformation) for the Nazi saucer project 
called "KT-p2", for the Third Reich. The hoax was perpetrated near 
Roswell, to give the Holloman spooks "plausible deniability", to 
prevent the Roswell personnel from knowing about the hoax, and to 
convince the regional public that the ships it was seeing were of 
extraterrestrial origin, and unknown to the government. The hoax 
was intended to be confined to the area covered by Army Air Force 
Intelligence "P.I.O" ("Public Information Officer") Walter Haut's 
press releases, which were only sent to newspapers and other media 
in that region. 

Since the 1947 Roswell Hoax, I had observed the growth of 
this false propaganda program for 46 years, until I published my 
1993 book, Space Aliens From the Pentagon. The propaganda putsch 
had always kept up the pressure to induce a belief in "aliens" and 
"extraterrestrial UFOs", as a means of concealing the discs' man- 
made origin, and to conceal the government's involvement in 
experimentation and flight training in that part of the country. 

Today, 55 years later, it seems ludicrous to hear people say 
there is a "cover-up of alien contact" by the government, when it 
has been the government which has been pushing the "alien 
contact" scenario for the past 55 years. Why would the government 
want to cover up what it has been covertly inducing the public to 
believe for so long, especially since so many of the suckers have 
believed it? The relative percentage of people who believed the lies 
in 1947 was much smaller, because that generation did not have its 


heads in the clouds, and had its feet planted on solid earth. 

That earlier generation was more familiar with the realities of 
German science, was generally aware of what the government was 
doing "right next door", and was more realistic and harder for the 
government to fool. Today's generation is not so stolid, and is much 
more gullible, so the percentages have been steadily rising, as the 
government's thought-control dictatorship has gradually become 
more complete. TV, which didn't even exist in the Southwest in 
1947, barely existed in the larger cities like Albuquerque, by 1953. 
The existence of this mass-media, together with the government's 
thorough development of inroads into the movie and TV industries, 
have brought the thought-control system into every home on a daily 
basis. 

During the 46 years prior to my book, I didn't bother to read 
all the false propaganda, only enough to confirm its falsity. I had an 
aunt who was all caught up in the paranormal and 'alien' hype, so I 
could always read any of the propaganda she had, such as a whole 
stack of Fate magazines and several other pulps whenever 1 had a 
mind to. I kind of took a "grab-sample" every now and then, to 
check the progress of the propaganda, just to make certain that 
nothing new had popped up, but it didn't. 

Everything which I have seen since 1947 was an extension of 
the original Roswell Hoax. In my writings, I sometimes refer to 
certain books, etc., only to illustrate certain points, but I have never 
based my research on what others have said. When it comes to other 
writers, I am only interested in facts they may have documented, but 
possibly overlooked, or which are usually misinterpreted, and 
sometimes misstated for obvious purposes. Whenever I find an 
intentional lie by one of these authors, by comparing the facts to 
what they have stated, to the statements of more reputable sources, 
or to information which I have developed, I know that there is a 
motive behind the lie, so I look more deeply into it to see why. 

Today, after having seen so much of the propaganda, I know 
that I can depend on the government writers to continue to practice 
the same false reasoning used all along since 1947, guided by 


government security parameters. This is perfectly logical, 
maintaining substantially the same original format and propaganda 
tricks used in the Roswell hoax. The government has apparently 
decided to make "Roswell" a perennial thing, to be played upon by 
their covert propaganda teams and front writers, since so much of 
their later false propaganda depends upon that original hoax. 

In 1960 I worked alongside Jesse Marcel for two weeks—the 
same "Major" Jesse Marcel—who inadvertently became a main 
character in the original Roswell Hoax. The reason I believe that 
Marcel was not a "witting" participant in the hoax, is because, from 
my experiences with Marcel, I believe he was an honest man who 
really wasn't the kind to fool the public intentionally, and wouldn't 
have been very successful at it anyway. It's possible that they 
subsequently forced him to remain silent—which was required by 
his clearance anyway—to conceal certain facts, but his clearance 
didn't require him to remain silent on things learned through 
"innocent means", from non-government sources. I only know what 
Marcel told me. Marcel was a fine man, intelligent, dignified, and it 
was a pleasure to talk and work with him. 

Marcel was a company representative for Mary Carter Paint 
Company, out of New Orleans, and I managed a Mary Carter store 
in Midland, Texas. His job was to come and work with me for two 
weeks, to see what I had accomplished with the paint mixing and 
matching system which I was employed to help the company 
develop. I was an expert in that area, because I had learned to use 
the Munsell Color System while a student at the Columbus College 
of Art and Design in Columbus, Ohio in 1957-60. I also had several 
years experience in our family paint and decorating business 
between the ages of eight and fifteen, in Kermit, Texas, between 
1947 and 1952. At that time we had the most modern paint and 
interior decorating company between Phoenix, Dallas and 
Albuquerque. We had clients from as far away as Silver City and 
Albuquerque New Mexico, and Abilene and El Paso Texas. 

It was because of my experience in the paint business, and 
expertise in mixing and matching colors, that I was hired to work in 


the paint store, to teach the owner of the store and to develop a 
coherent set of mixing and matching formulas, to be utilized by the 
rather new paint corporation in its many stores. 

Years before, just before the Roswell Hoax, some military 
people from the Alamogordo-White Sands area had come down to 
Kermit, wanting to know about green paint, and how to apply it just 
to create a "greenish tint". I showed them how to rub dry, powdered 
green tempera paint on a surface to create a green tint, and sold 
them some of our green "Prang" dry tempera pigment. Soon 
afterward, when the word got out in the Roswell Hoax—possibly by 
rumor or by news story—that "little green aliens" were found in the 
"crashed alien space ship", I immediately suspected that the 
technique which I had shown those men had been used in the hoax 
to create the "little green aliens". At that point, without photos, I 
figured they could have used midgets or dummies, possibly monkeys, 
dressed up in space suits. Regular paint wouldn't have been as 
convincing, since it was not flexible enough. 

I was not aware that I was working with the same Jesse Marcel 
who had unwittingly played a part in the Roswell Hoax of 1947. The 
reason I was unaware of that, was because I hadn't paid that much 
attention to something I knew to be a hoax. The reason I say Marcel 
"unwittingly" played a part, is because I think Marcel was pulled 
into the hoax unawares. 

In our discussions while working, in between customers, and 
during meals at Midland restaurants, Marcel told me about his Air 
Force training as a bomber pilot, at the Midland Air Park during 
WW II, as part of a "second team" of the 509th Bomb Group, being 
trained to drop A-bombs. He said they took the big bombers through 
Immelmann turns, in order to drop the bombs more safely, since in 
ordinary bombing, the bomb would detonate along a line directly 
beneath the plane, exposing the plane and crew to blast radiation 
and shock waves. 

The Immelmann turn avoided this, by having the plane going 
in the opposite direction from the bomb. A bomber would be taken 
in a half'loop, releasing the bomb at the quarter-loop point, which 


threw the bomb outward due to the centrifugal force and 
momentum. The bomb continued upward, away from the plane, 
until it reached its apex, then continued to arch over into vertical 
descent, sort of like tossing a softball underhanded in a high arch. 
Meanwhile, while the bomb arched toward its apex, the plane was 
arching back in the opposite direction to its apex, in inverted flight, 
at the 'half-loop' position. This gave the plane some time to distance 
itself from the descending bomb, as it proceeded to its final 
destination. The plane was then rolled over carefully to place it into 
regular flight in the opposite direction to that from which it had 
arrived. The bomb meanwhile continued on downward, and by the 
time it reached its detonation altitude of about 10,000 feet (the 
bombs were air-bursts), the plane was far enough from the blast to 
withstand it, and to protect the crew from its radiation. 

The subject of Roswell—and the hoax—arose in our 
conversations, because that was where Marcel said he was stationed 
after the war, so that brought up the subject. After I told Marcel 
what my sister's mother-in-law had told me about her sister—the 
Army Air Corps nurse at Roswell, who later became a nun—who 
was present during the so-called "autopsy" (actually a dissection, 
performed on a rhesus monkey), he confided in me that he agreed 
that the whole thing was a hoax, designed to cover up the German 
UFOs which the both of us knew were being flown by the 
government and military in the region after the war. I had told 
Marcel about my post-war high-altitude sightings of squadrons, and 
the close-up 1953 sighting over our back yard. 

Being an aircraft nut myself, and formerly in Air Force 
Intelligence like Marcel, we had some interesting conversations. 
Marcel was a very nice guy, originally of Cajun descent from 
Louisiana, just as my uncle was. He had the same tight wavy hair 
that my uncle's Louisiana relatives had, which can be seen on the 
ancient sculptures of Akkadians of Mesopotamia, c. 2300 BCE. 
This is because the Cajuns descended from the ancient Akkadians. 
After I left the Mary Carter Paint Company, in the summer of 
1960,1 was the artist-in-residence of the Midland Art Association, 


and lived in the old Air Force buildings at the Midland Air Park, 
where I also did some painting and drawing, and taught classes for 
the Art Association. The floors were still decorated with the original 
blue and yellow tile, which showed the insignia of the Air Force 
bomb group, and most of the inner structure of the old air base was 
still intact. It was eerie to imagine what had transpired there in the 
closing days of WW II, only 15 years before. 

Jesse Marcel was not a deceptive person, who would have been 
skillful at creating or carrying out a hoax. Originally trained as a 
bomber pilot in the atomic bomb program, his later training as an 
intelligence officer was oriented toward maintaining the usual 
nuclear bomb and Air Force delivery systems secrets at Roswell. He 
seemed to have no awareness of, capacity for or training in the 
intricacies of false propaganda or spooky activities. After all, he was 
a pilot. 

It was not until the summer of 1993 that I published my first 
UFO book, Space Aliens From the Pentagon, 244 pages, 8" x 11". 
There was practically no activity in the UFO field at that time, but 
my book—100 hand-bound copies—hadbarely seen the light of day, 
when the OSI began an accelerated and massive counterintelligence 
campaign. The volume of new material buried my little book. 

The shelves at the bookstores, which had previously displayed 
only a handful of UFO/alien books, were soon filled to capacity, 
crowding my books off the shelves and making them as invisible as 
a needle in a haystack. It was difficult enough to distribute them, 
because the CIA keeps such a tight handle on what the large 
distributors catalogue in that field. It exerts considerable leverage on 
large publishers and book dealers, since the government buys so 
many books for the thousands of libraries and bookstores at military 
bases and other domestic and overseas installations of the U.S. 
government. 

In 1996 I published a revised and expanded, 252-page second 
edition, with small-type, and in 1999 published a final, small-type, 
306-page third edition, re-named Pentagon Aliens, in 8" x 10" 
format. In 1997 I had published Occult Ether Physics: Tesla's Hidden 


Space Propulsion System and the Conspiracy to Conceal It, followed 
in 1998 with a second revised edition. Each of these books is densely 
packed with material, since, as a self-publisher, I had to compress 
my material to get more 'bang for the buck'. 

Since 1993, almost every single UFO/alien publication I have 
read has contained propaganda and arguments directed specifically 
against issues I raised for the first time in my books, without 
mentioning who had raised the issues they sought to counteract. 
Since I was the one raising those issues, it was clear to me that they 
were responses to my books. No more than a couple of these writers 
even mentioned my name or the names of my books. 

I have also heard direct quotes on prime-time TV from others 
who apparently read my books, such as Robin Williams, who 
repeated my joke concerning a "...flea farting in a tornado", from 
Space Aliens From the Pentagon, verbatim, on the David Letterman 
Show, around 1999. I was flattered that he did so. 

Many of my ideas have been perverted and used in several 
movies and TV shows, such as The X-Files, One of the first 
influences I noticed was in the movie Terminal Velocity, starring 
Charlie Sheen, There was a "Sam's Surplus City" in the movie, 
where the owner had a rocket sled. This was a combination of my 
cartoon, "Sam's Saucer City", "King's Surplus City" in Albuquerque 
(where I purchased my Peiltochterkompass), and the rocket sled I 
mentioned at Holloman, to which the rhesus monkeys in G-suits 
were strapped. The "terminal velocity" was the 120 mph velocity 
which 1 alluded to as the velocity of "weightlessness". 

Since 1993, never have so many government propagandists 
argued so much or so vigorously to counteract the words of a writer 
who almost none of them ever mentioned, but were apparently 
aware of and were responding to. This follows the policy which I 
have identified, that the government propagandists are never to 
mention another writer on the subject, unless he is a CIA asset, 
because they want results to be predictable and controlled by them, 
and don't want to draw attention to "non-assets". 

The alien putsch was multiplied and magnified several times 


over in the past eight years, but with very little new added to what 
had already been said, except for the arguments designed to 
specifically counteract my books, arguments and evidence. My 
books have been the source of not only much plagiarized material 
for the counterintelligence Ph.D. parasites—who, as I said in my 
first edition, lacked originality or creativity—but also a source of 
dozens of new themes which I introduced, which have been 
appropriated and reworked as false propaganda in the alien putsch, 
in films, books and articles, without attribution, by generally 
uncreative writers. This devious form of plagiarism is a lowly 
sponging of ideas. 

The reason so many of these government propagandists have 
gotten their ideas from my books is because they were required to 
read them, because they lack creativity, and because many of my 
ideas are appropriate for complete books, so many can be or have 
been written on my ideas. 

I could have written many more books myself on each of my 
themes, but could only afford to publish one book at a time. As I 
slowly began to chisel away at the monolithic publicity and book 
distribution field so well-guarded by the CIA, to get my books 
distributed, I usually had to go through underground channels. 

Meanwhile, the CIA's unlimited resources allowed it to finance 
many writers and the publishing of many books, often derived from 
my themes, to counteract what I was saying, as if to teach me an 
"object lesson". 

In one case—the movie Roswell—a character in the movie 
appears to impersonate me, making my "monkey aliens" argument 
to Martin Sheen and others. The name given to the character was 
similar to mine, and the whole portrayal was as uncomplimentary as 
possible, as if a childish retort to me without mention. This was the 
result of my psychological warfare working on their minds. 

In 1995 I wrote an article, No Aliens, Just Assholes, for 
Paranoia magazine. Soon after, in the movie Independence Day, as 
the character played by William Smith flies a nuclear-armed jet 
fighter into a hole in the center of the giant alien ship over 


Washington, D.C., to give it the death blow, he screams, "Take this, 
you alien assholes!" Again, the idea is taken and completely 
perverted. 

One of the few writers to mention me, Phil Patton, hardly got 
anything right about me personally, either because he is a sloppy 
researcher, or by intent. He said he got a copy of my second edition 
in North Carolina. In his book Dreamland, apparently influenced 
throughout by my book—particularly in his "movie reviews" and in 
imitation of my comparisons between Pentagon and professional 
Hollywood special effects—he got very little right about my book. 
But by copying my technique of comparing Pentagon and 
Hollywood special effects, Patton inadvertently supported my 1993 
thesis that the government USES such special effects in its alien 
hoaxes. In his chapter 21, "Space Aliens from (sic) the Pentagon and 
Other Conspiracies", he made the following misrepresentations: 

1. That I said the saucers were "faked by the Pentagon" (I said the 
aliens were faked by the Pentagon, but that the saucers are real, 
man-made electric flying machines); 
2. That I said the Pentagon's purpose in creating the saucers was to 
"frighten the public into the arms of the NWO" (I said the 
Pentagon's purpose in mystifying the saucers as "alien ships" was to 
conceal the technology from the public, and to wallow a hole in the 
public's credulity with paranormalism, so that it would accept 
whatever Big Lies the government wants us to believe); 
3. That I was alone when I saw Hitler in San Antonio in 1967 (I 
had a credible fellow witness, who recognized him simultaneously); 
4. That I "..argued with R. Sargent Shriver over my dismissal from 
the Peace Corps" (a lie; I had a friendly talk with Shriver, which was 
BEFORE I was dismissed from Peace Corps training); 
5. That I received an MFA from Sam Houston State U. (my MFA 

was from U.T., Austin, just as it states on my book jacket); 

6. That I said the National Security Act of 1947 was treasonous 
because it "...divided the services". (Another lie: I said it was 
treasonous because it was never passed into law, was a presidential 
edict, and that it violated American sovereignty and liberty by 
denying our right to fully-informed consent or refusal.); 
7. That I had "seen photos of dead monkeys", but "they were stolen 
by a former girlfriend" (another lie: I possessed a photo of dead 
rhesus monkeys in G-suits, and a photo of a fake 'saucer' used in the 
Roswell Hoax, until the photos were stolen by a woman I didn't 
even know until later. 
Patton's other statements about me and my book, taken out of 
context in most cases, though somewhat accurate, demonstrated an 
obvious intent to ridicule me, the man he got ideas from and 
plagiarized, a tendency I have noticed among several others of his 
ilk. As often said, however, "Imitation is the sincerest form of 
flattery." 

Patton's overall approach to his book also appeared to be 
strongly influenced by my 1997 Internet piece, A Truth Seeker Goes 
to Roswell, which is repeated in this work for you. 

At least Patton mentioned me. My influence was also apparent 
in other ways. On page 41 he said (speaking of the "Federation of 
American Scientists' Mystery Aircraft Report"), "The study pointed 
out the 'epistemological' problems.,.", "too many sightings, too 
much information, too many possible planes—and yet not enough 
evidence." This was based on my chapter, "Einstein Was a New-
Ager", in which I explained how a person's epistemology—theory of 
knowledge, either Platonist or Aristotelian—influenced the way he 
either related, or failed to relate, to reality. Patton apparently didn't 
know what epistemology meant, since what he was referring to was 
not epistemology, but rather a "cognitive problem", the inability to 
think. 


The most damning thing about Patton and his book was his 
failure to mention my influence on his writing, and his attempt to 
trivialize and misrepresent my book and what I actually said and its 
impact, while at the same time imitating me. 

The number of sightings, amount of information and number 
of aircraft relates not to an "epistemological problem", since the 
theory of knowledge for a scientist should be assumed to be 
Aristotelian, based on the primacy of the senses as valid tools of 
cognition. A person with an "epistemological problem" shouldn't be 
a scientist. 

Aristotelian epistemology tells one who observes a flying 
saucer/UFO, that it is a real flying machine. Epistemology in this 
case relates to what is real, and whether or not the aircraft observed 
actually exists or not. About that, there should be no doubt in a 
scientist's mind, because so many of the people who have seen them 
are rational, experienced, professional, expert aircraft observers, yet 
the government set up Operation Blue Book at Wright-Patterson to 
intercept these sighting reports and classifiy them, to prevent public 
disclosure. 

If I saw a jet fighter and heard its engines from a distance, but 
its exact configuration was hazy, there is room for a difference of 
opinion as to whether it was an F-14 or an F-16, but not that it 
didn't exist at all, or wasn't an aircraft. That's the main reason that 
educated, supposedly rational people who don't believe UFOs exist 
at all are the fools, not the people who report them. 

When so many expert aircraft observers—both civilian and 
military—have observed and reported UFOs, and just as many 
microbiological experts have reported germs seen through a 
microscope, you are a fool to believe they don't exist, even though 
you may never have seen a UFO or a germ. On the other hand, you 
are a fool to believe that a UFO is an "alien" UFO, because there is 
no evidence, and an enormous improbability that it is alien. 

Since UFOs are apparently flying machines, and since there is 
absolutely no evidence in the world of even a single machine being 
made by any being other than man (not including some insect 


constructions and rocks used by chimps and other animals, etc), it 
is completely rational to believe that ALL UFOs are man-made. 

With the current dictatorship over what scientists are allowed 
to say, the national security tampering with the area of UFOs has 
created a vacuum of public scientific knowledge concerning areas of 
science which "don't make sense", yet which should be fully 
understood by the general student of science, especially when 
considering the advances of the past 100 years, which are being 
hidden from us today through government secrecy. Consequently, 
on the issue of gravity, the public is still stuck in the 17th century 
with Newton, and Newton's "corpuscular" theory of light is used as 
part of the cover-up of ether physics. 

This scientific vacuum is primarily what I address in Occult 
Ether Physics, as the scientific discoveries concerning the nature of 
gravity and electrodynamic propulsion made in the late 19th century 
by Nikola Tesla, as the crowning achievement of a whole series of 
experiments and studies toward that same end, conducted by the 
world's greatest scientists. This period of physics, oddly enough, had 
been utterly "ignored", until the time I documented Tesla's 
electrodynamic discoveries in 1997-98, from books which were 
available but hard to get. 

1 am still amazed that all the other writers and so-called 
"researchers" on the UFO question, since 1947, when the German 
ships first became evident, had absolutely failed to discover or write 
about the series of international scientific experiments and 
researches leading up to Tesla's successful testing and proving of his 
concept in 1894, until 1 published Occult Ether Physics. 

Tesla's 1894 tests were witnessed by Marguerite Merrington, 
a famous New York dancer, among other friends of Tesla's. 
Merrington was interviewed by the FBI in 19431 concerning her 
witnessing of this discovery, soon after Tesla's death in 1943, during 
a national security investigation of Tesla's "known associates", in 
order to determine "who knew what" about the obviously 

1 FBI Papers on Nikola Tesla, produced under the FOIA. 

89 


astounding Tesla secrets. The fact that the FBI apparently knew 
about the subject matter of Merrington's observation and its 
enormous importance to space propulsion, yet agreed with the 
government's "scientific experts", that 'none of Tesla's discoveries 
were worth classifying', suggests that there was a conspiracy between 
the FBI and the Nazi state. 

Other than to state that Merrington had witnessed "...metallic 
plate suspensions..." by Tesla (using high voltage, high frequency 
currents), the details of the FBI's complete interview of Merrington 
have not been disclosed, which brings us to the question, "Why not? 
What more could Merrington have confirmed with her 1894 
observation, that the FBI and US government don't want us to 
know, 106 years later?" But we know from books and publishings by 
or about Tesla from that time period, that each of those plates were 
solid zinc, 1/8" x 12" square, which if formed into a solid bar of 
metal, 1" square, would be 18" long, weighing several pounds. 

Having finally proved the principle for his "electric flying 
machine" with those plates, it was merely a matter of expanding the 
size of the plates large enough, and curving them to enclose a ship, 
having its own internal electrical generator (turned as Tesla said by 
one of his bladeless turbines), complete with pilot and controls. 

To compound the scientific ignorance of the establishment 
physicists, the area of free energy, which includes Tesla's electric 
flying machine, had not been documented or explained until my 
books. 

In light of these ancient facts, it is ludicrous to consider the 
argument that "the human race is incapable of building flying 
saucers which perform like that". Considering all the "alien hype" 
which the world has been subjected to since 1947, without a stitch 
of hard evidence of alien visitations to earth, The Roswell Hoax 
stands out as a monument to corporate-state deceit and public 
gullibility. 


CHAPTER VI - THE ROSWELL HOAX: 
A Truth Seeker Goes to Roswell


In late June, 1997, I was pleased to receive an invitation from 
Bonnie Lange of Truth Seeker to be their guest at the 50th 
anniversary festival of the "Roswell Incident"....which I call "The 
Roswell Hoax". It was an intriguing proposition...me with my 
"intolerable view"...provided with an opportunity to stand toe-to-toe 
(yet on unequal footing) with the UFOlogy-alien theory 
"biggies"...whom I call OSI/CIA BIG LIARS...right in the womb of 
their initial hoax. What could I do, what could I say? I accepted, of 
course. What better opportunity to document the thought-control 
dictatorship? 

My host had given me a hotel room at the Roswell Inn, with 
the provision that my room was also to serve as a video interview 
room by the Truth Seeker videographer, Ron Garner. I was anxious 
to meet Garner and the other people of the Truth Seeker 
contingent, especially Bonnie Lange, and was disappointed that she 
decided not to come. I was glad to be involved, since Truth Seeker 
literature stated a set of premises which were consistent with my 
own thinking. 

I knew that, since no intellectual match is ever perfect, there 
might be someone in the contingent who might not exactly see eye- 
to-eye with me or the Truth Seeker philosophy, but didn't expect 
total contradiction. There are always parasitical opportunists who 
will attach themselves to a group to hitch a free ride for their 
undisclosed agenda at a host's expense. That has certainly never 
been my approach, as I do not enjoy being with people who don't 
desire my company, but I knew of one group which does that as a 
matter of twisted principle, if you can call it that. 

I had my reservations about the probability for success of this 
involvement for Truth Seeker, in terms of what they hoped to 
accomplish, since the whole scenario, in order to be of value to 
them, would have to be investigative. I had the distinct experience 
of four years of attempting to penetrate the OSI/CIA barriers with 


what my Santa Fe friend, Fred, called my "attempt to spread sanity". 
I could see that, as an apparently non-Secret-Government-backed 
group, Truth Seeker might meet strong opposition...even 
sabotage...by "them". 

As the day approached for me to head out to Roswell, I 
contemplated the situation in relation to my position: While I have 
usually been able to step into a strange environment and spot the 
immediate inconsistencies, as a Disbeliever in the alien theory I am 
perceived by the hard core UFOlogy leaders as "the enemy". While 
the presence of "Alienists" among free thinkers is tolerated, 
Alienists do not usually extend the same degree of fairness to those 
with whom they disagree, much less to an archenemy like myself. 
From my viewpoint, a CIA-employed "skeptic" like Philip Klass is 
not in "my camp", because the conditions of his employment forbid 
him from admitting the existence of man-made electro dynamic 
flying saucers. I knew that, in fact, Klass is the primary protagonist 
of one side of a two-pronged strategy designed specifically to conceal 
this exclusively man-made technology. Klass never denied his CIA 
employment, and neither did the "fathers" of the "alien flying 
saucers" movement of the 1950s. Many fail to understand how this 
two-pronged strategy—employing the (pseudo) "Skeptics" and 
(pseudo) "Believers"—is used to lead the two packs of dupes and 
suckers, or that it was created by, and is controlled by the CIA, or 
to understand why I encounter equal opposition from both these 
government-orchestrated groups. 

The dupes of Klass have attempted to misrepresent me as a 
member of the "Believer" class, while those of the Believer class 
have attempted to misrepresent me as a member of the "Klass 
Class". I am the only major figure who does not, and will not, work 
for the government, so the leaders of both groups make sure I am 
excluded from debates, because, if you will recall, they will only 
mention, cite, or address the fantasies and people they create as 
"controlled assets". Klass is just as much a kook for denying the 
existence of flying saucers as the Believers are in their insistence on 
the presence of aliens. The house of Klass is made of glass. 


The so-called "skeptics" of CSICOP (Committee for the 
Scientific Investigation of Claims of the Paranormal, headed by Klass) 
are not true skeptics, but rather a clandestinely controlled false 
propaganda operation of the OSL Their operations within the 
continental U.S. are illegal under the U.S. constitution, but if you 
read the so-called "national security" laws, you'll see that Congress 
has betrayed 'We the People' by agreeing to the passage of legislation 
which permits this betrayal and allowing pretty much anything the 
"spooks" want to do. These laws are completely VOID, because 
Congress has absolutely NO JURISDICTION to pass any law which 
contravenes constitutional prohibitions against the violation of our 
INVIOLABLE (human, natural) BILL OF RIGHTS, so they are ail 
liable for prosecution by the PEOPLE for their TREASON. 

This treason is misrepresented as a "service" to us. Their 
alleged "job" is the protection of our "national security", under the 
cover of which their "covert" job is to protract the clandestine 
domination of us by the international coercive monopolists. Their 
procedure is as follows: Evaluation of conditions; collection of 
intelligence; analysis of information; formulation of subversive 
policy; and, lastly, dissemination of disinformation, in a program 
which, in respect to electro dynamic flying machines, is designed 
primarily to conceal the reality of and technology behind man-made 
flying saucers. The UFOlogists mainly disseminate false propaganda, 
and as far as I've ever seen, never disseminate the essential truth, 

A true "skeptic"—in the original historical sense, as elucidated 
by the parallel writings of Valmiki, of ancient India, and Socrates, 
of ancient Greece—should question everything. CSICOP supports 
the official government denial of the existence of man-made 
electrodynamic flying saucers, and is a covert creation of the 
government—involving the CIA, the Smithsonian Institution, the 
National Science Foundation, etc. The only things they are 
"skeptical" of are the assertions of the Alien Believers and the other 
paranormalists—spawned by the government's own 1947 Roswell 
press releases—all "designed" by the OSI's Ph.D. committees. This 
at best is pseudo-skepticism, at worst, a massive criminal fraud 


perpetrated by the government upon the people. 

True skeptics have never been the conscious catspaws of 
clandestine government controllers. "...In this corner we have the 
officially designated 'divergent thinkers'—Kevin Randall, Don 
Schmitt, Linda Moulton Howe, Whitley Strieber, etc.—and in this 
corner, we have the "skeptics"—led by the King's very own Philip 
Klass" ...... So what's wrong with this picture? Could we identify 
Valmiki or his creation, Prince Rama, in his epic novel, The 
Ramayana, with Klass, who is employed by the CIA? Never. Klass 
is only the Chamberlain. The Chamberlain's similar secret 
machinations were exposed by Valmiki's heroes. The Chamberlain 
was the guy who created phony crises, so he could pose as a hero 
when he "solved" them, a "Wag the Dog" scenario. 

In the thousands of years since, nothing seems to have 
changed. Today, the Chamberlain's agents masquerade as self-styled 
"skeptics" or "paranormalists" who believe in "aliens", ghosts, and 
psychic phenomena, and pervert the "truth-seekers". Having read 
Valmiki's Indian classic, the CIA's "Chamberlains" have learned 
some new tricks. These things were in my mind when I was invited 
to Roswell, and I naively thought that, since Truth Seeker magazine 
sponsored me, the intent was to expose them. 

On the sweltering afternoon of July 2, 1997, I loaded up my 28- 
year-old Chevy pickup and headed out for Roswell. I pulled into the 
Roswell Inn some time after 5:00 P.M., parked, and entered the 
lobby to check in. 

The hotel was as busy as a beehive. Amidst a small crowd near 
the desk, I spotted Jim, a man I mention in my book as "the M.I.B." 
who trained "The Two" —Marshall Herff Applewhite and Bonnie 
Sue Nettles—in late 1972, early 1973—in a house in Santa Fe that 
the threesome shared for about three months. A tall man with dark 
hair, whom I didn't recognize, stood by Jim, who was wearing a 
freaky western hat which had what appeared to be a greenish, 
flowery-patterned chiffon scarf draped around the crown. 

My presence shocked Jim, while his attire shocked me. I am one 
of a very few people who could establish Jim's earliest involvement 


with the formation of the Heaven's Gate "suicide cult", discussed 
in my original 1993 first edition of Space Aliens From the Pentagon, 
—four years before the 1997 mass deaths, and on pages 118-19 of 
my 1995 second edition—which some later took as a sign of 
clairvoyance. I also knew that Jim had a law degree from the 
University of Denver, was a "retired" colonel, who had been in Air 
Force Intelligence, like myself, except he was in the Air Force O.S.L 
("Office of Special Investigations"—not to be confused with the 
related spook outfit, "Office of Scientific Intelligence", or the 
Nuremberg Tribunal's "Office of Special Investigations"). Since Jim 
immediately attempted to hide his face, we didn't speak. The tall, 
dark-headed man left the area, and I passed Jim and approached the 
desk, signed in, and went to my room to unpack and settle in. 

Though several of my Santa Fe friends and I had known Jim 
for some time, none of us was permitted into the house during the 
mysterious training, or were told the nature of the training Jim was 
giving "The Two". We initially thought it was some sort of kinky 
sex thing. I had briefly encountered the threesome while they were 
out for coffee, and had momentarily entered the house with a friend 
only once during the training period, when only Jim was present. 
Ever since the CIA-designed 1997 Heaven's Gate Mass Suicide 
Incident, which Jim knew I knew he was inextricably connected 
with, he has pretended to "disappear", as reported by the Santa Fe 
and Albuquerque papers. 

Having known Jim for over 25 years in 1997, I was well- 
versed on his various beliefs, including the Gurdjieff/Synergist 
teachings. That group had targeted me on several occasions, 
especially since I had exposed their undisclosed agenda, twisted 
philosophy, and unethical tactics. Add to this their CIA/OSI 
connections and misinformation agenda. 

It was not until 1975 or so that I became aware, primarily 
through news articles, that Jim had trained The Two as tools of the 
OSl/CIA's phony "alien" scenario. One of their main jobs was to 
show up at the sites of "cattle mutilations" (medical experiments) 
to create the false impression that the experiments were the result 


of an occult group created by Jim called "O.S.I.R.I.S." ("Outer 
Space International Research and Investigations Society"). That 
bizarre conclusion was borne out by the fact that Jim had written a 
couple of news articles in 1975 about how a friend of his had joined 
the cult, while he was careful to conceal the fact that he had 
intensively trained the leaders of the cult for three months in Santa 
Fe in 1972, on contract for the CIA, followed by their immediate 
commencement of the cult activity he had designed and trained 
them to lead. 

When the nature of the false propaganda activities of the "cult" 
became obvious to me from articles in the papers, the kind of 
counterintelligence "training" given to them by Jim in 1972 became 
clear, and was 100% consistent with what I already knew about him, 
as well as the government's secret programs which was confirmed by 
these facts. 

When I first met Jim, I was living in my geodesic dome to the 
south of Santa Fe, while struggling to make a living and completing 
construction of my geodesic dome house, which until 1974 had no 
running water, electricity, or phone. There were not many 
alternative social pathways in Santa Fe at the time, so Jim's and my 
paths crossed constantly. Many of the women I dated were dated by 
Jim, which, as was later confirmed, was his way of using some of 
them as unwitting spies to gather information on me. Since my 1975 
rejection of George Bush's offer to become a high-paid intellectual 
whore for the CIA, Jim had apparently been entrusted to continue 
the recruitment of me through other means. 

In 1977, on learning that I had been studying petroglyphs with 
the intention of writing a book, Jim came to my house, and to my 
utter astonishment, actually attempted to hire me to write books on 
behalf of the government saying the petroglyphs were the writings 
of ancient extraterrestrials. He said the publishing arrangements 
were already set up in Sedona, and that I would enjoy instant 
success through promotions and distribution, if I accepted. Even 
though I greatly needed the money, I not only rejected the (OSI) 
offer, but asserted my intent and determination to publish my flying 


saucer book—a project which Jim was already aware of. 

Jim then threatened to cause harm to me if I published my 
saucer book. I was a little shocked that Jim had the bad manners to 
come to my home as a supposed "friend", with a proposal to hired 
me to write fraudulent books for the CIA. But following that up 
with a violation of my hospitality, threatening me with harm if I 
exercised my freedom of the press and speech by publishing my 
book, was too much. Though dismayed by threats from such a puny 
guy, little did I realize that I would subsequently be subjected to the 
covert power he and his associates wielded. 

Ever since that time, and the numerous events which followed, 
our "friendship"—which apparently never existed—"deteriorated" 
(i.e., became obvious for what it was). That was the background 
between Jim and I, which extended back to 1972, preceding the 
1997 Roswell gathering. Over the previous twenty-five years, I had 
seen Jim often, but following the 1977 failed attempt by him to 
recruit me as a false propaganda writer, any discussion or attempt at 
politeness was overshadowed by the secret knowledge that we both 
had. It was apparent that Jim was made very uncomfortable by my 
presence at the Roswell gathering, especially since it was so soon 
after the Heaven's Gate debacle. 

After checking into my room, I called Ron Garner, and we 
both headed for the lobby to meet. On seeing Garner, I recognized 
him as the man I'd just seen with Jim, which probably explained 
Jim's extreme discomfort. I said nothing to Garner about it, and took 
him to my room so he could examine it as a potential video 
interview room. When we returned to the lobby, I told Ron that the 
man I identified as a M.I.B. in my book was present in the lobby. He 
asked me to point him out so he could get some video footage of 
him, but when I pointed out Jim, Ron became disturbed. He soon 
took his leave, and avoided me for the rest of the conference, never 
contacting me again, or seeking to use my room for interviews. 

Toward the end of the conference, I spoke briefly with Garner, 
and asked him if he got the video footage of the "M.I.B.". He 
pretended that he didn't know who Jim was. That was implausible, 


since I had seen Ron conversing closely with Jim only a few minutes 
before, and because you couldn't miss Jim when I pointed him out, 
with such a weird hat. The hat was apparently a covert means of 
instant identification of Jim, by his intelligence operative peers, 
other dupes and phonies, from within the crowd. 

On meeting some others of the Truth Seeker contingent a day or 
so later, I was surprised to learn that Ron had engaged them in 
behind-the-scenes discussions about me the morning after my 
arrival, regarding my views on Gurdjieff, his teachings, and the 
Synergy cult. Since I hadn't discussed any of this with anyone at the 
conference except Jim, years before, I assumed that Ron's objections 
were based on Jim's objections, since the two were obviously 
connected. 

The owner of Truth Seekers, Bonny Lange, must have been 
aware of my attitude toward the Gurdjieff/Synergy cult, since I had 
made it clear in my book, which I assumed she had read, so I found 
it hard to believe that this was an integral part of the Truth Seeker 
philosophy. 

Jim's behavior didn't surprised me, since he had interfered in my 
life on many occasions in the past, but I was taken aback by the 
prior connection between Jim and another Truth Seeker 
representative, Garner. In fact, Jim had also been connected through 
the Gurdjieff relationships, with the naturopath I mention in 
Pentagon Aliens, who had attempted to murder me with arsenic, and 
almost succeeded. The naturopath was an avid Gurdjieff/Synergy 
cultist. The Synergy cult is featured very strongly in my unpublished 
manuscript entitled The Mystical Roots of Totalitarianism. 
Unfortunately, there are apparently quite a few people who are 
followers of Gurdjieff's teachings, apparently without full cognizance 
of the social consequences which have flowed from them as a matter 
of logic. 

At the time of the Roswell gathering, I was aware that Jim had 
become especially paranoid about me because I had already publicly 
identified him in my 1993 and 1995 editions of Space Aliens as a 
CIA/OSI connection, four years prior to the Heaven's Gate cult's 


alleged "mass suicide" in 1997. This must have been particularly 
disturbing to Jim, given the cult's sensationalized mass deaths, which 
appeared to be a way for the CIA to "close out" the cult, perhaps 
because it had become a "liability" after my exposure of them and 
the OSI's 'handling' of them through Jim, and since they were 
becoming a geriatric group, which had failed to produce any 
significant counterintelligence thought-control propaganda for quite 
a while. Like loose cannons, these old OSI dupes were rolling 
around on the "national security decks", and had to be belayed for 
good, as their "ship" was sent to Davy Jone's Locker, instead of to 
a comet. 

Jim was apparently in fear that I would go public, and because 
of his continued tampering, I did go public, in Space Aliens. In my 
unpublished Synergy manuscript, I go into more detail as to how the 
cultists believe that they are especially entitled to appropriate and 
use the resources of others in pursuit of a "higher purpose", defined 
only by them, pursuant to the "collective consciousness" teachings 
of Gurdjieff (which is in line with the recurring "appropriation" of 
my ideas). 

Though Gurdjieff was apparently irresponsible when it came 
to contemplating the natural consequences which would follow from 
his teachings, he was appalled when those results included the mass 
murders by the S.S. "Death's Head" Schwarze Korps (the Black 
Order, which was the S.S. planning branch), in the concentration 
camps of Europe, and the murder of millions in Russia under Stalin, 
a former Gurdjieff student. I became a target of the cult when I blew 
the cover on its infiltration of an arts group I headed in 1977-78, 
called Free Art Forum. 

The Synergy cult is especially attracted to the destruction of 
individualistic groups, which they see as their primary enemies and 
competitors, so they infiltrate them, neutralize them through the 
introduction of immiscible contradictions, and take over and use 
their resources in pursuit of their synergistic totalitarian goals. The 
cult typically uses a "divide-and-conquer" strategy, based on the 
conspiratorial equivalent to the Spartan "flying wedge". 


I had attempted to block their infiltration and appropriation of 
my group, but the Gurdjieff cult succeeded despite my resistance, 
just as the grant which funded it was about to expire. After the takeover, the group degenerated 
and was destroyed from within by its 
own "synergistic", vicious in-fighting. 

The State of New Mexico then offered me a grant for twice the 
amount of the original one—$250,000—but I turned it down 
because the state and federal government had refused to give me the 
protection I requested from the Gurdjieff group, as I eventually 
burned out from the social turmoil it created. Besides, I had initially 
been conned into becoming a partner in the grant under the false 
promise that I wouldn't be dealing with the government, since I am 
philosophically opposed to the government's involvement in the arts, 
per se, or in any other private cultural activity. 

True to form, Jim's book offer to me, just after he learned of 
my involvement in the grant, appeared to be also intended to draw 
me out of Free Art Forum, so the Synergy group—some of whom 
had already been hired by my duped partner—could take it over 
immediately. I battled along, continuing to control the group until 
the grant period expired, with tremendous wear and tear on my 
nerves, with the Synergists misplacing blame on me for their failure 
to make what was left of the group work for their "purposes". 

Soon after the end of Free Art Forum, Jim had learned through 
contact with my then current girlfriend that I had discovered his 
covert contact with my father in Arizona, after which my father had 
come to New Mexico in an attempt to convince me to abandon my 
UFO publishing plans, which astounded me at the time, until I 
discovered Jim's involvement. Thinking my father had disobeyed 
him, by telling me of his threats, Jim arranged through the CIA/OSI 
for my parents to lose their business. The fact was, I had discovered 
Jim's contact with my father through an independent witness whom 
my parents didn't even know. 

I also subsequently learned from one of my parents' fellow 
clothing dealers, who was angered and dismayed by the unjust loss 
of their hard-earned business, that one of their clients in 


Tucson—Joseph ("Papa Joe") Bonnano, the Mafia chieftain, who 
coincidentally owned a Tucson dress shop—retaliated against the 
clothing manufacturers who had been induced by the CIA to 
terminate my parents' business, because he liked my parents, and 
"smelled a rat". The buyers dropped the clothing lines in protest, 
and the manufacturers lost millions of dollars, for following the 
CIA's orders. Justice can come in strange forms sometime, and that 
was "poetic justice ", but the CIA hasn't gotten what is coming to 
it yet. 

As the conference progressed, I observed disappointment 
growing among the Truth Seeker contingent. The major portion of 
the crowd which showed up was not of the big-spender variety. As 
I saw it, the stated goals of Truth Seeker were in conflict with some 
of the material in their catalogue, especially where it played into the 
CIA-orchestrated "alien" scenario. For example, I immediately 
recognized the material of Zechariah Sitchin as a continuation of 
some of GurdjiefPs and Georg Lanz von LiebenfePs stories, the same 
as those he had, as the Cisternian monk Joseph Lanz, earlier taught 
to a youthful Adolph Hitler at Lambach Abbey in 1907. They were 
the same "teachings" spread by the Thulegesellschaft, now promoted 
by the CIA and reflected in the script of the movie Stargate, and 
continued by the TV series, Stargate SG-1. It also persues the OSI 
strategic objectives of the offer made to me by Jim in 1977. 

Several questions arose in my mind: If Garner's objection to my 
involvement with Truth Seeker was based on his adherence to 
GurdjiefPs teachings, was Truth Seeker being targeted for takeover 
by the Synergy cult? Was I being "separated out" by the "flying 
wedge" of Garner, because I was threatening to undo the cult's 
efforts? That would certainly upset Jim, as I had observed. Did Jim 
know I was being hosted by Truth Seekers before my arrival, or did 
he learn about it from Ron? Since my appearance seemed to come 
as a complete and devastating surprise to Jim, was it because he 
knew that I, of all people, might figure out the latest scam-in- 
progress? 

Ron's objections based on the Gurdjieff stuff indicated either 


that Jim had manipulated Ron through those beliefs, or that they 
were of common interest to both Jim and Ron, and that Jim feared 
I would blow their cover. After all, hadn't Sitchin written the same 
kind of books that the CIA had attempted to recruit me to write in 
1977, and weren't they often published in Santa Fe or Sedona? Did 
they really think they could convert the Truth Seeker idea to a 
Gurdjieff one? If so, they would have to change the name to "Big Lie 
Seeker". Such a conversion would make the Truth Seeker goals only 
a fake shell eaten out by the Synergy roaches, to be used as a facade 
to entrap more prey. The Truth Seeker movement was barely getting 
off the ground at the time, so a takeover by the Synergists would nip 
it in the bud. It became my intent to avert this, and to warn them, 
but it was apparently to no avail. The moth flies around and near the 
candle flame, and is eventually consumed by it. There was 
apparently no way to warn the moth against its basic attraction to 
the flame. 

By my second day at the gathering, I was already effectively 
ostracized by the major portion of the group, except for the two 
writers, David Sielaff and Paul Tice, whom I had met at the UFO 
Enigma Museum. John Price, "head" of the museum—a local guy 
who was strangely jealous and afraid of losing his grip on what little 
notoriety he had—wouldn't sell my books, so I joined the two 
writers at a table in the back room. They seemed congenial and I 
detected no conflict with them. I made the best of the moment. 

Ahh...there I was at the dusty little museum, standing not more 
than three feet from Linda Moulton Howe, a UFOlogy "biggie", as 
she discussed "aliens" with a Mr. Heik, with the same kind of 
familiarity as one might expect a believer in the Tooth Fairy to 
describe the kind of shoes he wears. Though in plain sight, the total 
invisibility with which Howe regarded me indicated that she not 
only knew who I was, but also that I knew what she was, and that 
her pretense was transparent to me. Unless she knew she was lying 
about aliens, she would never have graduated from Stanford. 

At the Truth Seeker booth at the Roswell Convention Center, 
the available chairs were occupied by the secretary, the shipping 


clerk, and astrologer Louis Turi, who used the only other chair and 
a table for his clients, so I milled about and made contact with some 
interesting people. 

Ron Garner had avoided me like the plague since the first 
evening. After learning of his character assassination of me behind 
my back the next morning, the negative behavior of several others 
associated with the group seemed explainable, but they were only 
the 'spear bearer' contingent. After being snubbed by three of the 
group—Garner, the secretary, and the shipping clerk—and several 
minor associates, it seemed that my ostracism had become final by 
my second day there, over something I hadn't discussed with them, 
and which should have been anathema to Truth Seeker. Did they 
not know? 

Had it been up to me, the secretary and shipping clerk would 
have remained in San Diego to hold down business. Louis Turi 
could have had a separate booth, since there seemed to be only a 
tenuous connection between "truth" and "astrology", but conceding 
the fact that knowledge of astrology might come in handy for 
understanding national leaders—and nuts like Hitler, who guided 
the Third Reich to Valhalla with it. Turi was more polite, and 
showed no signs of being in the petty conspiracy; as astrologers go, 
he is the best I have met. 

It didn't seem appropriate that the behavior of a secretary and 
shipping clerk, provoked by an "outside" videographer, was 
controlling the fate of the operation. True to the philosophy, 
Synergism, like the Hitler it spawned, teaches its followers to strike 
at weakness, like true sociopaths. Meanwhile, I wondered if the only 
strong members of the group remaining—Sielaff and Tice—would 
eventually succumb to the Synergy garbage. 

The Synergists are opposed to individuality, and will use 
"latitudinal" arguments and strategy to motivate their prey. That is 
where the CIA got the tactic. In fact, Gurdjieff had privately tutored 
Mao Zedong, Stalin, Alfred Rosenberg, Karl Haushoffer, Dietrich 
Eckhardt and many others of the totalitarian mind, and there were 
many Gurdjieff adepts in Reinhard Gehlen's SS Gestapo group, the 


RSHA VI, which became the core of the OSI in America. These 
teachings had been the basis of the Communist movements of Mao 
and Stalin, as well as that of the Nazis. The Nazi troop management 
manual, authored by Ernst Rohm—also a student of Gurdjieff—had 
found its way into U.S. armed forces policy, when the official Nazi 
manual was adopted by the U.S. Congress in the 1950's, as the 
official U.S. troop management manual. The general policy is 
recognized today as the "principle of group identity", which is a 
direct translation of the "collective consciousness" doctrine of 
Gurdjieff, as espoused by Captain Ernst Rohm, "Father of the 
Brownshirts", the bully-boys responsible for Krystallnacht in the 
Nazi rise to power. 

Since scapegoating is a typical tactic of the Synergists, I could 
expect an attempt back in San Diego to create and heighten a sense 
of failure of the venture, and to misplace blame for the lack of 
success somehow on me. This would mean that a heavy trip would 
be laid on me to Bonnie Lange. Whether this was another divide- 
and-conquer/takeover maneuver, only time would tell. 

A short time after the Roswell debacle, I tried to warn Bonnie 
Lange about the Synergists, and she assured me everything was 
"under control". Soon afterward, she offered me an opportunity to 
write a series of articles about "Tesla's Technology in Today's 
World," which I have included in this book, in updated form. 

I finished and submitted the first installation of my series of 
articles, and Bonnie accepted and praised it, with a lot of editorial 
cutting by her staff. She said it would be published in the magazine, 
and would also be published on their Internet web site. I waited 
patiently for news that the article had been published. In January 
1998 I got on the Internet for the first time, and opened a web site 
of my own — "Pentagon Space Aliens" 
http://members.tripod.com/~lvne4lvne/ . In browsing the Truth 
Seeker site, I not only failed to find my article, or the cataloguing of 
my book, but also noticed that the Synergy people had become a 
prominent "partner" in their organization. That, to me, suggested 
that the Synergists had either taken over Truth Seeker, or had 


conned Bonnie into a partnership. This of course appeared to 
explain the reversal of policy, and the exclusion of my book and 
article without notice to me. 

I hoped that my attempts to warn Bonnie and Truth Seeker 
would eventually start to make sense, in time to save the operation 
and to separate it from the Synergists. It was sad to see an old 
American institution which had formerly been associated with such 
powerful individualists as Mark Twain and Robert G. Ingersoll, 
being taken over by the enemy. With a lofty stated purpose which 
was, among other things, intended "...to elevate and emancipate the 
human race", and was opposed to "...everything that degrades or 
burdens mankind mentally or physically", it was tragic that the 
organization seemed to be selling out its birthright to synergistic 
totalitarianism, which is diametrically opposed to everything it stood 
for. 

When they entered that door, they risked becoming the 
ultimate hypocrisy, selling the CIA'backed lies about "aliens", while 
pretending to be "seekers of truth". I knew that there was no way 
they could close that door behind them for good, without losing 
their identity as "seekers of truth", since that is in conflict with 
being suckers for covert government propaganda. 

Among the Internet "free-thought" links of the Truth Seekers, 
I was saddened and appalled by the creepy Synergy group's featuring 
of sleazy "Japanimation" porn cartoons, clearly appealing to sick 
pedophiles, with illustrations of things like child sex, snuff, torture, 
bondage and sadism. These were only cartoons, but the mental 
attitude appealed to was unmistakable. This link misrepresented and 
effectively smeared the idea of free-thought, falsely equating it with 
pedophilia, sadism, child sexual abuse, torture and murder. 

This clearly wasn't opposed to "everything that degrades or 
burdens mankind mentally or physically", but more its opposite. 
Since when have the secret cravings of sex criminals been elevated 
to the level of "...brave new thoughts"? Why didn't they feature 
some saucy sex scenes from the torture chambers of Treblinka or 
Dachau while they were at it? Oh yes...some starkly graphic 


recreations of the spicy escapades of that well-known "free thinker", 
Jeffrey Dahmer shouldn't be left out either! (Not to exclude that 
Debonair Devil of Dead-Dame Debauchery, Ed Gein, whose "arts 
and crafts" with human body parts were simply "emancipating"!) 
As a Libertarian, I don't advocate censorship of any speech or 
thought whatsoever, but consider these bizarre public associations 
between Truth Seekers and the sexual exploitation of children by 
the Synergists, to be an attempt to give the "kiss of death" to the 
Truth Seeker ideology, suggesting approval of something which is 
not endemic to "free thought", as a kind of fraud. 

It's a good thing such groups don't hold an exclusive franchise 
on that thing called "free thought", since, in the event of their 
demise, there might be no one to pick up the torch of truth and 
carry it forward from where they fell. I must be a little old-fashioned 
for continuing to believe that someone should say what they mean, 
and mean what they say. When someone starts out as a Truth 
Seeker, and ends up repeating the same OLD TIRED BIG LIES as 
the rest of the gang, they have lost their way, and are little more 
than a hypocrite. What this Truth Seeker found was a 
disappointment of lies and hypocrisy. 

In retrospect, I thank Truth Seeker and Bonnie Lange for 
sponsoring my truth, which had apparently been officially banned by 
those who ruled the Roswell Hoax 50th Anniversary gathering. I was 
truly an "alien" at that gathering, but the trip was priceless to me. 
Only the "biggie" alien liars of UFOlogy were invited to speak 
at the Roswell conference. Naturally, I was not considered, even in 
a debate, because the CIA must control both sides of it. The 
speakers' usual exorbitant fees were in direct proportion to the 
magnitude of the Big Lies in Big Brother's false propaganda. In 
retrospect, I should have taken up a position on the sidewalk, with 
a stack of my books and a sign which read: 

"FREE SPEECH HERE: WHY PAY TO HEAR A ONESIDED 
STORY? YOU CAN GET THE OTHER SIDE HERE FOR 
FREE. MEANWHILE, MY BOOK IS FOR SALE, BUT I AM 
NOT." 


CHAPTER VII - FUZZY UFOLOGY: 
Keeping the Dupes Stupid 

This chapter is to teach you how to analyze UFOlogy, 
something covered more completely in Pentagon Aliens. Here, I give 
a brief overview of covert intelligence agency operations in the UFO 
field, point out the presence of agents posing as "UFOlogists" or 
"Skeptics", along with the "official government spokesmen", and 
show how they intermesh to maintain control of the field. I also 
highlight the incredible, statistically-challenging complicity of many 
dupes, who seem to be unaware of CIA control. I also describe the 
CIA's "M.O.", for use as a measuring instrument to detect CIA 
influence, control or complicity. I also describe some of my 
experiences with the military, the government, political parties, the 
CIA and military intelligence agencies, as background information 
which influences my judgments. Therefore, in this chapter let us 
step back and take an objective look at the UFOlogy field through 
my eyes, as I address the following, in part: 

. That American "fuzzy" UFOlogy and the "alien" scenario 
were created by the government and CIA, as heir to the Nazi 
mass-psychology program, to conceal exclusively man-made 
UFOs, and enlarge the credulity of the public, to facilitate its 
acceptance of other Big Lies. 
. That early (post WW II) UFO reports, books and movies, 
written by CIA'directed spooks, gave the public whatever 
misinformation the CIA wanted it to have. (Example: 
Kenneth Arnold's sightings have been debunked...as a false 
report describing saucers as boomerang-shaped... Arnold 
worked for the spooks.) 
. That the 1947 "Roswell Incident" was created by the 
government, which initiated the first "credible" "alien- 
visitors" premise in its initial press releases by intelligence 

officer Walther Haut (a "P.I.O.", or Public Information 
Officer, an intelligence position). The news release was then 
redacted, making it look like a cover-up. CIA-directed 
UFOlogy picked up from there on out. 

. That, in 1955, the major nations...including Russia...had a 
meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, and agreed to keep UFO 
reports secret from the public. They all had UFO technology, 
so they weren't hiding it from each other. 
. That subsequent public "UFO reports" were filtered through 
the government's Project Bluebook, etc. Bluebook was a 
CIA/OSI project designed to 'intercept' the public's reports, 
to prevent the disclosure to the public of what was actually 
seen. "Real" reports were kept secret, and only CIA-
fabricated, misinformational reports were "released". 
. That UFO technology is primarily an energy and 
transportation secret, having the potential to end control by 
the world's corporate and totalitarian states and the coercive- 
monopolist corporate power structure. Concealment of the 
technology relates to maintaining the grip of coercive-
monopolist status quo, not to "national security". 
The CIA's Omnipresence in UFOlogy 

In the world of UFO literature, the CIA has been pervasive. 
Even though some of this is partly paranoid imaginings, when all the 
pure paranoia is swept aside, the CIA's presence is still conspicuous 
in regard to UFOs. This presence is incongruous, given the 
government's official denials of the existence of UFOs: That is, 
unless one accepts the thesis which I put forth in my books, which 
is perfectly logical. It is also perfectly consistent that the CIA created 
"fuzzy UFOlogy" (the CIA would in fact have been remiss in its 


duties if it hadn't done so), through the covert branches of the 
Office of Scientific Intelligence (OSI). 

As an intelligence operation, invested with the duty to carry 
out its duties for the coercive-monopolies and the government, there 
were two paramount "strategic objectives" which the OSI was 
required to pursue, which were (1) to conceal the science of UFO 
electro dynamic space propulsion technology, by whatever means 
necessary, and (2) to enlarge the public's credulity so it would 
believe the "space alien" lies, and whatever other lies of a more 
political nature that the government wished it to. 

In keeping with these two strategic objectives, I have outlined 
what I consider to be the OSI modus operandi in pursuit of them, 
covered probably more extensively in Pentagon Aliens. By measuring 
a certain UFOlogist's or Paranormalist's M.O. against that of the 
OSI, one can ascertain the relative probability that he or she (don't 
forget "Linda Molting Cow") either takes their marching orders 
directly from the CIA, or is so cozy with the CIA that it really 
doesn't matter whether or not they are on its payroll. Since they 
virtually do its work for it as if they were, they either wittingly help 
the CIA, or else are incredibly stupid dupes. Either way, all 
UFOlogists are 'incriminated', either by their actual witting 
employment by the CIA, or by their negligence in failing to realize 
their own complicity when under a duty to find out, as a 
"responsible investigator." 

An admitted association with the CIA once enhanced a 
UFOlogist's credibility. This previously decorative veneer has eroded 
away over the years to reveal shabby underlying layers of cheap 
fabrications and lies, due to the many incidents which have made 
the CIA's name synonymous with dishonest and untrustworthy 
behavior. Today, UFOlogists whose covers as CIA operatives have 
been blown are usually washed up. Naturally, such UFOlogists try 
to maintain their covers. 

Some UFOlogists with once-assumed CIA connections now 
deny any connections whatsoever. That, too, would seem 
incongruous with regard to a UFOlogist who, for example, was once 


a trusted employee of a so-called "civilian" agency which had the 
exclusive government mission to collect and classify as secret all 
reports of actual or alleged UFO sightings. It would be sailing very, 
very close to the wind for that UFOlogist to say he had no 
intelligence connections. I don't think J. Allen Hynek ever made 
such a denial, but you can correct me if I'm wrong. 

My old graduate school friend, Phil Shaw, Col., (retired), Air 
Force Intelligence, was in charge of two Project Bluebook 
offices—one in Reykjavik, Iceland, and the other in Reno, 
Nevada—so don't try to tell me that the project was not connected 
to intelligence. In Pentagon Aliens, I relate how embarrassing to 
Shaw it was, when, during a heated (yet friendly) argument between 
Phil and I, I took some students in one of our life drawing classes at 
the University of Texas out in the hall, and showed them that the 
lock on his locker was "CIA issue". As Phil grimaced, I exclaimed, 
"Sheesh, Phil! Are you so tight you have to use an agency lock?". 

One of the things which once went with intelligence agency 
enhancement was the assumption that a UFOlogist who had access 
to Project Bluebook's secret reports—to which normal citizens had 
NO access—should be accepted as patently truthful and accurate. 
This is ridiculous, since that UFOlogist would be subject to 
prosecution under the National Security Act for disclosing classified 
information, and whatever is implied from the secret reports, 
without producing the actual classified reports, is mere hearsay. 

The aura of "high credentials" is now used to enhance the 
"credibility" of UFOlogists, to induce acceptance of CIA- concocted 
lies, to convince the public that UFOs are extraterrestrial, that the 
government conducts secret liaisons with alien civilizations—based 
on alleged "leaks" from "inside" sources—or that human life on 
earth was "engineered" by "reptilian aliens". These are the favorite 
BIG lies used by the CIA's OSI to achieve their two most important 
strategic objectives. 

The prolific use of allegedly "classified documents" from 
"inside sources" ignores the fact that such documents would have 
been retrieved at the point of a gun, and contained by the 


intelligence community, with their purveyors prosecuted, while the 
public availability of the documents marks them as fraudulent 
fabrications, created and disseminated by intelligence agencies in 
pursuit of so-called strategic objectives. 

The frequent use of credibility-enhanced, professional 
UFOlogists, with high academic or military titles, such as "Ph.D.", 
"Colonel", etc., naturally raises the question as to why those with 
such "high" credentials would involve themselves in attempting to 
derive incomes as befits their educations from the risky business of 
UFOlogy, unless they were already provided with substantial covert 
incomes from intelligence coffers. In their writings and speeches, it 
seems that these UFOlogists will invariably only cite the alleged 
"documentation" of other CIA assets. This incestuous, fraudulent 
process is a matter of CIA UFOlogy policy, to never cite another 
researcher unless they are a controlled asset, in order to maintain 
control of the whole field, thus avoiding unpredictable results which 
might threaten that control. 

My Mind and Thought-Control Ordeals 

A well-known "UFOlogy lawyer"—who is himself a CIA 
tool—apparently alarmed that I "had his number", accused me of 
attempting to use my "credentials" (what credentials?) to gain 
credibility (his own tactic) but the only association I ever had with 
an intelligence agency was my short stint in Air Force Intelligence, 
in 1957-58, at a pay of around $160.00 per month. I subsequently 
have had minimal contact with the intelligence community, in the 
sense that, on occasion, on a voluntary basis, as a concerned citizen, 
I tried to warn our government, whenever I perceived what I 
believed to be threats to American safety, security and well-being. 

Here, I briefly describe some (but not all) of my encounters in 
which, as a would-be responsible citizen, I rendered considerable 
service to my country several times, "..above and beyond the call of 
duty...", and in every single case, I was punished, insulted, abused, 
injured and dishonored. I was never so much as given a "thank 


you". Instead of being thanked or honored even in the slightest way, 
I was severely and cruelly punished. It came as a severe and 
traumatic shock to my naive and idealistic mind to think that my 
government would not only allow such things to be done to me, but 
to do them to me itself. I suffered deeply because of it, and the 
indelible and painful marks on my mind will never go away. 

In my first experience, at the age of 18, as an Air Force basic 
trainee in 1956, I had uncovered a 5-man cell of KGB agents 
running the Air Force Career Counseling Center, at Lackland AFB 
in San Antonio, Texas sabotaging personnel records, mis-assigning 
trainees, and even routing their own agents into Air Force Counter- 
intelligence. This discovery created a chain reaction which 
eventually 'rolled over' on Col. Rudolf Abel (alias William Fisher), 
the Soviet Western Hemisphere Chief of KGB Espionage 
Operations, whose special training was in sabotage. The FBI, on its 
website, says Abel was arrested in New York City around June 21 st, 
1957, but this may be a cover-story lie. The FBI takes credit for 
everything, another lie. If I hadn't discovered the cell, operating 
right under the noses of the "counterintelligence experts" for years, 
they would probably have never known who Abel was. 

The Texas cell was handled by Mikhail Nikolaevich Svirin, 
Soviet ambassador to the U.N., Col. Abel's subordinate and 
intermediary to the cell. Svirin got wind of my exposure of his spies 
and immediately returned to Moscow, leaving no intermediary. 
Lucky for Eisenhower, Svirin had diplomatic immunity, so the FBI 
didn't have to arrest or to stop him from returning to Moscow, the 
Soviet government didn't have to lodge a noisy and falsely indignant 
protest with the American embassy or the U.N., and the 
Republicans didn't have to explain how this very serious national 
security breach occurred under their administration. 

The arrest of the Russian ambassador to the U.N. for espionage 
would certainly have aroused public suspicion, and the FBI had 
strict orders to avoid public exposure of the incident. Meanwhile, 
the FBI still didn't know who Svirin's superior was. That was the 
way things remained until 1957, a year later. 


Conveniently for the FBI, Finnish KGB agent Reino Hayhanen 
had defected in May, 1957, in Paris, and was moved in by the FBI 
to fill Svirin's slot in Abel's sabotage and espionage network, 
enabling him to identify Abel. Abel was arrested, charged with 
espionage, prosecuted, convicted and sentenced, and was eventually 
traded for U-2 pilot Gary Francis Powers in 1962. 

Because I had uncovered Abel's Air Force records-sabotage 
operation, the Air Force, without my knowledge at the time, 
ostensibly re-assigned me to Air Force Intelligence immediately 
following the confirmation of my discovery. After what should have 
been the perception by the Air Force that I might be useful in the 
intelligence field, the Air Force then proceeded under an ulterior 
Republican-created political agenda to attempt to assassinate me, 
then to punish me, then to completely waste and ruin whatever 
potential or talent I may have had for intelligence work, after its 
attempt to murder me failed, which instead of killing me, "only" 
caused a permanent neurological disability. 

From a consideration of the circumstances, my knowledge, 
and the evidence I have gathered thus far, it appears that 
"Republican intelligence agents" and Air Force spooks tricked me 
into taking a prescription of a neurotoxic drug, by having an agent 
give me a cup of bad coffee during a student coffee break, thus 
requiring me to go to sick call, where it was arranged that a doctor 
prescribe the poisonous drug which was then given to me by the 
pharmacist. It was the pure, "100% extract of belladonna", rather 
than the 10% "tincture" solution, a dosage which was ten times the 
prescribed dosage. Therefore, the dosage—"24 drops of in warm 
water before meals, three times per day" (72 drops per day)—was 
the equivalent to 720 drops of tincture of belladonna per day, and 
clearly a potentially lethal dosage, with little doubt remaining that 
the intent was to effect my death, to be explained posthumously as 
a "suicide" or "accidental overdose". 

On Nov. 6, 1956, the presidential election was held, and Ike 
had won. Before I had even met Commander Thomas B. Hayward, 
I had already been poisoned and had survived. As a Republican 


naval officer, connected to the O.N.I, Hayward's job apparently had 
to do with carrying out an illegal political order from the Eisenhower 
Re-election Committee—possibly on request from Vice-President 
Richard Nixon or the fanatical right wing SAC head, General 
LeMay—to shut me up at all costs. The first indication that the 
spooks were involved in my fate was when I had been chosen just 
prior to the poisoning, by an Airborne jumpmaster who had come 
to Keesler, to be the "combat controller", in Ike's contemplated U.S. 
military intervention in Hungary during the revolt of 1956. This was 
apparently a "last minute" grandstand play concocted either by 
Eisenhower or Nixon—more likely by Nixon—to "insure" their re- 
election. I'll wager that Nixon pushed it and Eisenhower stopped it. 

As the Combat Controller, I would have been the first man on 
the ground, where I was to set up a landing operation for our entire 
invasion, spearheaded by airborne divisions, and to land our planes 
in a massive assault. It was a tall order for an 18-year-old kid. I was 
led to believe that I was chosen because I was in superb physical 
condition, knew how to shoot, and was pretty tough. They wanted 
a man who could survive at least long enough to carry out the job of 
getting our forces on the ground so they could engage the Russian 
troops. Like a fool, I was ready, willing and able to do it. 

In retrospect, I realized that I would have probably been one 
of the first men killed, thus eliminating any further problem of a 
possible leak regarding the KGB's record-setting records-sabotage 
operation. There would have been a 97% chance of my being killed 
in the operation. Lucky for me, the plan to intervene in Hungary 
was abandoned by Eisenhower, so it was time for plan of elimination 
of Airman William Lyne #2, which was to poison me. 

Here is a case where covert intelligence operatives within the 
military were involved in a purely partisan, attempted political 
assassination of a loyal American military man to cover up a 
politically explosive spy scandal, because it might have prevented a 
Republican politician's re-election. And for that reason alone, they 
actually coddled the Soviet agents, and helped the Soviets keep the 
spy scandal secret from the American and Russian people! 


After I had begun to take the belladonna as prescribed—which 
was the equivalent of 720 drops of tincture of belladonna per day—I 
became so confused that I did not even realize that my disorientation 
was caused by the belladonna. Belladonna is a hypnotic neurotoxin, 
composed of several alkaloids, including scopolamine, one of the 
drugs of choice for Nazi SS interrogators during WW II. Because of 
its horrible effects, it could induce many subjects to talk rather than 
to be forced to endure another dose of the drug. According to one 
of my dictionaries, scopolamine is, "A drug used to dilate pupils of 
eyes, as a depressant, to produce a partial stupor known as "twilight 
sleep", and to induce confession in criminals." 

At that point, I began to have uncontrollable sleep attacks in 
class, which caused the instructors to begin disciplinary measures, 
and to do such things as to slap a stick loudly on the table in front 
of me whenever I began to drop off. This caused PTSD (post 
traumatic stress disorder). Even when being humiliated, by being 
ordered to stand at attention during class in front of a large floor fan 
having no protective grille on it, I still fell asleep. Thanks to a quick- 
thinking fellow student, who blocked my fall just as I lost 
consciousness, and was falling into the fan blades, a serious accident 
was narrowly averted. I was then cruelly hauled before boards of 
review, in my disoriented state, where I was ordered to explain why 
I kept falling asleep in class. I could only answer, "I don't know, Sir, 
but I can't help it." 

I was then ordered to appear before the commandant of the 
GCA school—an eccentric warrant officer, who wore Napoleonic 
locks (I swear I'm not making this up)—joined by a master sergeant 
named Ackermann. The two promised me that, if I could make it 
through the school, they would make me a part of their intelligence 
"team" on a covert mission into Port Said, Egypt. I found out that 
the warrant officer and the sergeant were both colonels, using 
assumed names and ranks. It appeared that they were unaware that 
I was being poisoned. Meanwhile, I was still unaware that the 
belladonna was even a poison, or that it was causing the problem, so 
I could produce no plausible excuse, or even bring up the issue. My 


judgment was severely clouded, to say the least. The two officers 
must have been Democrats, who were unaware of the secret 
Republican plan to eliminate me, unless the "covert mission" was 
another plan of elimination. 

About that time, as I was visiting the base service club in the 
evening, I was approached by two intelligence agents, and asked, 
"Are you William R. Lyne, AF 18510695?" I answered "Yes." One 
of the agents then said, "We're here to inform you that the KGB cell 
you uncovered at Lackland was caught. Your report to the adjutant 
turned out to be true. We are breaking security procedures by even 
telling you about this, because the incident is classified, so don't tell 
anyone we are involved. We know you are having troubles, so we 
will try to help you." 

Belladonna in such a high dosage makes you look and act like 
a zombie, a virtual "living dead". I could neither sleep restfully at 
night, nor awaken fully during the day. At night, I began to hang out 
alone in the numerous dives in Biloxi, Mississippi. Due to my 
disorientation, my inability to explain my sudden sleep attacks, and 
the morbid and melancholy effects of the belladonna, together with 
my being washed out of the GCA school at no fault of my own, I 
became very distraught, even suicidal. I had been a top student, 
wide-awake and promising, but I was going down, and there was 
nothing I could do in my drugged state of mind to stop it. 

While in one of the Biloxi bars, after midnight on a weekend, 
I was visited again by two different intelligence agents, who said they 
would try to help me, even though regulations prohibited them from 
doing so. In retrospect, years later, that all seemed so very strange to 
me, that they had to "violate regulations" in order to help an airman 
who had discovered a KGB cell, done his fellow Air Force members 
a great service, saved the taxpayers many millions of dollars, and was 
being poisoned, washed out of his school, and demoted. Again, these 
guys didn't seem to be part of the political assassination squad, 
because they didn't try to attribute blame to the KGB. As 
professional intelligence agents, at least they knew that the KGB 
couldn't have manipulated everything on the base. They probably 


knew my "problems" were political ones anyway, but couldn't say 
more. 

There being absolutely no legal representative to fight for me, 
even myself, while under diminished capacity, in a stupor, I signed 
whatever papers they put before me, just to try to make the 
problems go away. After I was removed from the school, demoted, 
fined, and placed on menial detail, I stopped taking the belladonna. 
The extreme melancholia subsided, but the symptoms of narcolepsy 
remained. 

At that point, in spite of the poisoning, I had survived. In 
retrospect, I now realize that, before the November 6th election, I 
was supposed to die from a "drug overdose", undoubtedly to be 
explained subsequently as a "probable suicide", due to my "apparent 
despondency over being washed out of the school", a despondency 
which they had so skillfully created through the MK-Ultra, trauma-
based mind control methods, by which time the bottle of uncut 
belladonna extract would probably have been replaced by a "10% 
tincture solution", to cover the conspirators' tracks. 

But my survival had created another problem: To prevent me 
from discovering that the poisoning had caused the "discipline" 
problems and the narcolepsy, and from realizing that it was part of 
the Republican plan to eliminate me. That was when Republican 
Tom Hayward was chosen to visit with me. 

The spooks must have asked themselves, "Who is an absolutely 
loyal, trustworthy Republican officer, who can be relied upon to do 
our dirty work, to go to Keesler, to gain Lyne's confidence, and 
convince him that the KGB, and not the Republican party or the Air 
Force is responsible for his brain injury?" The fact that Hayward was 
Navy and not Air Force, should have told me that the problem 
originated outside the Air Force, but after all, I was still taking the 
drug, and my judgment was clouded. The drug also enhances one's 
suggestibility, something discovered by Nazi interrogators. Eddie 
Hayward, Tom Hayward's younger brother, was my roommate and 
friend, in whom I sometimes confided, so that, together with 
Hayward's high rank—his "enhanced credibility"—could be used to 


convince me that neither the Air Force nor the Republican party 
had anything to do with my strange, inexplicable problems. 

The idea that all the circumstances—such as my medical 
condition—would be unknown to the intelligence agencies during 
the bogus "national security" covert operation, was ludicrous. In 
such a case, every single circumstance would be known. The Air 
Force knew all along why I was having uncontrollable sleep attacks, 
because they had ordered the poisoning, and they knew exactly what 
the effects of belladonna in a large dosage would be. 

After I had survived, and exhibited for the first time the classic 
symptoms of narcolepsy, they also knew, in November, 1956, what 
the medical profession did not learn until the year 2000, that 
narcolepsy could be caused by the ingestion of neurotoxins, because 
they can destroy specialized protein cells in the hypothalamus which 
produce hypocretin (A.K.A. "orexin"), the hormone which regulates 
sleep and diet. Of course, hypocretin had not even been discovered 
in 1956, but the Air Force knew very well that I had been converted 
from an exceptionally sharp-witted and "wide awake" airman, to a 
narcoleptic after ingestion of the drug. 

There was no longer any talk of making me part of a "covert 
intelligence team." By that time, the Air Force knew that I was 
permanently damaged. I could no longer consider becoming a jet 
pilot or an air traffic controller, because I had narcolepsy, and they 
knew it. In fact, one of the 'counselors' they sent me to, a 
disgruntled major (who was not a psychologist, but had been 
assigned to a detail counseling airmen, because he had a college 
course in psychology), told me I had narcolepsy, but then 
misinformed me, saying that it was a purely "psychological 
problem"—a "defense mechanism"—which was my "...attempt to 
avoid taking responsibility for my actions, by falling asleep." That of 
course was his "basic Freud 101" speaking, which was wrong. That 
was clearly a fraudulent, spook-designed "diagnosis" which was 
intended to make me think it was all "my fault". 

They pretended not to know about the belladonna, but my 
medical record would be in the investigative file in such a case. It 


may turn out in the future that the evidence of the belladonna 
prescription was obliterated from my records. After all, they had 
covered their tracks very well up to that point, so why not? The fact 
that they had gone to such extremes of bogus psychology, and of 
using high-ranking liars, to avoid MY discovery of THEIR 
responsibility for causing my narcolepsy, and all the other so-called 
"discipline problems" I had, despite the obvious fact that similar 
problems would continue so long as I remained in the Air Force, 
showed that they had no concern for my human rights, and were 
willing to go to any extremes to achieve their ends. 

Commander Thomas Hayward came to Keesler and went with 
Eddie and me to our squadron mess hall for our Thanksgiving 
dinner, in 1956, which was on the early date of Nov. 15, because 
Nov. 1 had fallen on a Thursday. He was warm and friendly, a 
decorated Navy hero in WW II, who had been awarded the Navy 
Cross for having removed a hot shell casing from a large naval gun 
on a battleship, which was jammed in the breech, during a battle in 
the South Pacific. By removing the shell with his bare arms, burning 
them, in order to get the big gun back into operation, he had 
purportedly risked life and limb, "above and beyond the call of 
duty". He made a favorable impression on me, as reflected in my 
book, Pentagon Aliens, since, at the time of its writing, I had not yet 
become aware of his duplicity and betrayal of my trust. 

Tom knew all about my discovery of the KGB cell, down to the 
last detail. He said he had come to "help" me. He told me that he 
believed that my problems were "being caused by the KGB". His 
younger brother, Eddie, had been with me ever since basic training 
and the Lackland Bugle Corps, in which I was first bugler. I had left 
Lackland with an "excellent" rating. There was no sign of narcolepsy 
there, or anywhere else before my enlistment. 

In the GCA school, I had been one of about three top students 
who vied for the top scores. My grades were later falsified to make 
me look like a poor student, and to justify my removal from the 
school for "sleeping in class", "improper attitude", and "insufficient 
grades." Later, I would receive an FAA certificate by mail, which 


had the proper grades I had made on the written tests for Control 
Tower Operator, and they were good grades, quite at odds with 
those shown in my records. I guess the conspirators missed that one. 
The label "improper attitude" was due to the fact, even when 
threatened and coerced while I was under the effects of the drug, 
that I still wouldn't "admit" that I was willfully falling asleep, 
because I knew that I had gotten plenty of sleep, had never had the 
problem before, and had exerted every bit of will-power I could 
muster, in effort to stay awake, to no avail. 

Eddie had seen me go from a top student and airman, to a 
broken and dejected, stupefied wash-out, who was the victim of 
poisoning and drug-induced narcolepsy, which was permanent. 

I appreciated what appeared to be genuine support from Tom, 
though I didn't quite understand his reasoning regarding the KGB 
being responsible for my sleep attacks, and hadn't even become 
aware of the permanent narcolepsy, or connected it to the 
belladonna, because I was still taking the drug and was in "twilight 
sleep" at the time. I hadn't even begun to separate the temporary 
effects of belladonna ingestion. Those particularly severe effects 
were gone after I stopped taking it, at which point I then began to 
distinguish them from the permanent effects of narcolepsy, which I 
was just learning about and trying to understand, without any 
technical information regarding the condition. 

I unsuccessfully tried very hard to get the problem under 
control. Going to bed early in the evening didn't stop or alleviate the 
problem, or even help it very much, which was a mystery to me, 
since it had never happened before. I would not connect all of the 
symptoms of narcolepsy, which I had experienced since October 
1956, until I would read an article on narcolepsy in Psychology 
Today in 1977. For the first time in 21 years, I connected all the 
various classic symptoms of narcolepsy which I had exhibited since 
October 1956, just after I had begun taking the drug. 

My first "hypnogogic hallucination" was while I was napping 
in my dormitory room, as Eddie Hayward sat in a chair nearby, 
working on a letter. My friends—Eddie Hayward, Joseph di Paulo, 


and William Passmore—seemed to feel sorry for me, to see such a 
"sharp guy" like me go down. They must have thought I had gone 
crazy or something, or was becoming an alcoholic. 

I was deceived by Tom Hayward for 44 years. It wasn't until 
late 2000, when I began to look closely at my old Air Force records, 
that I began to put it all into focus. Tom had detailed knowledge of 
the "classified" incident, which I had initially thought was due to his 
connection to ONI, but unless he had a "need to know", he 
shouldn't have been given access, or even have known about the 
incident or been inquisitive about it enough to seek access. His 
access had to do with carrying out the plan to shut me up, after the 
Nov. 6th election. 

It recently became clear to me that his purpose was political 
damage control, after the fact. Covert Air Force intelligence 
operatives involved in the Republican plan had tried to murder me, 
intending to make it look like a suicide or an accidental drug 
overdose, but I had survived, but was left with a permanent 
neurological disability. Investigation even of that alone could lead 
back to the original motive, means and persons involved. That left 
the problem that I might figure it out, and attempt to get an 
investigation and possible prosecution of the criminals who had 
given the orders for my elimination, or that I might somehow get the 
information to the press. That could implicate the Republican party 
and maybe even Eisenhower himself. This was "Proto-Watergate", 
and probably involved Vice-President Nixon, since it had the 
imprint of his "M.O." 

I find it very hard to accept the fact that a man of such high 
reputation, rank and warm personality, such as Tom Hayward, 
could lend himself to such an evil scheme, to deceive an innocent 
18'year-old boy—who had performed admirably, by uncovering a 
nest of KGB records-saboteurs—into believing that "the Commies" 
had caused all his problems. When I reconsidered all the facts, in 
April 2001, I realized that the orders for an "executive action" 
(assassination) and cover-up, required Eisenhower's authorization. 

Like Eisenhower, Tom was a loyal Republican. Republicans 


were very strong in the Navy elite, Tom's forte. After all, hadn't he 
been a close friends with "The Little Giant", Senator John Tower, 
a former Navy carrier pilot? Hadn't he rose to the rank of Rear 
Admiral promoted to Chief of Naval Operations, under the 
Republican administration of Ronald Reagan? Was this his reward 
for dutifully playing the "political dirty tricks" game since 1956? 

Ike or Nixon was apparently fearful of a political backlash 
from my discovery that Communist agents had brazenly sabotaged 
the Air Force Personnel Center, on their watch, right under the 
noses of the CIA, Air Force Intelligence and the FBI, a spy scandal 
which had secretly come to light in the wake of the 1956 
presidential election. An 18-year-old total amateur, airman 3rd 
class, had exposed their gross ineptitude. If it reached the public, 
this could throw the election to the Democrats. That airman 3rd 
class (me) wasn't covered by a national security secrecy order, so he 
could talk about what he knew to the press, since he had acquired 
his knowledge of the incident through "innocent means." 

To the President, I was apparently a greater threat than the 
Communist agents, who were not even prosecuted. The treatment 
I received was much worse than that given to the Communist 
agents, who were merely transferred to the Army, so they could be 
"watched more closely." I, on the other hand, had been given a "life 
sentence" to the "prison of narcolepsy", without a possibility of 
parole. 

News of the incident could have influenced the election to be 
held on Nov. 6th, during which time I was turned into a zombie. 
The brownie-point-sucking Republican naval officer, Tom Hayward, 
was sent to lie to me, to use his high credentials and winning 
personality to protect Ike's career, probably at the request of Richard 
Nixon and General Curtis LeMay. 

It was an ironic turn of events, considered in retrospect. In 
1955, Eisenhower had come to Waco, Texas, on the campaign trail. 
During the parade through downtown Waco, I watched the parade 
on T.V. with my grandmother, Nancy Lou Bertha (Richardson) 
Lyne, in my aunt's house, near Guthrie Drive. As the parade ended, 


the phone rang, and Grandma Lyne answered. In a few minutes, she 
mysteriously asked me to accompany her outside. It was a chilly, 
cloudy and windy day. We walked out to a small hillock just outside 
the rear fence, about 50 yards from the intersection of Guthrie Drive 
and a major highway. 

A long, black, open-topped Lincoln limousine eased up on the 
shoulder of the road. President Eisenhower stood up, faced us, and 
waved his arm. Grandma had a little white hanky, which she waved 
in the wind, as tears streaked down her cheeks. No one else was 
present, except Eisenhower, two men in the limousine, my grandma, 
and I. My boyhood friend's father, the Chief of Secret Service, 
Charles Warren, Sr., a Southern Cheyenne, was one of the men in 
the car. 

Ike and Grandma stood for a moment, viewing one another 
wistfully across the distance, then Eisenhower slowly sat back down, 
and the limousine slowly pulled away, as Grandma sobbed quietly 
into her handkerchief, and we returned to the house. 

The only possible connection I could make between Grandma 
and Ike was the fact that she had lived in San Antonio with my 
Aunt Opal, just after my grandfather's death in 1922, which was the 
same time that Ike was stationed at Ft. Sam Houston Army Base. 
My coach in Waco, "Maj" William Kiethly, had been on Ike's staff 
during WW II, just as my cousin's father-in-law, retired Air Force 
Colonel Reinhart had been. Colonel Reinhart had gone to his grave 
with the belief that the Air Force was incapable of corruption, the 
shining example of a moral force for good that he had known in 
WW II and afterward. Major Kiethly had a high opinion of me. 
Someone procured a Presidential appointment to the Air Force 
Academy, from Eisenhower, for me, when I entered the Air Force 
at age 17, but I couldn't accept it because I was a high school drop- 
out. 

In 1956, Eisenhower had apparently ordered my elimination, 
either that, or someone below him had done the dirty deed, but the 
motive was to protect the White House from the political 
repercussions of a spy scandal which showed military stupidity under 


a general/president. That may have been considered unforgivable by 
enough of the American electorate to upset the election results. 

It was not until late 2000 that I discovered that I had been 
reassigned to intelligence, while I was still in GCA school, and 
before I was given the poison and removed from the school. 

A few days after Tom's visit in 1956,1 attended a lecture at 
the base theater, by Sir Arthur C. Clarke, on "Unidentified Aerial 
Phenomena". Clarke's lecture was based on the lie that flying 
saucers were not even real, and that all sightings could be explained 
as mirages, weather anomalies, weird clouds, etc. 

After the lecture, I approached the podium, filed through a 
short line, and introduced myself to Clarke with a handshake, 
saying, "Dr. Clarke, I'm very pleased to meet you. I enjoyed your 
lecture, but both you and I know that you're a goddamned liar, and 
that flying saucers are real, man-made flying machines, powered by 
electricity. I saw one of them up close in 1953, so I know they are 
real, and you could see the electrical discharges, so you can't fool 
me." 

Clarke smiled wryly, as he shook my hand, and said that he 
was glad to meet me also. I knew that Clarke knew the truth, but 
had been appointed by the British Intelligence Services, the CIA, 
and the U.S.A.F., to come to Keesler and probably many other 
American bases, to use his prestige and speaking skills to convince 
regular Air Force personnel that flying saucers did not even exist. 

Only the elite knew the truth, except for me. 
He represented the official, government, "pseudo-skeptical" 
position in the "twopronged attack", his high credentials being intended to add 
credibility to his lies. 

I wondered what it was like for Clarke to meet an 18-year-old 
American airman third-class, who wasn't fooled in the least. The 
fact that he was not angered by my accusation showed that he had 
a reserved appreciation for my rationality, and was not insulted by 
the truth. He was ordered to lie, but here was a young man who 
knew it! 

About three days later, I was sent to a "personnel pool", where 


I was "reassigned" to the intelligence field (even though my records 
show that I had already been reassigned to intelligence, weeks 
before, pursuant to a mysterious, secret, "Report # 5"). 

Even though they tried to make me believe that the KGB was 
responsible, I now reject that idea because that would have required 
them to have control over the guy who gave me the bad coffee 
(possible), the medical appointments clerk and the doctor he 
assigned me to, and the pharmacist (very unlikely). This caused a 
permanent, neurological disorder, which made me unfit for "military 
intelligence" (excuse the oxymoronic expression) work, because I 
had no treatment or medication whatsoever for the disorder at the 
time. I was viciously and tortuously kicked out of the GCA school 
I was in, was demoted, given an Article 15 as disciplinary 
punishment, fined, dishonored, and placed on demeaning details as 
further punishment. After having done that, the Air Force 
transferred me to Lockbourne AFB, Ohio, gave me a Top Secret 
Clearance in an effort to shut me up, and buried me in an obscure 
SAC intelligence office, as an intelligence clerk. There, still without 
medical treatment, the same vicious punishment was continued 
until the time of my discharge, all because of the uncontrollable 
symptoms I suffered from their poisoning of me. 

The reason for all this cruel treatment was pure politics. 
Specifically, the 1956 Eisenhower Re-election Committee, the 
Republican Party, and Dwight Eisenhower feared that my discovery, 
if made known to the public, could throw the election to the 
Democrats. Maybe this came from Nixon, well-known for his 
underhanded tactics, I would say. I had uncovered a KGB operation 
which had sabotaged the nerve center of the entire Air Force. The 
KGB agents were responsible for the sabotage of the records of, and 
potential mis-assignment of everyone coming into the Air Force 
during their time in operation...many thousands of personnel. 

Many KGB agents were undoubtedly routed into critical jobs 
and even into Air Force counter intelligence, and an unknown 
number of personnel were routed into fields in which they were 
bound to be incompetent, due to the scrambling of or tampering 


with their tests and aptitude scores. At the very minimum, I had 
saved the Air Force many millions—possibly billions—of dollars, 
and probably many lives and aircraft, and for all that, I was cruelly 
and viciously punished. In retrospect, If I had known beforehand 
what would happen to me, I would have walked right on by and let 
the KGB go on its merry, mischievous way. My health will suffer to 
the end of my life for what the Air Force did to me, and I'm lucky 
to be alive. Apparently, no one was thankful for what I did. In fact, 
they were terrified of the truth and what it might do to their future. 
Imagine the Republicans—Vice-President Nixon, President 
Eisenhower, and right-wing General LeMay—reacting to that. They 
wanted no public prosecution or press releases on it, even though it 
was bigger than the Rudolf Abel arrest, the Aldrich Ames arrest, or 
the Richard Hanssen arrest, because the damage involved thousands 
of personnel, all under the administration of General Dwight David 
Eisenhower, himself a military man, whose political career was 
jeopardized by my discovery. The political implications of public 
knowledge would have been devastating. How could Eisenhower 
have let that happen? The best way to describe the incident is 
"POLITICAL EMBARRASSMENT". And I was the unfortunate 
messenger...who was shot. 

Instead of prosecuting the members of the KGB cell, which 
would have attracted public attention, they were transferred to the 
Army, and the incident was classified (to keep the press from finding 
out), but since I had no clearance at the time of my discovery, I was 
not bound by a national security agreement, so they in effect 
persecuted me into oblivion instead. I was transferred to a SAC base 
in Ohio—Lockborne AFB—which was directly under the authority 
of the trusted right-wing head of the Strategic Air Command, 
General Curtis LeMay, where I could be oppressed and controlled. 
There was no interest in doing what was right or just, but rather to 
pursue partisan political expediency, through a criminal conspiracy, 
in service to continued political control by the current Republican 
administration in Washington. 

This was clearly a case of treason, since the Republican Party 


gave "aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States", for 
purely partisan political purposes. 

The indelible imprint the incident had made upon me, has 
been inescapably driven home to me, each and every day and night 
since then, by the symptoms of narcolepsy which I have struggled 
with ever since. Through the first few years, I never came to grips 
with the problem as a disability, because I was in denial. So long as 
I could be involved in dynamic physical activity, in my youth, I was 
able to continue to perform on an acceptable level, by exercising 
extraordinary concentration. Whenever I had to sit in a class for a 
long time, which was somewhat boring, or when I had not had a lot 
of sleep the night before, the problem persisted. For 16 
years—between 1962 and 1978—before I began getting regular 
medication, I drove vehicles which had beds in the back, so I could 
take a nap whenever the narcolepsy hit me while driving. In late 
1977, I first began getting regular medication. 

Back in early March, 1962, I entered training for the U.S. 
Peace Corps, and was sent to Puerto Rico for training. This was the 
site of the second incident involving the CIA and the spooks, in 
which I was booted out of Peace Corps training for what I later 
discovered—over four years later—was the false allegation made by 
the CIA itself, to President John F. Kennedy, that I was one of its 
agents. Again, I as the messenger, was 'shot'. The lie to Kennedy 
appeared to have been related to an incident involving my discovery, 
around April, 1962, that the Russians were installing ICBM silos 
and missiles in Cuba. I had discovered this while in Peace Corps 
training, near Arecibo, Puerto Rico, when I was approached at a 
rural cantina by an old Puerto Rican man. The man explained that 
he had been going back and forth to Cuba in his boat, running a 
small black-marketeering and smuggling operation between Puerto 
Rico and Cuba. He emerged from a nearby pier, approached me, and 
excitedly told me what he had seen in Cuba, as he had crawled up 
in the grass, near an installation near Havana. He described the 
presence of Russian troops, and the large-scale construction of what 
were apparently ICBM silos, complete with missiles, and batteries 


of anti-aircraft surface-to-air ("SAM") missiles, to protect against air 
attacks or U-2 surveillance. The man had then urgently made the 
1200-mile trip in his boat back to Arecibo as fast as he could, in 
order to report this important information. 

I immediately relayed this information to four men and a 
woman whom I knew to be CIA agents, who were in my Peace 
Corps training group, so it could be checked out. I expected a U-2 
flight to be conducted as soon as possible, to get positive photo-
confirmation of this strategic information. History shows this to be 
true, although the version told to the public contains several lies. 

Two of the CIA agents leaked the misinformation that I was a 
CIA agent to Fidel Castro's agents, when they visited the Peace 
Corps training base, followed by Castro's radio broadcasts accusing 
the U.S. of planting its CIA agents in the Peace Corps. This was 
done because the CIA and the Republican party wanted to make a 
shambles out of Kennedy's Peace Corps, which they had already 
infiltrated. After Kennedy had taken the bait, he signed an executive 
edict which stated that no person who had been in the CIA could be 
in the Peace Corps. The CIA, through Kennedy's gullibility, 
scapegoated me and several other innocent parties—none of whom 
were CIA agents—by kicking us out for being "CIA agents", yet 
failing to tell any of us why we were being kicked out. 

Meanwhile, none of the four real agents was kicked out, and 
the CIA illegally maintained its presence in the Peace Corps in 
defiance to Kennedy's edict. Their hatred of Kennedy was 
apparently greater than their respect for the rule of law and the 
constitution under which our republic is supposed to operate. 

Just before my departure from the Peace Corps training facility 
at Barranquitas, Puerto Rico—I was seen off by a sizeable 
contingency of my Puerto Rican friends—who carried placards 
protesting my being thrown out—and with a tearful Hispanic girl 
from Laredo, Texas, in the background, afraid to come forward to 
kiss me goodbye. Meanwhile, the CIA agents had given me a bunch 
of muck on the Peace Corps, which they apparently expected me to 
give to the press on my return to West Texas, where they had 


already arranged for interviews and a TV appearance. 

As later documented, and faithfully reflected in the recent 
movie, "Thirteen Days", the information on the Russian ICBMs did 
not reach the President for at least six more months, and the 
President was also falsely led to believe that the ICBMs—which the 
old man had described to me in April—were not being installed in 
Cuba until late October, 1962. Neither President Kennedy nor the 
movie writers apparently ever knew of this lie. The possible reasons 
the CIA withheld this information from Kennedy for so long are all 
bad: 

(1) The CIA, in its incompetence, may have ignored the 
information I gave them, dismissing it as a rumor, until it because 
so painfully apparent that they couldn't ignore it; or, 
(2) the CIA may have wanted to "cut Kennedy short"....to 
make it a "big surprise", so they could evoke the most extreme 
reaction from Kennedy, possibly even to create a nuclear war. 
In view of the previous discovery I had made in 1956, the 
CIA should have realized that the information I gave them was 
valid, and I'm relatively certain they acted upon it and had U-2 
confirmation on it for six months before they told Kennedy about it, 
and General LeMay made certain Kennedy didn't know about it. 

The other lie—that I was a CIA agent—was not disclosed to 
me until a 1966 meeting with a CIA recruiter at the University of 
Texas at Austin. 

Incredibly, after trying to murder me and causing my 
narcolepsy in 1956, and scapegoating me in 1962, the CIA 
attempted to recruit me in 1966, 1974, 1975, 1977 and 1989, in 
various capacities. Though I have never worked for them, in 1962 
they told President Kennedy that I did. It just goes to show that even 
the President can be lied to with impunity by the CIA. 

It was a turning point...an "epiphany" if you will...for me, 
when I read in October, 1962, that the President had just 
"discovered" the Russian plot to install ICBMs in Cuba, which I had 
discovered and reported to the CIA six months earlier. Meanwhile, 
though I was still in the dark at that time as to why I was kicked out 


of the Peace Corps, I knew that the military and the CIA were 
concealing strategic information from the President, their boss, 
Commander-in-Chief of U.S. armed forces. If the President was 
being denied such critical, national security information, I asked 
myself, how was he supposed to insure our protection? Wasn't that 
treason? Did the generals and spooks care so little for us that they 
were willing to risk our suffering the possible consequences of a 
nuclear holocaust, by denying intelligence to the President until it 
was almost too late to avoid a nuclear war? 

In a Feb. 11, 2001 press interview on the arrest of FBI 
agent/alleged Russian mole Richard Hanssen, President George W. 
Bush said, "I just want everyone out there to know that, if you've 
been false to a trust...if you've betrayed a trust...we're gonna come 
after you." I asked myself, what if the government is false to a trust? 

The government had been false to its trust to me so many 
times...in 1956, by giving me a potentially lethal dose of a 
neurotoxic drug which caused permanent damage, and in 1962 by 
falsely scapegoating me as a "CIA agent", while lying to President 
Kennedy, and by shooting at my wife in 1983 and causing the 
miscarriage of our first child, a girl, and almost causing my wife to 
die. After all that, I view what it says mostly as lies. 

As I see it, the "cloak and dagger" intrigues provide too many 
opportunities for illegal political manipulation, as the tools of the 
evil conspirators who create them. Instead of protecting our national 
security, they endanger it even more. In addition, a climate of hatred 
toward Americans has been created, so that we cannot travel abroad 
without being suspected of working for the spooks. 

After the terrorist attack of September 11, 2001, it became 
obvious that the CIA and FBI are incompetent, that the White 
House gave the Afghani Taliban 43 million dollars only three 
months before, and that the CIA trained Osama bin Laden via the 
Pakistani ISI (intelligence service), probably including the 
techniques of trauma-based mind-control to use on his suicide 
stooges. 


The CIA's UFOlogy Double-Whammy 

I had realized much earlier in life that the CIA (through its 
predecessors) had created both Project Bluebook and the UFOlogy 
field, to conceal UFO propulsion technology from the people. My 
contact with intelligence agencies, aside from confirming my earlier 
suspicions, had done little more than tell me what they were 
supposed to do, and revealed what they had failed to do, when under 
a duty to do so. It taught me to look for the motivations behind the 
various CIA frauds and failures in respect to the American people, 
and many others in the world, who don't deserve such abuse. Since 
I realize that all the major governments of the world possess UFO 
technology, yet keep it secret, such secrecy in the name of "national 
security" is the biggest fraud of all, especially when the technology 
could liberate our citizens from energy slavery. 
We know of government frauds only because of blunders by its 
employees, but such "blunders" can be faked. A prime example of 
a faked government blunder is revealed by the circumstances 
surrounding the Condon Report, in which a government plan to use 
"non-believers" to propagate false propaganda was intentionally 
exposed, due to a feigned "accidental" discovery of a "secret" memo, 
dated Aug. 9, 1966, written by Robert Low, project "coordinator". 
In October, 1966, the Air Force selected Dr. Edward U. 
Condon of the University of Colorado in Boulder to head a 
committee to do an allegedly "objective, scientific study" of the 
UFO phenomenon. Low's "secret" memo was "inadvertently" placed 
into the unclassified "open files folder" under the heading, AIR 
FORCE CONTRACT AND BACKGROUND, so it could be 
"discovered" by a researcher for NICAP, Maj. Donald Kehoe's UFO 
(CIA front) organization. The memo1 stated, in pertinent part 
(emphasis mine), as follows: 

1from Flying Saucer Fiasco, John G. Fuller, LOOK magazine (May 14, 1968). 

131 


"...Our study would be conducted almost exclusively by non-believers 
who, although they couldn't possibly prove a negative result, could and 
probably would add an impressive body of evidence that there is no 
reality to the observations. The trick would be, I think, to describe the 
project so that, to the public, it would appear a totally objective study 
but, to the scientific community, would present the image of a group of 
nonbelievers trying their best to be objective, but having an almost zero 
expectation of finding a saucer. One way to do this would be to stress 
investigation, not of the physical phenomena, hut rather of the people 
who do the observing—the psychology and sociolosy of persons and 
groups who report seeing UFO's. If the emphasis were put here, rather 
than on examination of the old question of the physical reality of the 
saucers, I think the scientific community would quickly get the 
message"... "I'm inclined to feel at this early stage that, if we set up the 
thing right and take pains to get the proper people involved and have 
success in presenting the image we want to present to the scientific 
community, we could carry the job off to our benefit..." 

This memo, contrary to the false idea being created—that it 
was a "smoking gun"—was actually a cheap "throw-away", 
"Saturday-night special", being thrown into the scene of the crime 
to be later discovered by "investigators". 

Dr. Condon was a "highly-credentialed" figurehead, used to 
add false credibility, while Low was probably the CIA point-man, 
since his memo was dated two months before Condon's selection. 
For maximum effect, it was made to appear painfully clear from the 
memo that the purpose of the committee was to create the false 
illusion of scientific objectivity, and to convince the public of the 
"non-existence" of UFOs. 

Therefore, the rationale for the alleged study was to make it 
appear to be focused on the personal psychology and sociological 
aspects of witnesses and UFO groups, to inflame their indignation, 
while conspicuously avoiding the physical reality of UFOs or the 
technology observed by witnesses. This was similar to Project 
Bluebook, which was to ostensibly pose as the official depository of 


the public's UFO sightings and photos, in order to "study" and 
"understand" the UFO "phenomenon", but having as its ulterior 
purpose the collection and concealment of objective reports by 
rational witnesses, and photographs which revealed the 
government's classified UFOs. 

Posing as the "scientific investigators", the government 
hucksters of Project Bluebook were red herrings actually set up to 
intercept data from the uncontrolled publics' observations regarding 
secret UFO technology. In other words, to catch the inevitable leaks. 

Meanwhile, the huckters of the Condon Committee were 
conspicuously set up as red herrings, to fabricate the false 
appearance of a "government cover-up of government-alien 
contact". It skirted the issue of technology which might appear to 
some to prove the existence of "alien" UFOs, and changed the focus 
from technological to psychological and sociological. Then, by 
letting all this be known to the general public and UFOlogy dupes 
through the NICAP group...including the idea that the Condon 
Committee intended to cast the pall of neurosis, insanity or fraud 
upon all rational witnesses...who had been suckered into believing 
that, by filing their reports with Project Bluebook, that "our 
government" might be able to "figure out what UFOs are", only 
added to the induced paranoia of the UFOlogy dupes. 

The fact that they designed this program to misinterpret 
sightings and witnesses, shows that they already knew everything 
about UFOs, especially since Project Bluebook was shut down in 
1969. Shortly before that time, UFOs were sighted taking off from 
a military airport in the Ukraine, by American scientists, as they 
rode by in a train while on their way to a scientific conference in 
Kazakhstan. That no longer left any doubt that the Soviets also had 
the technology. 

Consequently, four of the first five members selected for the 
Condon Committee were psychologists, while coordinator Robert 
Low had an M.B.A., with a B.S. in electrical engineering. 

On Oct. 8, 1966, Condon was quoted by the New York Times 
as saying, "...It is improbable they (UFOs) exist..."... "...The view 


that UFOs are hallucinatory will be a subject of our investigation, to 
discover what it is that makes people imagine they see things." This 
statement, true to Low's memo of two months earlier, was intended 
to play into NICAP's agenda, and was published in the New York 
Times so it would reach the most people. 

The Condon Committee and Maj. Donald Kehoe's NICAP 
organization represented two government "prongs" which are 
discussed later in more detail. Meanwhile, by its exclusive, official 
control over the gathering and concealment of rational UFO reports, 
Project Bluebook, headed by J. Allen Hynek, served both of these 
"prongs", by denial of information regarding rational reports to the 
public—thus supporting the government's irrational denials—while 
creating a vacuum of information which UFOlogy groups could fill 
with the begged question of an "alien presence". 

NICAP and the Condon Committee's conduct was designed 
to create a dramatic conflict intended to polarize and divide the 
public between one or the other prong, leaving absolutely no "Most 
Rational Alternative" in the "middle"...the arena of logic and 
reason. 

It was a nice touch to have a member of Kehoe's group 
'discover' the allegedly misplaced "secret" memo, which was 
intended to expose the government's "official" agenda of 
manipulating the public. This was so the UFOlogists could scream 
"Censorship!" and was intended to add false credibility to the idea 
of a "...cover-up of a government-alien liaison." "Major" Donald 
Kehoe's military credentials added enhanced credibility to he and his 
group of counter-huckters: The Quixotic "fighting marine", leading 
his platoon in a battle against insurmountable government secrecy 
concealing "alien" visits. 

Kehoe was associated with J. Allen Hynek through something 
called "Project Lure"2, which was allegedly created to "lure" aliens 
into approaching certain sites prepared by them, to establish human 
contact with the "aliens", but the real object of this scam was to 

2Major Donald E. Kehoe, Aliens from Space...The Real Story of Unidentified Flying Objects 
(1973). 


sucker that segment of the interested public which did not agree 
with the government's pseudo-skeptical denials, into believing that 
aliens were actually visiting earth. This also showed that Hynek and 
Air Force Intelligence were definitely involved in spreading the 
begged question of alien visitations. 

The closure of Project Bluebook in 1969 represented a shift in 
government strategy, probably resulting from the fact that Bluebook 
would no longer deter the intelligence interests of Russia, which 
clearly had the technology by that time. From that point on, the only 
remaining "enemy" was the public. 

It is revealing to compare the prior agenda of Air Force 
contractors as stated in the leaked Low memo--to deflect the gist of 
the investigation from physical reality to psychological causes or 
aberrations--to statements by French UFOlogist, Jacques Vallee, in 
Passport to Magonia (1969), in which he built upon the Swiss 
psychologist C.G. Jung's "collective unconscious"/"archetypal 
images"/Tarot card hypothesis, to depict UFOs as a "sociological 
phenomenon"...."...manifestations of the collective unconscious" 
(an theory on which Jung himself had already reversed his position 
in respect to UFOs, as disclosed by a newspaper interview given by 
him while visiting Alamogordo, New Mexico). 

We can see that the agenda of the CIA/OSI UFOlogists had 
been boosted by Robert Low's "secret" memo—which had so 
conspicuously fallen into the public's hands through NICAP (as if 
the government couldn't have retrieved it)—which laid out the 
"official prong" parameters under which the Air Force and CIA 
required the Condon Committee to operate. Meanwhile, it can be 
seen that Vallee's work coincided with the "unofficial prong" 
parameters represented by UFOlogy and NICAP, except a little 
more toward the middle. Whether by coincidence or intent, the 
effect was the same as if he were operating under the OSI agenda. 

Since my 1993 first edition of Space Aliens From the Pentagon 
was published, there have even been a few in the UFO community 
who have accused me of being a "CIA agent". I can only laugh at 
this, and my own mild irritation, since, according to my own analysis 


of the UFO situation—extending for over 50 years—I should 
therefore be trying to convince you that UFOs are extraterrestrial in 
origin, or natural or paranormal phenomena, as covert CIA 
UFOlogists do, or espousing the "alien lizard-people" "party line". 
Instead, I'm exposing technology that our government conceals on 
behalf of the powers that be, to protect its cozy partnership with the 
powerful economic interests. As Hitler said, "One hand washes the 
other." 

My lifelong research shows that UFOs are exclusively man-made 
electric flying machines, invented by Nikola Tesla before 1900. I 
don't expect anyone who has their head screwed on straight to 
believe that I am a CIA agent, even though President Kennedy was 
finally convinced it was true. This was after he questioned the CIA's 
veracity, by sending his brother-in-law, R. Sargent Shriver, to spend 
a few days hanging around with me in Puerto Rico, to try to 
determine whether or not the CIA was lying to him about me. 
Hindsight now shows that he should have heeded those suspicions, 
and rejected the CIA lies. 

I do not think that I can sue for libel, slander or defamation for 
being called a CIA agent, and it is doubtful that the government's 
judges would consider such an accusation damaging or defamatory. 
Anyone foolish enough to believe I am a CIA agent, after reading 
my books, is tragically pathetic, laughable and stupid. 

Even if a person is not a "card-carrying" member of the CIA, 
if that person does the CIA's covert work for it, by spreading what 
I call the "pseudo-skeptic" or "pseudo-paranormalist" party line, 
they are just as much an agent as if they are on the payroll. You 
could think of them as the "CIA Auxiliary". By "covert work", I 
mean someone who surreptitiously does the CIA's work, but 
conceals or denies employment by, or association with, the CIA. 
This does not apply to me, since, as a concerned citizen, I only 
reported what I knew to be strategic information, which had 
inadvertently fallen into my lap. Nothing I ever did in this respect 
was "for the government", only "for the people", and I was never 
paid a red cent for it. 


On the other hand, if a CIA employee were to sabotage the 
work of the CIA, they could be subject to prosecution for sabotaging 
their "mission". As such, if I were a CIA employee, I could be 
accused of sabotaging the CIA's UFOlogy M.O., by publishing my 
books, but as a civilian, I am not subject to prosecution, only 
harassment and suppression, sometimes through lawsuits or threats 
of lawsuits, as well as interference with the distribution of my books, 
with my speaking engagements, and my radio interviews. 

For example, on Feb. 19, 2001, I received a call from Art Bell, 
requesting a telephone interview, which he scheduled for Feb. 20, 
at 3:00 P.M. On Feb. 20, at 3:00 P.M., the phone service for the 
entire village of Lamy, New Mexico (where I live) was turned off at 
the main switchboard in Santa Fe. The service remained off until 
Feb. 21, 1:00 A.M., after Bell's night-time broadcast had begun, too 
late for me to call. The outage was reported on Feb. 20, but no work 
crew was dispatched, because the phone company knew that nothing 
was broken and that the government had turned off the service. 

A phone company representative called the following morning, 
and acknowledged that the service had been interrupted at the main 
switchboard. When I asserted that I thought the FBI had done it, he 
stated, "I am prohibited from expressing an opinion on that matter." 
That, in effect, confirmed my allegation, since it showed that a 
secrecy order was in effect, which the phone company employee was 
required to obey, probably under the delusion that he was some sort 
of "patriot". 
Vacillating Vallee 

In the 1995 second edition of Space Aliens From the Pentagon, 
I stated that my two "Roswell" photos--one of which showed rhesus 
monkeys in G-Suits--were "...among the other things taken by a 
woman who (allegedly) associated...""... and who had also lived with 
the French 'UFOlogist', Jacques Vallee, for two years." Vallee has 
disputed this woman's statements, so I have retracted them, and now 
apologize for them, since it is her word against Vallee's. Vallee (if 
the woman was speaking of the same Jacques Vallee, as there is 


more than one), did not deserve the possible inferences which a 
reader might derive from reading Pentagon Aliens. I did not mean to 
imply that Vallee was an employee of the CIA or that he had a hand 
in stealing my photos. What Vallee deserves is a more in-depth 
analysis and critique, in the light of my "CIA M.O." criteria. None 
of Vallee's personal life is any of my business, but I continue to 
assert that everything I have said about his work, which is subject to 
fair criticism, is true to the best of my knowledge. 

Sometimes Vallee talks like he wants to be a skeptic, a la Philip 
Klass, and sometimes he talks like he believes in aliens or strange 
beings or forces, and sometimes he even mentions "advanced secret 
government aircraft", but in my books, if someone parrots the 
paranormal party line, I object, and it doesn't matter whatever else 
they may pay lip service to. 

In reviewing some of Jacques Vallee's UFOlogy statements 
through the years, it is obvious that he appears to vacillate between 
the two sides of what I call the CIA's "two-pronged attack" (pseudo- 
skeptical government denial, and UFOlogical paranormalism, 
respectively). These two "prongs" were designed to trap and crush 
reason—what I call the third, "Most Rational Alternative" 
("MRA")—in the middle, the assertion that UFOs are exclusively 
man-made, and that there are no aliens present on earth. My 
additional assertion—supported by objective evidence and my own 
personal experiences—is that the CIA initially created and presently 
controls both sides of the debate—the two "prongs"—as well as the 
entire field of UFOlogy. The CIA seeks to control the "middle", 
anticipating the problems represented by my argument when it 
designed the program—in fact, the "why" for its creation of the 
program. Its total control of the field through its covert, paranormal- 
UFOlogists, and the conspicuous absence of my argument, prove 
this. 

Vallee apparently tries to "occupy" the middle also, but doesn't 
belong there, because, instead of representing it as the arena of logic 
and reason which it naturally should be, as I do, he apparently 
depicts it--by his actions and statements—as an arena of vacillation, 


in which confused or indecisive individuals are led to believe that 
the only option is a choice between the two irrational "prongs", as 
if the "MRA" does not even exist. Vallee is really a part of the 
paranormal prong, despite his attempts (sometimes) to separate 
himself from that designation. Logic is logic, and it can't be dodged 
even by evasiveness with oneself or others. 

In early 2001, just after the announcement that I was to appear 
as a speaker in Santa Clara, California, at a two-day event entitled 
"Conspiracy.Con", I received a letter from David Alexander, an 
attorney representing Jacques Vallee, threatening to sue me for libel 
and defamation, for the statements I purportedly made about Vallee 
in Pentagon Aliens (third, renamed 1999 ed. of Space Aliens From 
the Pentagon). I had mentioned the name "Vallee" twice in the same 
context, and once in the index, so, without admitting guilt, I deleted 
the name, thereby mooting any claim. I also considered that, 
whatever important things I have to say can be concluded by anyone 
who reads and understands my books, without reference to a specific 
name, so it really isn't essential to mention any UFOlogist in a 
specific context, though it is often helpful. 

Since the purpose of my book is to teach my method of analysis 
and understanding to my readers, so they can analyze UFOlogy for 
themselves, why not delete a name? After all, why should I allow the 
threat of a lawsuit to jeopardize my book? I therefore decided to 
write this chapter, to make myself clearer and to pursue particular 
issues more succinctly and in greater depth and detail, in regard to 
the work of Vallee and some others of that genre. I needed a more 
thorough treatment, in order to do justice to the public's needs. 

I instinctively consider such threats to sue as attempts by the 
CIA to shut me up, since that type of strategy was used on me 
before, in relation to my energy R & D. Since it's possible that a 
court might conclude that I have overstepped certain boundaries, 
and that I might be hard put to justify what I said, I have retracted 
those particular statements in regard to Vallee, and will restate my 
accusation that the theft of my photos (and other things) was made 
on behalf of the CIA's Office of Scientific Intelligence, because they 


were a "smoking gun" on the Roswell hoax, and leave it at that. 

Vallee is a "public personality" and former public servant. I 
have never been a "public servant" as he was, when he was 
employed in Project Bluebook and perhaps some other government 
positions. Probably more than anyone else, Vallee established the 
"party line" of UFOlogical paranormalism (though he calls his 
theories "paraphysical", they are still a minor variant of 
"paranormal"). 

It would not only be an unreasonable violation of First 
Amendment rights, but also quite unrealistic to expect a court to 
grant Vallee a "King's X", giving him "royal immunity" and 
prohibiting anyone from mentioning, discussing or criticizing his 
ideas, since he has chosen to stick himself into the spotlight of 
scrutiny, and to continue to put in his "two cents" as the debate rolls 
along. If he can't stand the heat, he will have to disappear from the 
kitchen, perhaps in a similar way as his witness claimed the USS 
Eldridge disappeared (as you will read about below). Since he has 
made himself rather unavoidable, I decided to devote some time and 
energy to this chapter, to show what kinds of reactions I had to 
Vallee many years ago, as well as today. 

By recently demanding my attention to his activities, through 
his threat to sue me—and to have all my books recalled and 
destroyed—Vallee has induced me to focus on his past, to get a 
more complete idea of what his work has been all about. 

It appears to me to be Vallee's self-appointed "job"—or maybe 
it's just his personal quirk—to play the devil's advocate, a position 
which tends to keep the resolution of UFO/alien issues unresolved, 
the way he apparently likes it... hazy, nebulous, paranormal, and 
irrational...occasionally venturing forth to attack and "debunk" 
those with rational explanations for allegedly paranormal incidents, 
which leaves standing what I consider to be the irrational, CIA 
UFOlogical paranormalist status quo. He uses what I call "pseudo- 
skeptical" arguments against those who may offer realistic answers 
to paranormal-interpreted events, and as such, ambivalently appears 
to be a supporter of both the irrational official denials and of the 


paranormal phenomena...and of the CIA's M.O., by default. 

Vallee's conduct is consistent with the government's plan to 
control both sides of the debate, through its two-pronged attack, 
which means that the spooks and the government will promote his 
work, as well as some in the movie industry (i.e., Steven Spielberg's 
Close Encounters of the Third Kind). These two prongs are two sides 
of the same coin, since both the denial of the existence of UFOs, 
and the assertion of the presence of "alien" UFOs, are equally 
irrational and "paranormal"...a position which I consider to be 
dishonest...since many thousands of responsible, experienced aircraft 
observers with certifiable 20-20 eyesight—including myself— have 
seen them. Vallee appears to police the "middle", which has the 
effect of clearing out anyone offering rationality to the situation; get 
rid of the rational, leaving the irrational, so the two-pronged system 
will continue to work. 

Whether or not this conduct by Vallee is by design or by 
statistically-challenging coincidence, is a matter of personal 
judgment, but I do think his work definitely coincides with the 
CIA's covert program. If Vallee has given this effect unconsciously, 
he has my sincere pity. If anyone thinks threats to sue will "clear me 
out", they have another think coming. 

I have no personal animosity toward Vallee, and If I knew him 
personally, I would probably like him, as he appears to be a very 
intelligent, glib and charming person, with creativity and a writer's 
gift. My beef with him has to do with the ideas which he has spread 
in the past, which I think are damaging to the scientific 
understanding of UFOs, as well as to the rationality of the people 
who swallow his theories. Granted, those who believe what he says 
are already gullible, but I don't believe it is ethical to feed 
paranormal pulp to those who are gullible, and I will do whatever I 
can to convince them of what I believe to be the Most Rational 
Alternative. 

I will argue against paranormal theories until hell freezes over, 
so to speak, and no one will stop me so long as I am breathing. I 
believe that the technology being concealed is important for the 


natural progress of the human race, and that the paranormal 
theories serve the purpose of suppressing it, as well as in preparing 
the public mind for acceptance of far more dangerous mass- 
psychology Big Lies. 

Superficially, Vallee's approach may appear to be rational to 
gullible people, until you look at his weird punch-lines, and tally up 
the numerous important things he has conspicuously seemed to 
avoid, ignore, or even appears to conceal. For example, the following 
article, with the title, Jacques Vallee Hoaxed Science & UFO 
Community With His "Anatomy!" UFO Sweden, sheds some light on 
Vallee's M.O. with respect to other paranormalists, when operating 
in what I call the "Pseudo-Skeptic" mode: 

Vallee and the Fraud Business 

The controversy I discuss here was initially kicked up by 
various writers and alleged witnesses, surrounding the alleged 
"Philadelphia Experiment". I take no position on this alleged 
experiment—which I have no way of knowing actually occurred, 
and apparently neither does anyone else—since all information 
appears to be hearsay. But I do know that many frauds have been 
associated with the government's covert program to promulgate false 
stories surrounding it. I offer this information to show Vallee's 
involvement, according to a paper which I found on the Internet3. 
The Navy most certainly conducted some experiments related 
to German WW II submarine warfare, and in fact, also conducted 
some research related to German WW I submarine warfare, 
intended to develop and test technology to avoid German torpedoes, 
and for American sub-chasers to find German U-boats—such as 
sonar—so they could be sunk with depth charges. The idea that any 
so-called "invisibility" experiments were related to making American 
ships invisible to radar, or invisible to German magnetic torpedo 
sensors, seems more credible, and such technology was developed 

3TRUE.X-FILES.NEWS, An Internet News Service/true.x-fiIe.netw@2news.com, found by me on Jan. 11, 2001. 

142



for our ships and submarines, but neither of these experiments or 
tests appears to have been competently proven insofar as the place 
and time they were performed, specifically linked to the alleged 
Philadelphia scenario. 

In Jacques Vallee's Anatomy of a Fraud paper4, according to 
the article published on the Internet, he accused researchers who 
had asserted that the Philadelphia Experiment was one to make the 

U.S.S. Eldridge invisible to radar, rather than invisible to the 
eye—of fraud. 
Vallee based this rather rash allegation on the idea that the 
Germans did not have radar in 1943, ignoring the probability that 
the Navy might have done such an experiment in anticipation of the 
time when the Germans would develop radar, had it not been for the 
documented fact—available to Vallee via Navy documents—that the 
Germans did have radar in 1941- This was two years prior to the 
alleged experiment, though there is no proof that they had outfitted 
their subs with it by 1943. In any case, this was not an essential 
element to the Navy's possible tests. Ironically, I entertained the 
"invisibility-to-radar" postulate in Pentagon Aliens, and Vallee is 
reported to have suggested the same possibility. Was this before or 
after he read my book? 

The absence of German radar would have been a slim enough 
basis for alleging "fraud", even if true, and a rather drastic and 
defamatory allegation under the circumstances, yet what is at stake 
if a reasonable explanation for the alleged "Philadelphia 
Experiment" is allowed to prevail? It would discredit the obviously 
phony paranormal and ridiculous tale about the experiment being an 
attempt to make the Eldridge invisible to the eye, but which went 
wrong, causing the ship and its crew to get caught up in a so-called 
"space'time warp", resulting in its being transported to another time 
and place; or, the story about it becoming invisible to the eye. 

By attacking the reasonable explanation—a radar/stealth 
experiment—Vallee's attack had the effect of supporting the 

Jacques Vallee, Anatomy of a Fraud, Journal of Scientific Exploration, Editor-in-Chief Bernard Haisch. 

143 


irrational "disappearing ship" garbage, by default, as well as to 
support his own weird "paraphysical" theories5. 

In his attack on the reasonable explanation, it appeared that 
Vallee attempted to show that the proponents of the alternate theory 
had concealed their presumed knowledge of appropriate Navy 
documents which allegedly showed that the Germans had no 
operational radar in 1943. By his same standard, Vallee was also 
presumed to be aware of the Navy documents which proved that 
what he and his witness said was wrong, and put most or all of what 
they said into question. 

After ValleVs paper was published, allegedly to "debunk" the 
alternate theory, "Special Civilian Investigator" Marshall Barnes 
responded, saying that Vallee had a presumed knowledge of Navy 
documents which proved that the Germans in fact had radar in 
1941, two years before the alleged experiment. While this did not 
prove that the Germans had radar on their subs, the Navy would 
have been very short-sighted not to assume that the Germans soon 
would install radar on their subs, and would most likely have been 
held to blame for a failure to conduct experiments which might 
avoid the loss of several ships and many lives, a result which, if 
ameliorated by productive experiments, could more than pay for 
experiments which might have helped to develop appropriate new 
technology. 

In his initial paper, Vallee’s alleged "eye-witness", Edward 
Dudgeon, said he was present at the stated time, and that the 
Philadelphia experiment, per se, "never occurred", but added that 
the ship did in fact become invisible to the eye, due to the effects of 
"St. Elmo's fire". After the initial version of his paper was written, 
Vallee edited a portion of Dudgeon's statements out, to delete his 
comment regarding the actual optical invisibility of the ship due to 
St. Elmo's fire. The apparent reason Vallee did so, is that the 
allegation was so irrational that it tended to impeach the credibility 
of his own, so-called eye-witness. Such a deletion might be 

5Parascope, Inc. (1996) 

144 


considered to be a fraudulent concealment in a court, by tbe way, if 
it was considered to be a "material" omission, but Barnes made no 
issue on it except to paranormally say tbat Vallee's omission was due 
to the Navy's classifying the use of St. Elmo's fire as a secret 
technology to make ships invisible to the eye! 

In addition to showing the German possession of radar in 1941, 
Naval documents also proved, when compared to statements, dates 
and documents purportedly produced by Dudgeon, and contained in 
Vallee's paper, that Dudgeon was lying, and couldn't have been 
there or have witnessed the events he claimed to, at the time. Or so 
Barnes asserted. Big deal. 

After being confronted with the evidence, Barnes asserted that 
Vallee did not retract his article, and by his subsequent conduct 
continued to promulgate his "debunking" paper, by his failure to 
disapprove of his witness's alleged fraud. Has Vallee become so old 
and inflexible as to be incapable of admitting he made an error, even 
when faced with the undisputed accusation of fraud? Did he publish 
his paper with the intent of promulgating fraudulent research, as 
alleged by Barnes, based on presumed knowledge of the naval 
documents referred to by both Vallee and Barnes, or did Barnes also 
promulgate a fraud by continuing to allege an "anti-radar" 
experiment which also was not proven by the evidence? 

The answer, in the final analysis, is that we should not allow 
ourselves to be taken in by this alleged "argument"...between two 
proponents of the same paranormalist ilk...which has the effect of 
making them appear to be on opposing sides, when in fact, they both 
promote the same things, while projecting each other's "careers" 
into the public eye, through a meaningless "argument". 

These labyrinthine arguments and controversies appear to me 
to have been intentionally created as red herrings for the purpose of 
pursuing the strategic objectives desired by the Occult Scientific 
Thought Control Dictatorship, by creating endless mazes and eddy 
currents of meaningless chatter which absorb and dissipate the 
energies of those who seek answers to obviously more important 
questions, the answers to which have been classified. 


Vallee and the Secrecy Business 

Vallee was a close associate of Dr. J. Allen Hynek in his work 
for Project Bluebook, the Air Force/OSI project created allegedly to 
investigate the so-called "UFO phenomenon". My documentation 
shows that the Nazis came into possession of Tesla's UFO 
technology and did initial experimentation at Los Alamos, New 
Mexico, in 1934-38, prior to taking the technology to Germany. The 

U.S. came into possession of the German projects in 1945, under 
Operation Paperclip. 
Documentation shows that Project Bluebook was initially 
created on contract for the U.S. Army Air Force Counter-
intelligence Corps ("C.I.C") at Wright-Patterson AFB Ohio, 
beginning during WW II, by Charles Hundley and Edgar Cayce. 
Cayce was employed there ostensibly as a "technical writer". 
Hundley was associated with the O.N.I., having taught Russian to 
American Naval Intelligence officers. The project later fell under the 
jurisdiction of the Air Force Office of Special Investigation ("OSI"), 
but was covertly organized under the CIA's Office of Scientific 
Intelligence (A.K.A. "OSI", confusion intentional). 

The last time I heard from Hundley, around 1961, he was 
teaching maritime law at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy at 
Carlsbad, California. Hundley had also been associated with the 
Ohio State University astronomy department, and said he was also 
associated with Jacques Vallee, due to the Bluebook connection. In 
spite of his "high credentials", Hundley made many paranormal 
claims, such as, "...being abducted by Venusians and taken to Venus 
and back in a flying saucer." Since I could write a small book about 
all this, I won't digress further here. His reasons for making such 
claims should be obvious to those who read my book, especially in 
view of his intelligence background. 

An alleged CIA source told Timothy Good (as reported in his 
book, Above Top Secret, 1988) that in 1955, the leaders of the secret 
services of the USSR, USA, France and Britain met at Geneva and 
unanimously agreed to a policy of secrecy on the "UFO problem" as 


far as the public was concerned. Good also said that Vallee told him 
in 1986 that in 1966, he was sent to the International Congress of 
Mathematics in Moscow, and managed to discuss the subject of 
UFOs with several Soviet scientists. Good also stated that an 
unevaluated CIA report, dated 18 Aug. 1967 (a few months after 
Vallee's trip), with the subject heading , "Report on Conversations 
with Soviet Scientists on Subject of Unidentified Flying Objects in 
the USSR", had the name of the CIA (or CIA'Sponsored) scientist 
who conducted the interview, along with the names of the Soviet 
scientists, deleted, together with the date(s) of the interviews. 

From this sequence of events, it is reasonable to suspect that 
Vallee or any other scientist accompanying him, might have been 
the "CIA or CIA-sponsored" scientist who conducted the 1966 
interviews mentioned in the 1967 report. 

The ultimate purpose of U.S. UFOlogical forays into Russia 
in ca. 1966 appeared to have been to monitor Russian government 
compliance with its agreement to keep its UFO reports secret, under 
the 1955 Geneva agreement. It is also interesting to note here that 
there has been a conspicuous absence of any claim by any 
government that the utterance of a paranormal claim is a security 
breach, so these claims can be presumed to be both unclassified and 
untrue. 

Since it is illegal under our constitution for an American 
citizen to negotiate directly with or to serve a foreign government 
without executive authority, especially its military or its scientists, 
and especially when that government is considered hostile to the 

U.S. at the time, we should suspect that ValleVs work on the 
Russian trip was authorized by the national security apparatus of the 
U.S. government. It would probably also require Vallee to disclose 
to them the context of all his contacts with Soviet scientists after his 
return, just as Los Alamos National Laboratory required of its 
employee, scientist Wen Ho Lee, on his return to the U.S. from a 
similar mathematics conference in Communist China, as disclosed 
during the prosecution of Lee in 1999-2000. Good's "unevaluated" 
1967 CIA report matches these criteria closely. The names of the 

U.S. UFOlogist/scientist and the Soviet scientists he engaged in 
UFO discussions were deleted, making it an intelligence matter. 
So we had Vallee, who probably had a government security 
clearance to authorize his access to all the secret UFO reports of 
Project Bluebook, and government security authorization for travel 
to an enemy country, going to Russia ostensibly for a "mathematics 
conference". Since the official policy of the U.S. government toward 
UFO reports is secrecy, we can assume that Vallee's discussions of 
UFOs with Soviet scientists was of an authorized, "government-to- 
government" nature. It can also be presumed that the "un-secret" 
("public") reports of Project Bluebook, and of its former employee, 
Vallee, are all suspect, either completely concocted by the CIA/OSI, 
to maintain secrecy through misinformation, or carefully selected 
reports which favor a hazy, nondescript, "middle" paranormalist 
interpretation. 

The ambiguous interpretations advocated by Vallee, have the 
effect of dumbing down the public, and of supporting the official 
denials of CSICOP and Phillip Klass, on the one hand, or the 
paranormal interpretations of Vallee on the other—or of supporting 
the similarly outrageous "space alien" claims of the slightly more 
extreme lunatic fringe—allowing them to prevail among various 
segments of the population. Naturally, the total effect of all these 
"fuzzy" effects is a sort of factual mud. Was Vallee's work promoted 
by the CIA through its contacts in the media and publishing, 
because his theories favored its two-pronged strategy? Was Vallee 
fed misinformation to excite a tendency toward paranormalism, or 
was that his own idea, after being shown the non-paranormal facts? 

We know that Vallee, as a Bluebook functionary, was party to 
keeping UFO sighting reports secret. We also know that he had 
access to that secret data, so he had to have a clearance. In order to 
have access, he had to have a "need to know". Why would a mere 
civilian have a "need to know" secrets the rest of us have no access 
to? He also may have had discretion in deciding which reports could 
be made public, if any, and in fact, would have to know where to 
draw the line on what he himself could disclose, without violating 


the national security oath he took when his clearance was granted. 
Vallee and his wife, Janine, compiled the first allegedly 
"comprehensive" database on UFO sightings, a database we can't 
trust, because it emphasized the paranormalist interpretation, and 
excluded the Most Rational Alternative, by what it included and 
excluded, whether true or untrue. 

We mere civilians don't have access to the massive data 
collected by Bluebook, but Vallee does. Most of us don't know what 
has been concealed, but Vallee should. He cannot tell us what he is 
forbidden to tell us, so everything he tells us can be presumed to be 
of no "strategic value", and follows the security establishment 
guidelines designed by the OSI committees, which apply to him 
whether he likes it or not. Otherwise, he would have been 
prosecuted. Knowing what he knows, he must constantly have a 
"brake" on what he says, and may have to seek approval from the 
OSI prior to publication of anything. That means that his former 
boss Hynek, the Air Force, the OSI, the 'other' OSI, and the CIA, 
all had some say about what has been kept secret, and why. 

We know that under the national security rules, NOTHING 
was intentionally disclosed in those Bluebook releases to the public 
which was of a classified, "national security" nature. Vallee cannot 
tell us what he may know, because the government won't let him, 
and we don't know that he would tell us even if he could. 
Ultimately, he tells us only what the government will let him tell us, 
unless what he wants to tell us just happens to be what they want 
him to tell us, but I find that to be a statistically-challenging 
coincidence. The CIA can't tell us what Vallee tells us, because that 
would be patently irrational, and it would be held accountable. 
Vallee's material easily passes all security tests. 

We can assume that all of the Bluebook reports for public 
scrutiny are immaterial or false, since the "real" reports are 
classified, so the publicly disclosed reports were all created or chosen 
by the OSI to confuse the public, to conceal what it alleges to be 
"national security secrets". Given the mission of the national 
security establishment, operating under the same rules as Air Force 


Intelligence, Project Bluebook was forbidden to publish a single 
photograph in their possession, taken by a civilian or military 
photographer, of any government aircraft which was of a classified 
nature. This basically discounts every single photograph of an 
alleged "UFO" made available to the public via Bluebook. They 
certainly never published the clear photos made by my boyhood 
friend, Ken. 

Until and unless you personally observe something alleged to 
be "fantastic", you have to consider it hearsay. This is especially true 
where the alleged event or thing is a known government secret, and 
the information comes from a government source. 

Everything that Vallee says in regard to alleged "aliens" or 
UFOs, is entirely consistent with my analysis. So what does he say? 

Vallee says he thinks UFOs are the "modern manifestation of 
an age-old phenomenon", generally what he calls the "paraphysical 
theory of UFO origins" (Parascope,Inc, 1996). This theory includes 
the time-travel hypothesis—UFOs as time machines from our own 
future—and the angel/demon theory—UFOs as God's angels or 
Satan's demons—taken to be "visitors from space". I had to laugh 
when I heard the Satan's demons hypothesis; imagine, Satan having 
his own little air force, and God too! In Forbidden Science, Vallee 
stated that UFOs are probably "...windows to other dimensions...", 
"...manipulated by intelligent, often mischievous, always enigmatic 
beings we have yet to understand" (60 Greatest Conspiracies of All 
Time). 

Philip Klass, CIA man and CSICOP director, whom I call the 
government's lead "pseudo-debunker", calls Vallee "...one of the 
more distinguished members of the pro-UFO community"...."one of 
the brighter physical scientists who believes in UFOs" (Heretics 
Among Heretics", 60 Greatest Conspiracies of All Time, interview). 
So here Vallee is praised by the arch pseudo-debunker himself. 

Vallee believes that "...the intelligence guiding UFOs is a kind 
of control mechanism, an invisible hand shaping the development of 
human consciousness over a period of eons.." (60 GCAT). He tried 
to cover his rear by acknowledging that governments "..sometimes 


manipulate public opinion through UFO mythology, sometimes 
constructing elaborate hoaxes for propagandistic purposes." This 
could be said of him, couldn't it? This sounds like a quote from my 
books. If Vallee sincerely believes this, why hasn't he written about 
it more? 

Vallee says "...we don't know" where UFOs come from, that 
they are possibly a "...natural phenomenon", or "...an undiscovered 
form or energy in the atmosphere..", possibly "artificial", and if so, 
"...it could come from another form of consciousness, which may or 
may not be extraterrestrial." 

In other words, Vallee wants it a multiplicity of ways, except 
as a real, man-made flying machine powered by electricity. Fuzzy, so- 
called "declassified" or "unclassified" photos are chosen to support 
this theory, because they are hazy, nebulous, and vague, nothing like 
the saucer I saw on a clear, end-of-summer day, from about 300 feet, 
in 1953, and nothing like the photos and negatives the OSI 
purchased from my boyhood friend. 

Incidentally, photos of real saucers may appear to be hazy, 
because of their rapid precession during certain flight modes, as I 
describe in Pentagon Aliens. This is especially the case where the 
lens or film speed is too slow to catch the image in a "still" photo. 

One of the first statements I make in Pentagon Aliens, is: 

"Have neither an open nor closed mind, but rather a self- 
controlled mind, which weighs facts, accepts truth and knowledge, and 
filters out lies and trash." 

This reflects my disgust with such bromides as the one I saw 
on a bumper sticker: "Minds are like parachutes; they only work 
when open." The same thing applies to a toilet, but a toilet is for the 
disposal of human excrement, not an input port for valuable 
knowledge. The mind is a delicate instrument. Downloading 
someone's mental excrement could turn your mind into a mental 
toilet, so you would be a good little consumer and unquestioningly 
do what Big Brother says. 


Vallee is a proponent of what I consider to be a rather 
indiscriminate "open-mindedness", maybe as a result of too much 
Sartre or Camus. As a supposed computer expert, what he advocates 
is tantamount to a computer with no virus protections. In my 
opinion, if you accept and "download" his kind of ideas, it could do 
to your mind something similar to what a virus does to a computer. 
That is just my opinion, based on my own analysis, so you may apply 
my standard, and decide for yourself, or if you wish, you can accept 
everything Vallee says, and reject everything I say. In the end, it is 
up to you. 

The exasperating thing about the term "UFO" is that it creates 
the opportunity for the government's "catch-22". Since the term 
refers to "Unidentified Flying Objects", it can always permit the 
plausible denial of the existence of an "unidentified" object. If the 
government provides a photo of an alleged "unidentified flying 
object", no one can say it has committed a fraud, so long as it cannot 
be proven what the object is, or that the government fabricated it 
with the prior knowledge of what the object is. 

Since the government knows that there are no aliens on planet 
Earth...just as I say...it can always plausibly deny the existence of 
"alien UFOs", or a "government cover-up of alien UFOs", but 
cannot plausibly deny the existence of "exclusively man-made, 
electrodynamic flying craft...thought by the public to be alien 
UFOs". That is the reason that—of all the questions put to the 
government by so-called "UFO lawyers", in frivolous FOIA 
lawsuits—that this question is always excluded, and that is the way 
that you can know that the lawsuits are filed by the CIA. The 
questions are always designed by the OSI, to beg the question that 
UFOs are extraterrestrial—which is also a lie—so that their covert 
UFOlogists can ask them, and their official spokesmen can answer 
them without lying. The government has created and controlled the 
situation so that it can deceive the public by denying these falsities, 
and telling the truth in a covertly-limited and fraudulent context. 

So the government has always avoided the particular 
question—conspicuously never asked by its covert "UFOlogists"—as 


to whether it has knowledge of exclusively man-made, 
electrodynamic flying craft, which the public generally knows as 
UFOs, Government spokesmen could not truthfully or plausibly 
deny their existence, if this question were asked, because the 
security regulations prohibit them from "...either confirming or 
denying..." the existence of any classified aircraft. 

Vallee seems to have foreclosed the possibility of us ever 
knowing the answer to the "UFO enigma" in our time. His 
conclusions are paranormal, seemingly intended to create a 
perpetual, unanswerable mystery around the UFO, which to me is 
just a man-made electrical machine, which, in my estimation, is 
man's greatest invention. Who benefits from concealment? The large 
corporations with vested interests, who would be decimated by 
public access to the technology involved. They are definitely at the 
head of the line of those who would be out of business if we all had 
the technology. That is the "motive" behind the corporate-state 
crime of UFO fraud. 

The government's involvement in the UFO situation is also a 
red herring, since the real impetus for the secrecy comes not from 
the government, but from the corporations and power elite who 
control and use our government, to insure that the power structure 
they created prevails. All the major governments of the world are 
involved in suppressing this great invention, for fear that public 
access will destroy their inordinate coercive monopoly powers to 
control or profit illicitly. I realize that the facts suggest that there is 
a secret corporate "world-state" government of some kind, 
otherwise, there would be no international conspiracy between the 
world's major governments to conceal UFO technology. 

There are plenty of people out there who absolutely know the 
truth, because they have been part of the elite, or part of its 
concealment system, all along. They have been privy to the ships 
themselves or the secret photos showing real ships with military 
markings, and FAA-compliant red and green position beacons, etc., 
which can mean only one thing: They are bound by illegitimate self- 
interests, or national security orders, but I am not. 


Some UFOlogists have been "speaking with a forked 
tongue"—contradicting themselves at every turn—offering a 
multiplicity of "wild cards" or bluffs, dealing from the bottom of the 
deck, slipping cards out of their sleeves, or playing with "daisy 
decks" in the game of UFO poker, as a sort of "insurance", in case 
the direction of the field reverses, in which case they can point at 
whatever option they choose, and say, "See.. I said that back when." 
This strategy is a built-in CIA "contingency plan", intended for it 
to maintain control through opportunism, as a "last ditch" scenario. 
They shouldn't be accepted with open arms. I always liked that 
statement of Ghengis Khan, "Once a traitor, always a traitor; hang 
'em". You certainly don't accept such traitors as the leaders of your 
army. 

Don't be surprised if some of these opportunists start to come 
forward, trying to play their "wild" cards, saying the same things that 
I have been saying since I was a boy, never fooled even once by the 
false propaganda. They are no more than opportunists, who have 
built their deceitful "careers" with ease, with official government 
sponsorship, and now want to switch sides, with their unearned, 
government-bought "name-recognition", when they see that their 
side is losing. If successful, they would only turn things back the 
other way again, a complete lie. 
The next time you are confronted with a higher gasoline, heating 
or electric bill, or contrived power blackout—not to mention an 
empty billfold—remember these traitors, and recognize that our 
government uses paranormalist propaganda to conceal technology 
which would alleviate or eliminate most if not all of these energy 
problems, as well as to stop the political control of our military being 
directed toward globalist objectives, and to stop the exploitation of 
Americans through global control and manipulation of petroleum. 
We Americans have much more to live for than a feudal fealty 
to global oil corporations. We have been weakened domestically in 
order to extort our support of these global objectives, by continually 
limiting and jeopardizing our energy resources, jacking up prices, 
and making us fight and pay for the oil companies' private interests. 


CHAPTER VIII - LA REVOLUCION TECHNOLOGIA: 


Turning Things Around Through Technology


In 1997, Chapter VI of Occult Ether Physics was entitled "Free 
Energy Massacre: The Atomic Hydrogen Process ©1996". The rest 
of the book traced the discovery of electrodynamic space propulsion 
by Nikola Tesla, within the scientific milieu of the late 19th century. 
This was the world of "aether physics", just approaching the "wrong 
turn" which physics took after the 1905 publishing of Einstein's 
Theory of Relativity. The crooked road for that wrong turn had 
already been laid by some of the ether physicists themselves. 

Beginning with my 1993 Space Aliens From the Pentagon, I 
dared to attack Relativist theory and concepts, up through my 1999 
Pentagon Aliens, in an ever increasing number and quality of ways. 
One of the concepts I developed was that free-energy physics is 
exclusively a non-Relativistic ether concept. That is the reason Tesla 
was so opposed to Relativism. One cannot discuss Teslian concepts 
in the same breath as Relativist ones. Relativism forbids "free- 
energy". 

Today, suddenly, masquerading as "free-energy researchers", 
there appears a plethora of Relativists. Relativists are like broken 
records, and cannot get out of the same old Relativist "groove". If 
you look at their websites, and read their material, all you see is the 
'same old same old' contorted Relativist "theories". They theorize, 
and theorize, and theorize, but what do they really do? They 
theorize...curved space...dilated time...and ruminate through all the 
other aspects of the shaky 'house of cards' built by St. Albert. And 
out of these insane ruminations, they attempt to solve the riddle of 
"gravity", "anti-gravity" and "fluctuations in the quantum vacuum 
field", but no solutions are in sight now, just as none were in sight 
in 1905. 

And now, when it appears that ether physics may really have 
something, they are invading the free-energy field, even pretending 
to be the discoverers of this or that—actually ideas stolen from those 
without "credentials"—and have found a haven in which to build a 


"new" nest, lined with the feathers of contorted mathematics, 
Platonist epistemology and circuitous reasoning. History will 
eventually undo them, showing them to be intellectual thieves. 

It is often said that "an idea cannot be patented". There is 
something wrong with that, but even if true under the law, it is still 
intellectually dishonest to claim the discovery of someone else's idea 
in a patent application, without the slightest attribution, when it is 
known that priority was with the victim of that theft. 

Scientists like Michael Faraday and many of his colleagues 
wouldn't have thought of taking the ideas of others, without saying 
where they got them. The "rush to the patent office" to claim such 
unpatented discoveries made by others is not only illegal, but 
unethical, because such applications require the swearing of an oath 
declaring that the claimant knows of no priority by anyone. 

Relativism does not recognize free-energy, ether, ZPR or 
electromagnetic radiation which travels through space. Their theory 
was based on "corpuscular photons", which required no 
luminiferous ether to transport their force through space. The 
concept of the "photon" implies a "light particle", not 
electromagnetic wave radiation, because without an ether, there 
would be nothing for a wave to "wave" (wave action requires a 
"medium" to wave, similar to a wave on a pond of water). 

Relativists hang out on the Internet constantly, looking for 
ideas to steal and claim as their own. Why? Because Relativism does 
not produce any results, will sabotage your brain and cripple your 
creativity and reason. Those who practice this religion spend all 
their time praying at the Holy Shrine of Einstein, but their 'god' 
gives them nothing. Was it all Einstein's sick joke on them? 

Relativism recognizes no "quantum vacuum field" or ether in 
"empty space". Einstein's theory of gravity was wrong, because he 
believed in no ether. So the Relativists invented a "quantum vacuum 
field" with "fluctuations" (i.e., oscillations), in contradiction to their 
religion. 

The Relativist is a mathematical creature, who confuses 
himself with his equations, getting high on them but getting 


(109 kcal/gram mole) "has" to be equal to the dissociation energy. 
Consequently, they never measured it directly, only extrapolated it 
retroactively as "equal", based on this erroneous theory. 

I found a reference from a reputable source which gave the 
dissociation energy as 103 cal/gram mole1, rather than the 109 k-
cal/gram mole of the Relativists. I preferred that figure, since it was 
published by a major house, and had gone through five editions 
without challenge. It differed from the "norm", which was 
controlled by Relativist theory. Maybe, I thought, Van Nostrand was 
independent, since they had published some Tesla books in the early 
20th century, after Relativism had begun to take over. 

It is also said by Relativist theory that all that is required to 
dissociate diatomic hydrogen to monoatomic hydrogen, is heat 
energy, which is supposed to be equal "exactly" to the 
recombination energy. This dissociation/recombination energy is 
also supposed to be equal to the "bond energy" which has been 
broken by heat, which is then supposed to be stored in the 
monoatomic hydrogen atoms until released again in recombination, 
whereupon the broken bonds are "restored". This would have to 
mean that the bond energy of a diatomic molecule would have to be 
equal to the energy "stored" in the monoatomic atoms, minus the 
energy released by recombination. 

My hypothesis was that the dissociation energy required to 
separate the diatomic atoms could not be greater than the energy of 
combustion of H2 with oxygen, which produces H2O, with a bond 
which is supposed to be stronger, due to the electromotive difference 
between oxygen and hydrogen. Using the Relativists' own standard, 
this means that the energy of dissociation/recombination of 
hydrogen is 3.76 times that for hydrogen hydrolysis/combustion. 
This is yet another internal contradiction in Relativist theory. 

According to Langmuir, atomic hydrogen is produced directly 
in hydrolysis using a lead amalgam cathode. Yet, since Langmuir was 
a Relativist, he never measured it directly, but computed the 

1Encyclopedia of Science, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company (1976), fifth edition 

161 


dissociation energy backward on paper as the same as the 
recombination energy, assuming that the electrical wattage required 
to produce a gram mole of atomic hydrogen was equal to the 
recombination energy per gram mole of monoatomic hydrogen. 

If the energy required to break the diatomic bonds is supposed 
to be equal to the 'stored' heat in dissociated atoms, and the bonds 
are 'restored' when the atoms recombine, the 'bonds' would still 
have to contain the same energy as that which had already been 
released during the 'restoration', according to Relativism. 

Either the diatomic bond energy is "replaced" by heat on 
dissociation, and converted back to heat on recombination—and 
therefore taken away—or the heat stored "in" the mono atomic 
atoms only dissociates the atoms when it places enough strain on the 
bonds to break them. Since the bonds are restored when the heat is 
released, the force maintaining the bonds is neither heat nor another 
force converted from heat, but would still have to exist somewhere. 
My theory is that IR radiation ("heat") can be stored in the 
space between nuclei and electron clouds, as well as in 
intermolecular space, when dissociation occurs. The radiation 
remains in its original electromagnetic wave form as it bounces 
around inside, 'force free', reflected between the nuclei and electron 
clouds. Since IR radiation is of lower frequency and voltage than 
UV radiation, it lacks sufficient penetrating power or force to break 
out of this space until the recombination of the monoatomic atoms, 
at which time it is able to exit when the electron clouds open up, as 
the new diatomic electrostatic bonds re-attach. 

I think the "bonds" are electrostatic ones, which can be broken 
by heat, by expanding or stressing the space between nuclei and 
electron clouds to the bonds' elastic limits, or by other radiation, or 
by electrostatic force. This is merely mechanical. A more efficient 
means of breaking the bonds should be by electrostatics. Even more 
effectively, they should be broken more easily by higher frequency 
radiation, such as UV. In addition, UV radiation transmutes 
hydrogen and ail other elements below atomic number 19. This 
should yield additional energy on reversal. This appears to involve 


bringing in excess charges from the ether, and holding them in the 
bonding spaces, as indicated by microphotos of diatomic hydrogen 
atoms which show extra electric charges in the inter-molecular 
space. This violates Relativism, representing sub-electron charges. 
If electrostatics can break the bonds, the proper "arc" should 
be an electrostatic one, rather than a conventional AC or DC arc 
current, usually used to dissociate atomic hydrogen. Since it is also 
recognized that the process by ordinary arc discharge/heat is 
incomplete, perhaps electrostatics can also make it more complete. 
The dissociation of hydrogen by heat appears to be a 
mechanical one, related to the kinetic energy of the heat-induced 
increase in vibrations of the diatomic nuclei and electrons, caused 
by IR radiation. That being the case, it should also be subject to the 
rule that the electromagnetic interaction is 1040 times greater than 
the gravitational one.2 This should therefore be related to the 
hydrogen nucleus' gravitational mass, versus the use of electrostatic 
force to break the bonds more efficiently, since the electromagnetic 
interaction should do more work on the nucleus during the same 
time, and should therefore improve the process. 

Langmuir first noticed the atomic hydrogen reaction after 
hydrogen gas was passed around heated tungsten wires, believing 
that heat transferred to the hydrogen broke the bonds. However, 
tungsten may react electrostatically or catalytically to break the 
diatomic bonds. This 1912 experiment was originally done in 
Socorro, New Mexico, in a desert well-known for its high 
electrostatic activity. In this region it is very difficult to avoid 
electrostatic charges. 

Neither my name nor my books are cited by some researchers 
who were kicked into high gear by my "cold fusion" research, my 
books, my thoughts and my generosity. They do not cite my work 
because I am not obsessed with Relativism and its orgiastic 
mathematics, the very things standing in their way, 

I now say to them: You are welcome to use whatever I disclose 

2George Gamow, Gravity 

163 


in my books, but at least have the common decency to say where 
you got it. It is bigger to say that someone influenced you, than to 
pretend that you had no help when you did. And by all means, 
please don't try to describe things in reality with Relativist 
terminology. 

I find it ironic that those high and mighty Relativist physicists, 
who looked down on me because I refused to speak their erroneous 
"math-ese", now appropriate my energy ideas without any 
attribution whatsoever, yet fail to see the available energy in 
reactions they have observed for years, because it has been 
concealed by their revered Relativism. Sooner or later, the disparity 
between theory and practice will become so obvious that they should 
be exposed as the hypocrites and idea-thieves they are. We are on 
the verge of a radical change in physics, and it hasn't been the result 
of the physics establishment itself. 

"We are living in a time when history is holding its breath, and 
the present is detaching itself from the past like an iceberg that 
has broken from its icy moorings to sail across the boundless 
sea.' 

Arthur C. Clarke 
The Children of Icarus 

If the forces which militate against individual human creativity 
are held in check, humanity will not only survive, but will flourish. 
The Revolution begins with you, and should make things better for 
all, in the building of a "Creative Utopia"........a "CREATOPIA"™. 


BIBLIOGRAPHY 

Alfven, Hannes -Existence of Electromagnetic Hydrodynamic Waves, Nature, vol. 150
(Oct. 3, 1942) pp. 405-6
Angebert, Jean Michel - The Occult and the Third Reich, McGraw-Hill Book Company 
Armstrong, R.L., King, J.D. - The Electromagnetic Interaction, Prentiss-Hall, Inc., 
Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 
Bondi, H. - Cosmology, 2nd ed., Cambridge U. Press, London/NY (1961) 
Boscovich, R.G. - Theoria Philosophiae Naturalis, Venice (1763)
Bush, President George W. - Press Interview, Feb. 11, 2001 (regarding FBI Russian mole
Richard Hanssen's arrest) 
Cantrell, William - Commentary on Maxwell's Equations and Special Relativity Theory, 
Infinite Energy Magazine, Vol. 7, Issue 38, July/Aug. 2001 
Clarke, Sir Arthur C. - Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, Lecture at Keesler AFB, Miss., ca.
Dec,1956 
Cornu, M.A. - Comptes Rendus xcix (1884) p. 1045; Exp. Res., §3075
Cornu, M.A. - Comptes Rendus xcii (1881) p. 1368
Einstein, Albert, Theory of Relativity (1905) 
Einstein Reconsidered - Myths and Realities of Space, Time, and Ether, Infinite Energy 
Magazine, Eugene Mallove, Ed. (Vol. 7, Issue 38, 2001)
Encyclopedia of Science, Van Nostrand Reinhold Company (1976), 5th ed. 
Faraday, Michael - Thoughts on Ray Vibrations, Phil. Mag. (3) xxviii (1846) 
FBI Documents on Nikola Tesla (232 pages released under FOIA)
Fitzgerald, G.F. - Letter (Fitzgerald to Sir Oliver Heaviside, 8 June 1846)
Fuller, John G. - Flying Saucer Fiasco, LOOK Magazine (May 14, 1968)
Gamow, George - Gravity, Doubleday & Company, Inc., N.Y. 
Gamow, George - Thirty Years That Shook Physics, Doubleday & Company, Inc., Garden 
City, N.Y. (1966)
Gifis, Steven H. - Law Dictionary
Good, Timothy - Above Top Secret (1988) 
Griffin, G. Edward - World Without Cancer, American Media (1974) 
Hitler, Adolf- Mein Kampf Houghton-Mifflin, Boston
Hubble, E.P. - The Realm of the Nubulae, Yale U. Press, New Haven, Conn. (1936)
Huygens, C. - Traite de la lumiere 
Janes, Fighting Aircraft of World War Two (ca. 1946) 
O'Neill, John J. - Prodigal Genius, the Life of Nikola Tesla (1944) 
Jung, C.G. - (collective unconscious/collective conscious theories of) 
Kehoe, Maj. Donald E. - Aliens From Space...The Real Story of Unidentified Flying Objects 
(1973) 
Langmuir, Physik. Z., 14, 1273 (1913)
Lapp, R.E., Andrews, H.L. - Nuclear Radiation Physics, Prentiss-Hall, Inc., N.Y. (1950) 
Lerner, Eric - The Big Bang Never Happened, Random House (1991)
LeSage, George Louis - Mem de Berlin for 1782
Lyne, William R. - Free Energy Surprise (1997), Creatopia Productions
Lyne, William R. - No Aliens, Just Assholes (article), Paranoia Magazine
Lyne, William R. - Occult Ether Physics, lst ed. (1997) Creatopia Productions



Lyne, William R, - Occult Ether Physics, 2nd ed. (1998), Creatopia Productions
Lyne, William R, - Pentagon Aliens, (renamed), 3rd ed. (1999), Creatopia Productions
Lyne, William R. - Space Aliens From the Pentagon, lsted. (1993), Creatopia Productions. 
Lyne, William R. -Space Aliens From the Pentagon, 2nd ed. (1996)
Lyne, William R. - The Mystical Roots of Totalitarianism (unpublished manuscript, ©1979) 
Manual of Toxicology (ca. 1957, publisher unknown)
Mallove, Eugene, Editor - Infinite Energy Magazine 
Martin, T.C. - The Inventions, Researches and Writings of Nikola Tesla, The Electrical
Engineer, N.Y. (1894) 
Nernst, W. - Theorem (on thermodynamics) 
New York Times, July 11,1937, p. 13, col. 2 - Announcement (Tesla's radium transmutation 
technology, interstellar energy beam development) 
New York Times, Oct. 8, 1966 (article on Condon Committee)
Newton, Sir Isaac-Memoir, Phil. Trans, vii (1762); Royal Society, 9 Dec, 1676 (Birch iii) 
Orwell, George - 1984 (1949)
Parascope, Inc. (1996)
Patton, Phil - Dreamland (1998) 
Pauwels, Louis and Bergier, Jacques - Morning of the Magicians, Stein & Day, Publishers, 


N.Y.
Plato - Dialogues 
Priestley, J. - History 
Psychology Today (ca. 1977) Narcolepsy 
Rand, Ayn - Philosophy: Who Needs It?
Rand, Ayn - Rule By Consensus, The New Fascism, (lecture), ca. 1968 
Ratzlaff, John T. - Tesla Said (a compilation of Tesla statements), Tesla Book Co., Chula 
Vista, Ca. 
Santa Fe New Mexican (from AP), 7/30/2001, NASA probe on mission to catch some rays
("Genesis" probe) 
Siegel, Dr. Jerome - Narcolepsy, Scientific American (2000)
Simpson, Christopher - Blowback, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, N.Y.
Skeptical Opinion (magazine) 
Szasz, Thomas - Manifesto (summary statement) (1998) 
Szasz, Thomas - The Myth of Mental Disease (1960) 
Tesla, Nikola - Colorado Springs Notes - 1899-1900, Nolit, Beograd, Terasije 27, 
Yugoslavia (1978) 
Tesla, Nikola - Experiments with Alternate Currents of High Potential and High Frequency
(lecture before the Institution of Electrical Engineers, London, 1892) 
Tesla, Nikola - German Cosmic Ray Theory Questioned, New York Herald Tribune (Mar. 
3,1935) 
Tesla, Nikola - Lecture Before theA.I.E.E., Columbia College (1891)
Tesla, Nikola - Nikola Tesla Papers (Apr. 15, 1932) Rare Books and Manuscripts Library,
Columbia U., N.Y. 
Tesla, Nikola - Prepared Statement, New York Times, July 10, 1937, p. 13, col. 2
Tesla, Nikola - Radio Power Will Revolutionize the World (interview by Alfred Albelli), 
Modern Mechanics and Invention (July, 1934)
The Skeptical Inquirer (magazine) 

The Skeptic (magazine) 
Thomson, Sir William - Baltimore Lectures 
Thomson, J. J. - Recent Researches in Electricity and Magnetism (1893) p. 13 
TRUE X-FILES.NEWS (an Internet news service) 
Vallee, Jacques - Anatomy of a Fraud, Journal of Scientific Exploration 
Vallee, Jacques - Forbidden Science 
Vallee, Jacques - Passport to Magonia 
Valmiki - Ramayana (pan-Indian legend, purportedly the first novel ever written) 
Wheeler, J.A. - Geometrodynamics, Academic Press (1962) 
Whittaker, Sir Edmund - A History of the Theories of Aether and Electricity, Revised and 
enlarged ed. (1951), Thomas Nelson and Sons, Edinburgh 
Yanigasawa, Dr. Masashi - Mouse Studies Link Feeding-Behaviour Gene with Narcolepsy, 
Research News, Howard Hughes Medical Institute (2000). 


VITA 

William Lyne was born in Big Spring, Texas, and was raised in West Texas 
cattle and oilfield boom towns, with two years in the San Francisco Bay area 
during WWII, as a Navy brat. He enjoyed several sports, his favorites being long 
distance running, swimming and football. He played solo baritone horn in Waco 
High School Band, Texas' best high school band, in 1956, led by the immortal 
Lyle Skinner, in its 25th consecutive Dist. IV-A Texas Sweepstakes victory 
performance, and won a gold medal for his solo. 

In 1956, Lyne entered the Air Force. He was removed from an Air Traffic 
Control School (GCA), placed in Air Force Intelligence, and granted a Top Secret 
Clearance, which, unknown to him at the time, was primarily to prevent his 
public disclosure of a Soviet spy ring he had discovered at the age of 18, while in 
basic training at Lackland AFB, Texas. 

In 1965, Lyne acquired a B.S., with a double major (Fine Arts and Industrial 
Arts), Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas. In 1969, he acquired an 
MFA in Studio Arts from the University of Texas. When he arrived in New 
Mexico in 1970, he was a professional artist (painting and sculpture), a 
profession abandoned years ago due to constant harassment orchestrated by the 
CIA (he refused an executive position they offered him). 

Lyne has lived in New Mexico for the past thirty-one years, where he 
engages in energy R & D, writes, publishes, and pursues very broad interests, 
ranging from art to music, cinema, acting, photography, science, epigraphy and 
petroglyphs, archaeology, ancient history, geography, inventing, interpretation 
of current events and enjoying the beautiful Southwestern scenery and culture. 

Lyne has three previous books presently in print: PENTAGON ALIENS 
(1999)(revised, expanded and renamed 3rd ed. Of his 1993 book, Space Aliens 
From the Pentagon); OCCULT ETHER PHYSICS (1997), revised 2nd ed. (1998); 
FREE ENERGY SURPRISE (1997), a technical report, involving a free-energy 
discovery. Lyne's next book is THE GALISTEA TANOAN-EGYPTIAN DJED 
FESTIVAL STONE: Thothmes Ill's Expedition to New Mexico, ca. 1625 B.C., 
isbn 0-9637467-3-1. 

Lyne presently resides in Lamy, New Mexico, and is currently single. 


THE BOOK WHICH TELLS IT ALL: WHAT FLYING 
SAUCERS AND UFOS ARE, WHO INVENTED THEM, 
HOW THEY WORK, AND WHO IS BEHIND THE 
CONCEALMENT OF THIS HIGH TECHNOLOGY, 
CARRIED OUT THROUGH DOUBLE-TALK AND 
FALSE "ALIEN" PROPAGANDA, AND WHY. 

HAVE A MAJORITY OF PEOPLE SWALLOWED A 
BIG LIE DESIGNED BY A POWERFUL ELITE TO 
CONCEAL THINGS WHICH ARE CRUCIAL TO 
FUTURE AMERICAN ECONOMY, INDEPENDENCE 
AND SURVIVAL AS A GREAT NATION? 

WAS THIS FANTASTIC TECHNOLOGY INVENTED 
IN THE 19TH CENTURY BY NIKOLA TESLA, AND IS 
THE PRESENT TOP PHYSICS' A COVER-UP OF THE 
REAL ETHER PHYSICS' UPON WHICH THESE SHIPS 
ARE BASED? 

IF YOU THINK UFOS DON'T EXIST OR ARE FROM 
OUTER SPACE, THINK AGAIN. THIS BOOK WILL 
BLOW YOUR MIND. 

William Lyne was born in West Texas and raised in oil boom towns. He had a Top 
Secret clearance in Air Force Intelligence. In 1975, he rejected a high-paying and 
prestigious executive CIA poition offered by director George Bush, because he 
believes the National Security Act of 1947 is an illegal batrayal of American 
sovreignty and liberty, and that the flying saucer, a man's greatest invention, 
should be enjoyed by all. He began research leading to this book over 50 years 
ago. Contains much never before published information, including photos of a 
celestial guidance system from a WW H-vintage Nazi "Kreisel Teller" ("Gyrating 
Saucer"). 

$25.00 - ISBN 0-9637467-7-4. To order, send $25. plus $3.00 shipping and handling 
to Wm. Lyne, Creatopia™, Cerro Circle 31-B, Lamy, New Mexico 87540. For more 
information, call or fax (505) 466-3022. 


OCCULT ETHER PHYSICS: 

Tesla's Hidden SpacePropulsion System and the 
Conspiracy to Conceal It 

Is there a "Secret Physics" 
with a different set of rules— 
hidden away from us earlier in 
this century, by a powerful elite 
who fear the technology based 
on it will strip away their power 
and wealth, and liberate us from 
their grip? Dynamite comes in 
small packages, and this little 
stick of scientific dynamite 
blows apart pseudo-scientific 
myths and instills the truth. 

OCCULT ETHER PHYSICS © 1997, Wm. R. Lyne
CREATOPIA PRODUCTIONS™
ISBN 0-9637467-6-6 - $10.00


To order this book send $ 10. plus $2. shipping and handling to Wm. 
Lyne, Creatopia™, Cerro Circle 31-B, Lamy, New Mexico 87540 


FREE ENERGY SURPRISE


What did Nikola Tesla mean when he said he had 
found a new (environmental, free-energy) use for 
iron? He stated at one point, that for every 200pounds of iron, 
another horsepower was added toone of his electrical generators. Why? How? 
In the 1890s, he spoke of using "cosmic radiation" 

(whichhe also called "Primary Solar Rays") for thegeneration of energy, 
and said this radiation—'which today we call the 
ZPR ("Zero Point Radiation")—interacted with the ether and matter,
to produce useful electrical energy in great amounts. 

When Relativism was promoted in 1919, 
Tesla continued to assert that the theory was wrong, 
and challenged the proponents of the theory to find fault 
with his theories, 
and they declined to do so. Tesla claimed that the radiation produced by 
"radioactive elements" was actually a reaction with the ZPR. 
Was he right? The author of this paper, William R. Lyne, 
in collaboration with a reader of his books, 
engagedin some unusual and innovative research, and have 
evolved 
some inventions which appear to completelyrefute the Relativist theory of "nuclear energy" as we 
think we know it, showing that "E = (much more 
than) MC2. 

This Text ic Copyrigt from Originally Autor.
Its to have as printed book in US

G.Pese